Статья 'Современная интерпретация классического искусства: кризис понимания?' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Современная интерпретация классического искусства: кризис понимания?

Toporina Ekaterina Alekseevna

PhD in Philosophy

senior researcher of the Philosophical Faculty, Department of the History of Foreign Philosophy at Lomonosov Moscow State University

119991, Russia, Moscow, str. Lomonosovsky prospekt, 27, bld. 4

top-kate@yandex.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 
Ter-Gukasova Tatiana

PhD in Philosophy

Docent, the department of Social and Humanitarian Disciplines, Moscow Banking Institute

117292, Russia, Moscow, Profsoyuznaya Street 18, office #2

tatyana.ter-gukasova@yandex.ru
Hominskaya Valentina Maksimovna

PhD in Philosophy

Docent, the department of Aesthetics, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University

119234, Russia, Moscow, Lomonosovsky Prospekt 27, building #4

dubki1@mail.ru

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2016.12.18236

Received:

06-03-2016


Published:

22-01-2017


Abstract: The subject of this research is the modern interpretation of classical art. The authors refer to the issues of understanding of the classical art, adequacy of conveying its meanings, experiencing the art and communication with it, value aspect of art works, as well as question of tradition and innovations in modern perception of the classical art. These problems are reveals through the reference to the practice of modern art – multiple movie and theatrical production of the classicism. The authors attempt to answer the question what is the modern interpretation of art, by analyzing the position of the classics in modern art and basing themselves on the works of philosophers, aestheticians, critics, literary scholars, and members of art community. Based on the analysis of “life” of the classicism in modern cultural-aesthetical field, the authors demonstrate the crisis of its understanding, rather than the attentive perusal realized by the contemporary means. Today, any re-interpretation of the composition can find (and finds) its justification and explanation. It is associated not only with the factors that should be viewed through the prism of development of the art, innovations, search of the new forms, but also more extensively – as a sustainable trend of confrontation of “non-classicism” with the traditional classical art. Such confrontation to a considerable degree causes the “crisis of understanding” of the classical artistic legacy and its interpretation in the modern art.


Keywords:

Value, Artistic legacy, Tradition, Dialogue, Theatre, Cinematography, Distortion, Understanding, Modern interpretation, Classical literature

References
1. Andreeva E.Yu. Postmodernizm: Iskusstvo vtoroi poloviny XX – nachala XXI veka. SPb., 2007. S. 14.
2. Artyukh A.A. Virtual'naya real'nost' i problema ee reprezentatsii (animatsionnyi effekt) //Materialy pervoi vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. 27-28 aprelya 2005 goda. Moskva, VGIK. M., 2006. 230 s.
3. Norshtein Yu. Sneg na trave. – URL: http://theatre-teorema.ucoz.com/rejissura/Norshtein_U_Sneg_na_trave.doc.
4. Vel'flin G. Klassicheskoe iskusstvo. Vvedenie v ital'yanskoe Vozrozhdenie. M., 2004. 368 s.
5. Tsapesh V.V. Esteticheskaya sushchnost' teatral'nogo deistviya: obshchenie kak tvorchestvo. M., 1992. 121 s.
6. Dyufren M. Vklad estetiki v filosofiyu // Estetika i teoriya iskusstva XX veka. Khrestomatiya. M., 2007. S. 159.
7. Frank S.L. Dukhovnye osnovy obshchestva. M., 1992. S. 11.
8. Levinson J. What is Aesthetic Pleasure? // The Pleasures of Aesthetics. Ithaca and London. 1996. P. 7.
9. Rid G. Znachenie iskusstva. (Fragmenty) // Sovremennaya zapadnoevropeiskaya i amerikanskaya estetika. M., 2002. 224 s.
10. Bychkov V. K filosofii Leksikona //Leksikon nonklassiki. Khudozhestvenno-esteticheskaya kul'tura XX veka / Pod red. V.V. Bychkova. M., 2003. S. 8.
11. Khominskaya V.M. Kul'turno-esteticheskii faktor v sovremennom razvitii russkogo yazyka // Metody, ponyatiya i kommunikatsii v sovremennom esteticheskom diskurse. Materialy III mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii, provedennoi v MGU 21-22 noyabrya, 2008 god. M., 2008. S. 108.
12. Samokhvalova V.I. Bezobraznoe: razmyshleniya i ego prirode, sushchnosti i meste v mire. M., 2010. S. 165.
13. Sitkovskii Gleb. Shchenyach'i nezhnosti. – URL: http://www.smotr.ru/2004/2004_gitis_malchiky.htm. Data obrashcheniya 22.01.2016.
14. Khoruzhii S.S. «Brat'ya Karamazovy v prizme isikhastskoi antropologii // Dostoevskii i mirovaya kul'tura. Al'manakh. 2009. № 25. S. 39.
15. Morsin Aleksandr. Postanovshchik «Tangeizera» Timofei Kulyabin: Kogda rezhisser vynuzhden ob''yasnyat' prokuroru svoi zamysel — eto chudovishchno. –URL: https://snob.ru/selected/entry/89397#comment_775647. Data obrashcheniya 22.01.2016.
16. Lavrova Lyudmila. Mariya Gulegina: «Net zhizni bez lyubvi» // «Literaturnaya gazeta», № 31 (6519) (29-07-2015). S. 21.
17. Bykova Rimma. Unizheny dostoinye pokloneniya.-URL: http://www.mxat-teatr.ru/docs/tpl/doc_clean.asp?id=132&. Data obrashcheniya 23.01.2016.
18. Georgii Sviridov. Muzyka kak sud'ba, M., 2002. S. 205.
19. Bakhtin M.M. Avtor i geroi v esteticheskoi deyatel'nosti // Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. 2-e izd. M., 1986. S. 77.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.