|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Dzekh A.V., Kotelevskii D.V.
Philosophical foundations of environmentalism
// Philosophy and Culture.
2016. № 4.
P. 488-496.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2016.4.17931 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=17931
Философские основания энвайронментализма
Dzekh Anastasiya Vladimirovna
Post-graduate student, the department of Culturology and Social Cultural Work, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin
620002, Russia, Yekaterinburg, Mira Street 19
|
ven_19@mail.ru
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
Kotelevskii Dmitrii Vladimirovich
PhD in Philosophy
Docent, the department of Ontology and Theory of Cognition, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin
620002, Russia, Yekaterinburg, Mira Street 19
|
|
kotelevsky@mail.ru
|
|
 |
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2016.4.17931
Received:
09-02-2016
Published:
14-06-2016
Abstract:
The subject of this article is the concepts of nature and human in the works of the authors – representatives of environmentalism, and the philosophers and sociologists whose ideas were included into the context of the environmentalistic thought. The goal of this research is to demonstrate how these authors solve the task of overcoming the classical cognitive opposition of nature and culture, which allows the representatives of such direction to observe the entire system of human activity and the prospects of social development from the new angle. Special attention is given to the examination of the peculiarities of the modern European understanding of nature, which in many aspects determined the sway of living of a European person, as well as the logic of development of almost all elements of the human life. It is also illustrated how the modern European model of world perception, based on the subject-object model, is being surmounted within the contemporary environmentalistic thought. The article explores the philosophical grounds of the new ways of understanding of nature in environmentalism, as well as highlights the major disputes related to his topic. The scientific novelty consists in description of the philosophical foundations of environmentalism that are yet to be completed, and currently presented by several programs with certain advantages and disadvantages. The conclusion is made that within the framework of environmentalism there is an active process of search and formulation of the new principles of human and social existence, which imply the new ways of understanding of the human-nature relations, and the new types of social activity that include nature into the other contexts of human activity.
Keywords:
Hybridism, Subject-object orientation, Binary oppositions, Naturalism, Actor-network theory, Environmentalism, Modern European culture, Human, Culture, Nature
References
1. Braiant L. R. Na puti k okonchatel'nomu osvobozhdeniyu ob''ekta ot sub''ekta // Logos. 2014. № 4 (100). S. 295-292. URL: http://logosjournal.ru/arch/76/100_18.pdf
2. Vakhshtain V. Sotsiologiya veshchei i «povorot k material'nomu» v sotsial'noi teorii // Vakhshtain, V. Sotsiologiya veshchei. M.: Territoriya budushchego, 2006. S. 7-39.
3. Delez Zh., Gvattari F. Tysyacha plato: Kapitalizm i shizofreniya. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya; M.: Astrel', 2010. – 895 s.
4. Deskola F. Po tu storonu prirody i kul'tury. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2012. – 584 s.
5. Kiselev N. N. Ob''ekt ekologii i ego evolyutsiya: Filos.-metodol. aspekt. Kiev: Naukova dumka, 1979. – 135 s.
6. Latur B. Politika prirody // Neprikosnovennyi zapas. 2006. № 2(46). URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/nz/2006/2/la3.html
7. Naranovich S. «My zhivem vnutri metafiziki»: interv'yu s Gremom Kharmanom // Metropol', 2015. URL: http://mtrpl.ru/graham-harman
8. Nesyn I. G. Ekologizatsiya soznaniya kak filosofskii aspekt envaironmentalizma: Avtoref. dis. … kand. filos. nauk : 09.00. Tomsk: [b. i.], 2003. – 22 s.
9. Trubina E. G. Gorod v teorii. Opyty osmysleniya prostranstva. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2011.-518 s.
10. Fuko, M. Nadzirat' i nakazyvat'. M.: Ad Marginem, 1999. – 478 s.
11. Sheffer Zh.-M. Konets chelovecheskoi isklyuchitel'nosti M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2010. – 390 s.
12. Etiko-esteticheskii podkhod v okhrane dikoi prirody i zapovednom dele: Sbornik statei / Sost.: V. B. Boreiko, E. A. Simonov, N. R. Danilina. B. m., 1997. URL: http://www.ecoethics.ru/old/b10/
13. Boas G. Nature // Dictionary of the History of Ideas. URL: http://xtf.lib.virginia.edu/xtf/view?docId=DicHist/uvaBook/tei/DicHist3.xml;chunk.id=dv3-44;toc.depth=1;toc.id=dv3-44;brand=default
14. Brennan A., Lo Yeuk-Sze. Environmental ethics // Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-environmental/#TraEthTheConEnvEth
15. Moran J. Three challenges for environmental philosophy // Philosophy now. 2012. Issue 8. URL: https://philosophynow.org/issues/88/Three_Challenges_For_Environmental_Philosophy
16. Morton T. Ecology without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007. – 249 s.
17. Morton T. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013. – 229 s.
18. Morton T. The Ecological Thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2010. – 184 s.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
