|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Demenev D.N.
About a taste problem in art
// Philosophy and Culture.
2016. ¹ 3.
P. 440-451.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2016.3.17661 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=17661
Î ïðîáëåìå âêóñà â èñêóññòâå
Demenev Denis Nikolaevich
PhD in Philosophy
Docent, the department of Architecture and Fine Arts, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University
455000, Russia, Chelyabinsk region, Magnitogorsk, Lenin str., 38, office building
|
denis-demenev@mail.ru
|
|
|
Other publications by this author |
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2016.3.17661
Received:
20-01-2016
Published:
20-05-2016
Abstract:
The main subject of this research are taste judgments in the visual arts. Several centuries ago, German philosopher Immanuel Kant formulated his famous antinomy of taste. According to the author they remain relevant to this day. Contradictions between the public and professional and artistic (personal) preferences, the author examines how the struggle between two authoritarian systems: from the perspective of a viewer (customer) and from the perspective of the Author. The author of this study believes that it is absolutely free from any conditions the artist was at the dawn of the art in primitive society. Removing the taste of the contradictions in contemporary artistic practice, in the opinion of the author of the study, through an "action conventions". Methodological base of research is the method of the structurally functional analysis; dialectical method; a method of intellectual speculation, as well as General scientific (General logical) methods: analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, analogy. The study's author comes to the following conclusions:1. The great assumption of I. Kant about the social background of the antinomies, remains relevant today.2. A century later, from early modernist experiments, in the synthesis of the aforementioned constructs, the modern visual art comes to the measure of conditionality. The concept of "measure of conditionality" is a a so-called aurea mediocritas (Latin) – the "Golden mean" and gives a key to the synthesis of these and other opposites.
Keywords:
Reasoning, Contradiction, Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis, Art, Authoritativeness , Measure of conditionality, Painter, Taste
References
1. Ziegenfuss, W. Di Uberwindung des Geschmacks / W. Ziegenfuss. Potsdam, 1949. S. 113.
2. Demenev D. N. Mera, garmoniya, vkus, kak vazhneishie strukturnye elementy khudozhestvennogo proizvedeniya / D. N. Demenev // Filosofiya i kul'tura. M.: Institut filosofii RAN, 2010. ¹ 10 (34). S. 21-28.
3. Demenev D. N. Vzaimodeistvie «vkusa», «mery» i «garmonii» v proizvedeniyakh zhivopisi. // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. 2014. ¹ 8. S.109-139. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.8.13400. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_13400.html (Data obrashcheniya 25.12.2015);
4. Sulzer J. G. Allgmeine Theorie der schonen Kunste, Bd. II / J. G. Sulzer. Leipzig, 1794. S. 371.
5. Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti / sost., obshch. red. V. F. Asmus. M.: Mysl', 1999. 1472 s.
6. Karlik E. A. Edinaya teoriya svoistv – napravlenie sozdaniya novykh osnov nauki / E. A. Karlik // Ezhemesyachnyi zhurnal Evraziiskogo Soyuza Uchenykh: sb. statei mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Otv.red. D.P. Karkushin. Moskva, 2014. ¹ 6 (14). Vyp. 6. S. 74-76.
7. Demenev D. N. Dialektika iskusstva: monografiya / D.N. Demenev. Magnitogorsk: Izd-vo Magnitogorsk. gos. tekhn. un-ta im. G.I. Nosova, 2015. 146 s.
8. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya. Pod redaktsiei V.S. Stepina: V 4 tt. M.: Mysl', 2010. T. 4. 736 s.
9. Lotman Yu. M., Uspenskii B.A. Uslovnost' v iskusstve / Lotman Yu.M. // Ob iskusstve. SPb.: «Iskusstvo – SPb», 2000.
10. Filosofskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. M.: INFRA-M, 2009. 570 s.
11. Kant I. Sochineniya v shesti tomakh. Tom 5. M.: Mysl', 1966. 564 s.
12. Trubetskoi N. S. Osnovy fonologii / N.S. Trubetskoi. M.: Izdatel'stvo inostrannoi literatury, 1960. 372, [1] s.
13. Bekon F. Novyi Organon. Aforizmy ob istolkovanii prirody i tsarstva cheloveka // Sochineniya. V 2 tt. M.: Mysl', 1978. T. 2. 575 s.
14. Pogontseva D.V. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya dinamika predstavlenii o zhenskoi krasote // Chelovek i kul'tura. - 2014. - 5. - C. 67 - 85. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8744.2014.5.14612. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_14612.html
15. D. Ya. Severyukhin Khudozhestvennyi rynok i samoorganizatsiya khudozhnikov Leningrada–Sankt-Peterburga v perekhodnyi period (seredina 1980-kh – seredina 2000-kh godov) // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2013. - 1. - C. 74 - 87. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.01.8.
16. Demenev D.N. Vzaimodeistvie «vkusa», «mery» i «garmonii» v proizvedeniyakh zhivopisi. // Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2014. - 8. - C. 109 - 139. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2014.8.13400. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_13400.html
17. V. S. Zhidkov O spetsifike iskusstva XXI veka // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 3. - C. 22 - 37.
18. Lipskii V.N. O vzaimootnosheniyakh khudozhnika i vlasti v Rossii // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2014. - 1. - C. 62 - 67. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2014.1.11961.
19. S. M. Chervonnaya «Realizm bez beregov» Rozhe Garodi i ponyatie granits i beregov v sovetskoi ideologii // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 2. - C. 87 - 94.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|