|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Shilovskaya N.S.
Modality of humanism: from current to possible
// Philosophy and Culture.
2016. № 3.
P. 376-384.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2016.3.17566 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=17566
Модальности гуманизма: от действительного к возможному
Shilovskaya Natal'ya Stanislavovna
PhD in Philosophy
Associate professor of the Department of Philosophy and History of World Perception at Kozma Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University (Minin University).
603016, Russia, g. Nizhnii Novgorod, ul. Avtomekhanicheskaya, 8, kv. 35
|
shilovskaya-nata@mail.ru
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2016.3.17566
Received:
12-01-2016
Published:
20-05-2016
Abstract:
The author distinguishes two philosophical traditions in understanding of modality – gnoseological (I. Kant) and ontological (Aristotle, Hegel). Following the ontological vector of interpretation of modality, humanism is being analyzed through the prism of this category. In the field of discussion are the following questions: necessity of the humanistic outlook; transhumanism as a possibility of humanism, which derives from its circumstances; turn of humanism towards the realities of humanity, human, and reality, which allows humanism to avoid subjectivity in understanding of a human, and as a result of misperception or lie. The conclusion is made that the subjectivity of a human is essential of human’s essence, as well as of the conceptual core of humanism; transhumanism as a potential possible of humanism manifests as a misstatement of the latter; regular possible in human essence, which should be considered and reflected by complete humanism, is two sided of a human – ideal- beautiful and unattractive hidden. curr
Keywords:
Human, Being, Subject, Humanism, Transhumanism, Modality, Essential, Possible, Accidental, Current
References
1. Filosofskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. M.: INFRA-M, 2001. 576 c.
2. Kant I. Kritika chistogo razuma. M.: Eksmo, 2007. 736 c.
3. Gegel' G. Nauka logiki. SPb.: Nauka, 1997. 800 c.
4. Aristotel'. Meteorologika // Sobr. soch. v 4. tt. T 3. M.: Mysl', 1989. 613 s.
5. Filosofskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya. 815 c.
6. Asmus F. Antichnaya filosofiya. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1998. 629 s.
7. Khoruzhii S.S. Fonar' Diogena. Kriticheskaya retrospektiva evropeiskoi antropologii. M. Institut filosofii, teologii i istorii sv. Fomy, 2010. 688 c.
8. Losev A.F. Istoriya antichnoi estetiki. Aristotel' i pozdnyaya klassika. M.: Folio, 2000. 880 c.
9. Manetti D. O dostoinstve i prevoskhodstve cheloveka // Antologiya mirovoi filosofii: Vozrozhdenie. Mn.: Kharvest; M.: AST, 2001. S. 69-84.
10. Losev A.F. Obshchaya kharakteristika estetiki Vozrozhdeniya // A.F. Losev: iz tvorcheskogo naslediya: sovremenniki o myslitele. M.: Russkii mir'', 2007. S. 396-416.
11. Epshtein M. Znak probela: O budushchem gumanitarnykh nauk. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2004. 864 c.
12. Elektronnyi resurs: http://humanityplus.org/
13. Dostoevskii F.M. Zapiski iz podpol'ya. Sobr. soch. v 12 tt. T. 2. M.: Pravda, 1982. 560 s.
14. Eko U. Prazhskoe kladbishche. – M.: Astrel': Corpus, 2011. – 560 s.
15. Aristotel'. Sobr. soch. v 4. tt. T 3. M.: Mysl', 1989. S. 59-263.
16. Gurevich P.S. Chelovek est' usilie byt' chelovekom… (Retsenziya na knigu izdatel'stva «Kanon+») // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. - 2014. - 2. - C. 85 - 93. DOI: 10.7256/2306-434X.2014.2.13008.
17. Gurevich P.S. Bessmertie na tom i na etom svete // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2015. - 10. - C. 983 - 987. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2015.10.16930.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
