|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Prokhorov M.M.
The ontology of being
// Philosophy and Culture.
2016. ¹ 3.
P. 320-336.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2016.3.16849 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=16849
Ïðîöåññóàëüíîñòü áûòèÿ
Prokhorov Mikhail Mikhailovich
Doctor of Philosophy
Professor, the department of History, Philosophy, Pedagogy and Psychology, Nizhny Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering; Professor, Shuya Branch of Ivanovo State University
603053, Russia, Nizhegorodskaya oblast', g. Nizhnii Novgorod, ul. Il'inskaya, 65, kab. 223
|
mmpro@mail.ru
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2016.3.16849
Received:
01-11-2015
Published:
20-05-2016
Abstract:
The subject of this research is the process of being. The article examines the four key problems. The first consists in the clarification of the philosophical concept and meaning of the “ontology of being”, its universal character, comparable to the fundamental philosophical category of being, as well as the concrete specificity of ontology in each sphere of being. In the second aspect the author reveals the ontology applied to all types of human-world relationship, and illustrates its various “projections”. Such connection is demonstrated in analyzing Hegel’s concept of ontology. The third aspect is detected in researching the content of the main categories that emerged in the history of philosophy: movement, development, activity, creativeness, and game. Each of them has its own content and volume. In this article the author suggests a generalized picture of the ontology of being, which is based on these categories. The fourth aspect is determined in the plane of being of actual human, his history, in which take place the current process of globalization, the establishment of the “global society”. Its central problem is a so-call problem of the “end of history”. The author believes that today the fundamental values of the dialectical-materialistic methodology are pushed back by the applied value of the knowledge that falls under the authority capital and officialdom, and becomes a commodity; scholars and thinkers turn into hired employees who produce this commodity; the values of fundamental science and philosophy are replaced by the growth number of whose who carry out a pragmatic-conjunctural orders. Scientific novelty consists in the revelation of such characteristics of ontology that lie in the foundation of the main types of human-world relationship and are determined by the variety of this relationship.
Keywords:
Being, Ontology, Non-being, Movement, Development, Activity, Game, Globalization, “End of history”, Worldview
References
1. Lukach D. K ontologii obshchestvennogo bytiya. Prolegomeny: Per. s nem. M.: Progress, 1991. S. 135-136.
2. Komarova V.Ya. Uchenie Zenona Eleiskogo: popytka rekonstruktsii sistemy argumentov. SPb.: Izd-vo Leningradskogo universiteta, 1988. 264 s.
3. Khaidegger M. Chto zovetsya myshleniem? M.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2007. 351 s.
4. Festyuzh'er Andre-Zhan. Sozertsanie i sozertsatel'naya zhizn' po Platonu. SPb.: Nauka, 2009. 497 s.
5. Prokhorov MM. Bytie i urovni ego opredeleniya // Filosofiya i obshchestvo. 2008. ¹ 4(52). S. 22-43.
6. Reale Dzh., Antiseri D. Zapadnaya filosofiya ot istokov do nashikh dnei. 1, Antichnost'. Sankt-Peterburg: Petropolis, 1994. S. 141.
7. Materialisticheskaya dialektika: v 5 tt. T. 1. Ob''ektivnaya dialektika. M.: Mysl', 1981. S. 96-99.
8. Lenin V.I. Filosofskie tetradi // Lenin V.I. Poln. sobr. soch. Izd. pyatoe. T. 29, M.: Politizdat, 1973. S. 130, 328-329.
9. Marks K. i Engel's F. Iz rannikh proizvedenii. M.: Gospolitizdat, 1956. S. 1-261.
10. Solodukho N.M. Filosofiya nebytiya. Kazan': Izd-vo Kazanskogo gos. tekhn. un-ta, 2002. 146 s.
11. Lem S. Nichto, ili Posledovatel'nost' // Lem S. Biblioteka XXI veka. M.: Izd-vo AST, 2002. S. 65-75.
12. Kutyrev V. A. Bytie ili nichto. SPb: Izdatel'stvo «Aleteiya», 2009. 496 s.
13. Yaspers K. Smysl i naznachenie istorii. Izd. 2. M.: Respublika, 1994. 527 s.
14. Ortega-i-Gasset Kh. Izbrannye trudy. M.: Ves' mir, 1997. 704 s.
15. Mikeshina L.A. Eklektika i sinkretizm: k voprosu o sistemnosti filosofskogo znaniya // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2013. T. XXXVIII. ¹ 4. S. 27-43.
16. Alekseev P.V. i Panin A.V. Filosofiya. 4-oe izd., pererab. i dop. M.: izd-vo Prospekt (MGU), 2013. S. 382-385.
17. Bulychev I.I., Pobedonostsev S.N. Kosmicheskii standart cheloveka. Tambov: OOO «Tsentr-press», 2015. 204 s.
18. Sagatovskii V.N. Konets ontologii? // Vestnik Rossiiskogo filosofskogo obshchestva. 2010. ¹ 4(56) . S. 92.
19. Viktor Aleksandrovich Shtoff i sovremennaya filosofiya nauki. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb, un-ta, 2006. S. 21.
20. Sviderskii V.I. Nekotorye voprosy dialektiki izmeneniya i razvitiya. M.: Mysl', 1965. S. 12-30.
21. Gegel'. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk: V 3 tt. T. 3. M.: Mysl', 1977. S. 89.
22. Kissel' M.A. Uchenie o dialektike v burzhuaznoi filosofii XX veka. L.: Izd-vo LGU, 1970. S. 9-10.
23. Gegel' Filosofiya religii v dvukh tomakh. T.2. M.: Mysl', 1977. S. 288, 332.
24. Kissel' M.A. Gegel' i sovremennyi mir. L.: Izd-vo LGU, 1982. S. 26-27.
25. Alekseev P.V., Panin A.V. Khrestomatiya po filosofii. Izd. 2-oe. M.: Gardariki, 1997. S. 25-28 (Filosofiya aktivistskaya i filosofiya sozertsatel'naya).
26. Marks K. Tezisy o Feierbakhe//Marks K. i Engel's F. Sochineniya. Izd. 2-oe. M.: Gospolitizdat, 1955. S. 1.
27. Prokhorov M.M. Osnovnye tipy mirovozzreniya. Pedagogicheskoe obozrenie. N. Novgorod: NIRO. ¹ 3, 1996. S. 18-27;
28. Prokhorov M.M. O tipakh vzaimootnoshenii cheloveka s mirom. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. Vyp. 2. Tambov, 1997. S. 32-38.
29. Orlov V.V. Chelovek, mir, mirovozzrenie. M.: Molodaya gvardiya, 1985. 222 s.
30. Zavadskii K.M., Kolchinskii E.I. Evolyutsiya evolyutsii: istoriko-kriticheskie ocherki problemy. L.: Izd-vo LGU, 1977; Kolchinskii E.I. Filosofsko-metodologicheskii analiz problemy «evolyutsii evolyutsii» – diss. na soisk. uch. st. doktora filos. nauk. L: LGU, 1986.
31. Gegel' G.V.F. Nauka logiki. V trekh tomakh. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1970. 501 s.
32. Belik A.P. Sotsial'naya forma dvizheniya. Yavleniya i sushchnost'. M.: Nauka, 1982. 270 s.
33. Il'enkov E.V. Kosmologiya dukha // Il'enkov E.V. Filosofiya i kul'tura. M.: Politizdat, 1991. S. 415-436.
34. Tsiolkovskii K.E. Ocherki o Vselennoi. Izd. 2-oe, dop. Kaluga: Zolotaya alleya. 2001. 384 s.
35. Fedorov N.F. Sobranie sochinenii v chetyrekh tomakh. M.: «Progress-Traditsiya», 1995-1999.
36. Khryapchenkova I.N. Chelovek v iskusstvennoi srede: dostizheniya i utraty. Nizhnii Novgorod. Izd-vo NNGU, 2003. S. 27-45.
37. Khyubner B. Martin Khaidegger – oderzhimyi bytiem. SPb.: Akademiya issledovaniya kul'tury, 2011. 172 s.
38. Gadamer Kh.-M. Istina i metod. Osnovy filosofskoi germenevtiki. M.: Progress, 1988. S. 147-174.
39. Shimel'fenig O.V. Zhivaya Vselennaya. Syuzhetno-igrovaya kartina mira. XXI vek: «Samozavet» ili «Samoapokalipsis»: Nauchnoe izdanie. Saratov, 2005. 688 s.
40. Mezhuev V.M. Istoricheskaya teoriya Marksa i sovremennost' // Filosofskoe soznanie: dramatizm obnovleniya. M.: Izd-vo politicheskoi literatury, 1991. 413 s.
41. Nosov N.A. Virtual'naya filosofiya // Nosov N.A. Virtual'naya psikhologiya. M.: Agraf, 2000. S. 7-53; Pronin M.A. Virtualistika v Institute cheloveka RAN. M.: IFRAN, 2015. 179 s.
42. Nikiforov A.L. Chto takoe «postneklassicheskaya nauka»? // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2013. T. XXXVI, ¹ 2, s. 63-64.
43. Prokhorov M.M. Ekonomizm kak modal'nost' beschelovechnosti // Mirovozzrencheskaya paradigma v filosofii: Modusy i modal'nosti prakticheskie i teoreticheskie: Monografiya / Pod red. prof. M.M. Prokhorova. – Nizhnii Novgorod: NF FGBOU VPO MESI, 2014. S. 188-210; Prokhorov M.M. Obshchestvo – ekonomika – ekonomizm // Filosofskaya mysl'. — 2014.-¹ 1.-S.113-163. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2014.1. 10630. URL: http://e-notabene. ru/fr/article _10630.html.
44. Mamchur E.A. Obrazy nauki v sovremennoi kul'ture. M., 2008. 400 s.
45. Popper K. Otkrytoe obshchestvo i ego vragi: v dvukh tomakh. T. 2. M.: Feniks, 1992. 522 s.
46. Buzgalin A.V., Kolganov A.I. Global'nyi kapital: v dvukh tomakh. T. 2. Izd. 3-e, ispr. i sushch. dop. M.: Lenand, 2015. 629 s.; Ovcharova E.V. Tvorchestvo kak modal'nost' sotsial'nogo blaga v sotsial'nykh proektakh//Mirovozzrencheskaya paradigma v filosofii: Modusy i modal'nosti teoreticheskie i prakticheskie. Monografiya/ Pod red. Prof. M.M. Prokhorova. Nizhnii Novgorod: Izd-vo NF MESI, 2014; Neravenstvo dokhodov i ekonomicheskii rost: strategii vykhoda iz krizisa / Pod redaktsiei A. Buzgalina, R. Traub-Mertsa, M. Voeikova. M: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2014. 406 s.
47. Prokhorov M.M. Filosofskie osnovaniya mirovozzreniya postneklassicheskoi epokhi. V 3 chastyakh, Ch. 2. Protivorechiya vtorogo osevogo vremeni. N. Novgorod: Izd-vo NF MESI, 2015. 210 s.
48. Fukuyama F. Konets istorii i poslednii chelovek. M.: «Ermak», 2004. S. 80-101.
49. Gadzhiev K.S., Primova E.N. Politologiya. M.: Infra, 2015. 384 s.
50. Gurevich P.S. Bytiistvennost' igry // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2014. - 9. - C. 905 - 908. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2014.9.12950.
51. Gurevich P.S. Igra kak odna iz granei chelovecheskogo bytiya // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2014. - 8. - C. 789 - 792. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2014.8.12501.
52. Prokhorov M.M. Sotsial'nost' myshleniya i ee negatsiya // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 324 - 334. DOI: 10.7256/2305-6177.2013.4.10086.
53. M. V. Shugurov Innovatsionnoe razvitie v sovremennom mire:
priroda i kontury disproportsii // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2012. - 8. - C. 37 - 52.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
