Ñòàòüÿ 'Âðåìÿ è ïðîñòðàíñòâî sub specie aeternitatis' - æóðíàë 'Ôèëîñîôèÿ è êóëüòóðà' - NotaBene.ru
ïî
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Âðåìÿ è ïðîñòðàíñòâî sub specie aeternitatis

Spektor David Mikhailovich

PhD in Architecture

Docent, the department of Architecture, Moscow State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering

109451 Russia, Moscow, 3-ya Kabelnaya 1

daspektor@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2016.8.16681

Received:

20-10-2015


Published:

16-10-2016


Abstract: This article examines the key definitions of time and space. It is demonstrated that if time in the XX century attains the character of the ultimate ontological foundation substantiating the corresponding interpretations, then space, which within the framework of physical theories meets time, in philosophical searches, on the contrary, counterpoises time. Space is endowed with the role of “reservoir” that is close to the role of “immanent dwell”. Mainly on the example of M. Heidegger’s philosophy, the author demonstrate the incorrectness of such approach and substantiates the need for the new ontology, which interprets the space itself as an ontological condition for materialization (fulfill). The scientific novelty consists in enhancing “spatiality” with ontological importance. The author is firs to underline the specificity of the initial homogeneity of space and time, the uniting ambivalence of the “movement towards integral” (homogenous), which in space is designated as aestheticism, and in time – the “establishment” and “agonal confrontation” (heterogeneous); which in space is manifested as expansion and assignment-assimilation, while in time as the tempo and speed of the “organic” interaction.


Keywords:

Transition, Rebirth, Being-towards-death, Magic, Body, Space, Strive, M. Heidegger’s philosophy, Being, Time

References
1. Gaidenko P.P. Vremya. Dlitel'nost'. Vechnost'. Problema vremeni v evropeiskoi filosofii i nauke. M.: «Progress-Traditsiya», 2006. 464 s.
2. Chernyakov A. G. Ontologiya vremeni. Bytie i vremya v filosofii Aristotelya, Gusserlya i Khaideggera. SPb.: «Vysshaya religiozno-filosofskaya shkola», 2001. 460 s.
3. Meletinskii B.M. Poetika mifa. 3-e izd., reprintnoe. M.: Izdatel'skaya firma «Vostochnaya literatura» RAN, 2000. 407 s.
4. Freidenberg O. M. Poetika syuzheta i zhanra. M., «Labirint», 1997. 448 s.
5. Eliade M. Ocherki sravnitel'nogo religiovedeniya. M.: «Ladomir». 1999. 488 s.
6. Malamud Sh. Ispech' mir : ritual i mysl' v drevnei Indii. M.: «Nauka». Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoi literatury, 2005. 350 s.
7. Tkachenko G. A. Kosmos, muzyka, ritual: Mif i estetika v «Lyui-shi chunydyu».— M.: «Nauka». Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoi literatury, 1990. 284 s.
8. Heidegger M. Sein und Zeit. Tubingen: Max Niemejer Verlag, 1960.
9. Kerschensteiner J. Kosmos. Munchen, 1962.
10. Fuko M. Slova i veshchi. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk. Spb.: «A-cad», 1994.
11. Toporov V. N. Prostranstvo i tekst // Tekst: Semantika i struktura. M.: «Nauka», 1983. 303 s.
12. Steblin-Kamenskii M.I. Mif. Leningrad: «Nauka», 1976. 104 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.