MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Shipovalova L.V.
The Modern Idea of the University and the Possible Legitimation of Philosophy
// Philosophy and Culture.
2015. № 11.
P. 1734-1741.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2015.11.16373 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=16373
Современная идея университета и возможная легитимация философии
Shipovalova Lada Vladimirovna
Doctor of Philosophy
Professor, the department of Philosophy of Science and Technology, Saint Petersburg State University
197110, Russia, g. Sagkt-Peterburg, ul. Bol'shaya Zelenina, 26, kv. 22
|
ladaship@gmail.com
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2015.11.16373
Received:
12-09-2015
Published:
17-01-2016
Abstract:
The subject of this article is the problem of the legitimation of philosophy and the importance of philosophy at a modern university. The aim is to understand the place of philosophy at a University determined in terms of various purposes of this institution – on the one hand, the use, effectiveness and efficiency; on the other hand, the search for truth. The first purpose is associated with private interests and the second one is associated with universal values. The researcher has used the methods of problematization and contextualization. A modern problem of the university is the ambiguity of its target orientation. Looking for a solution to the problem requires an appeal to the origin of the classical university and its philosophical basis: Humboldt’s provisions about the university reform and Kant’s justification of the role of the Faculty of Philosophy. The conclusion is that philosophy, following the interests of truth, is uniquely capable and, in fact, should carry out criticism as the definition of the boundaries and conditions of use for any knowledge any regulations. Such analysis allows to describe interaction of private and public interests as the purposes of a University and legitimizes a specific role of philosophy. This is a relevant issue for modern times.
Keywords:
faculty of philosophy, university, science, education, V. Humboldt, I. Kant, autonomy, private interest, modernity, criticism
References
1. Liotar Zh.F. Sostoyanie postmoderna. M.: Institut eksperimental'noi sotsiologii; SPb.: Aleteiya, 1998.-160 s.
2. Porter T. M. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.-325 p.
3. Mamardashvili M.K. Sovremennaya evropeiskaya filosofiya XX vek / Logos. 1991. №2. C. 109-130.
4. Fuko M. Chto takoe prosveshchenie // Stupeni. Peterburgskii al'manakh. SPb., 2000.-№ 1 (11).-C. 136-148.
5. Ridings B. Universitet v ruinakh. M.: Izdatel'skii dom GU VShE, 2010.-304 s.
6. Ustav SPbGU. [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://spbu.ru/images/ustav/Ustav-2012.pdf. (data obrashcheniya 1.07.2015).
7. Petrova G.I. Sovremennyi universitet: «mnozhestvennaya identichnost'» ili «ruiny» klassiki? // Vestnik Altaiskoi akademii ekonomiki i prava [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://journal-aael.intelbi.ru/main/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/117-120.pdf (data obrashcheniya 30.08.2015).
8. Parkhomenko R.N. Natsional'naya ideya i sovremennost' // NB: Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2012.-№ 1.-C.79-105. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4188.2012.1.135. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pp/article_135.html.
9. Rozin V.M. Stanovlenie novoi obrazovatel'noi formatsii // NB: Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2013.-№ 1.-C.1-43. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4188.2013.1.6445. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pp/article_6445.html.
10. Savvina O.V. Missiya universiteta // NB: Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2012.-№ 2.-C.155-179. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4188.2012.2.480. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pp/article_480.html
11. Andreev A. Yu. Rossiiskie universitety XVIII — pervoi poloviny XIX vekov v kontekste universitetskoi istorii Evropy. M.: Znak, 2009.-640 s.
12. Mittel'shtrass Yu. Budushchee nauki i nastoyashchee universiteta // Logos. 2013.-№1 (91).-C.100-121.
13. Gumbol'dt V. O vnutrennei i vneshnei organizatsii vysshikh nauchnykh zavedenii v Berline // Neprikosnovennyi zapas.-2002.-№2 (22)-C. 5-10.
14. Nikol'skii V. Universitetskaya svoboda i akademicheskaya avtonomiya // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii.-2013.-№ 6.-C. 147-155.
15. Veber M. Nauka kak prizvanie i professiya // Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya.-M.: Progress, 1990.-C. 707-735.
16. Shnedel'bakh G. Universitet Gumbol'dta // Logos.-2002.-# 5-6. (35.-C.65-78.
17. Kant I. Spor fakul'tetov. Kaliningrad: Izdatel'stvo KGU, 2006.-286 s.
18. Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti // Kant I. Kritika prakticheskogo razuma. SPb.: Nauka, 1995. S. 53-120.
19. Adorno T.V. Dlya chego eshche filosofiya // Topos.-2012.-№ 1.-S. 14-26.
20. Gurevich P.S. Obrazovanie i budushchee cheloveka // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2013.-2.-C. 104-113. DOI: 10.7256/2306-434X.2013.2.9123.
21. Rozin V.M. Filosofiya upravleniya kak refleksiya nad obshchestvennymi protsessami i prakticheskaya distsiplina // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-8.-C. 53-63.
22. Popkova N.V. Filosofskaya kul'tura ili filosofskaya tekhnologiya? // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2015. - 2. - C. 133 - 144. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2015.2.14209.
23. Skorkin O.A. Znachimost' gumanitarnoi komponenty obrazovaniya v tekhnicheskikh vuzakh // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. - 2013. - 4. - C. 288 - 295. DOI: 10.7256/2306-434X.2013.4.10807.
24. // . - . - . - C. - . URL:
25. // . - . - . - C. - . URL:
26. // . - . - . - C. - . URL:
27. // . - . - . - C. - . URL:
28. // . - . - . - C. - . URL:
29. // . - . - . - C. - . URL:
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
