Статья 'Индивидуализм и аполитичность в условиях культуры потребления' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Индивидуализм и аполитичность в условиях культуры потребления

Il'in Alexey Nikolaevich

PhD in Philosophy

associate professor of the Department of Practical Psychology at Omsk State Pedagogical University

644086, Russia, g. Omsk, ul. 33-1 severnaya, 122, kv. 35

ilin1983@yandex.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2016.6.16367

Received:

11-09-2015


Published:

27-07-2016


Abstract: Abstract. The culture of consumption in recent years has become the dominant type of culture in Russia and in Western countries. Accordingly, it is the object of study of sociologists and philosophers. Culturologists, psychologists. However, so far not established a unified theory of consumerism and not understood that a wide array of risks and threats to humans and society, which are the result of the spread of consumer culture. The problem of the article is associated with the comprehension of values impact of consumerism on the rise of individualism and the weakening of political activity. This influence is the subject of the research. As a theoretical-methodological basis of the study used the theory of the sociology of consumption, philosophy of culture and social philosophy of modern Russian and foreign authors. Scientific novelty is expressed in the following provisions. Social atomization and de-politicization associated with an increase in consumer values. The consumer is limited to interests that relate to his personal life. Is rejection of membership in the unifying political General. Place moral obligations, social relations is autonomy. The culture of consumption performs a call to an individual activity but a social inaction. The deconsolidation and individualization are associated with the loss of ideological, political and civil installations. The permanent revolution of individualism, expressed in the relevant changes of culture and values, eliminates political activism, political discourse displaces from consciousness. Global social projects and metanarratives prefer micronarrative and microprojects personal fate. "Social person" gives way to the "individual person", a politically active citizen surrenders to consumers, civil society – in front of the consumer. When the deconsolidation becomes widespread, there is a paradoxical phenomenon of "social exclusion of the majority".


Keywords:

consumer culture, political apathy, deconsolidation, consumer society, individualism, solidarity, atomization, micronarrative, value orientation, project

References
1. Arendt Kh. Chto est' svoboda? // Voprosy filosofii №4, 2014. S. 32–49.
2. Balatskii E.V. Kontseptsiya tekuchei real'nosti Z. Baumana i ee prilozheniya // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' №3, 2011. S. 134–146.
3. Bauman Z. Individualizirovannoe obshchestvo / Per. s angl. pod red. V.L.Inozemtseva. M.: Logos, 2005. – 390 s.
4. Bauman Z. Rasskazannye zhizni i prozhitye istorii // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya №1, 2004. S. 5–14.
5. Bauman Z. Tekuchaya sovremennost' / Per. s angl. pod red. Yu. V. Asochakova. SPb.: Piter, 2008. – 240 s.
6. Vizgin V.P. Russkaya filosofiya segodnya (Razmyshleniya o seminare i knige) // Voprosy filosofii №12, 2014. S. 118–129.
7. Voskanyan M.V. Igra v individualizirovannom obshchestve // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost' №2, 2009. S. 170–176.
8. Votintseva N.N., Il'in A.N. Kul'tura potrebleniya i reklama: monografiya. Perm': PIEF, 2014. – 132 s.
9. Deviantnost' v obshchestve potrebleniya: Kollektivnaya monografiya. Pod red. Ya.I. Gilinskogo i T.V. Shipunovoi. SPb.: Izdatel'skii Dom «Alef-Press», 2012. – 464 s.
10. Evlampiev I.I. Aktual'nye uroki russkogo liberalizma. Stat'ya pervaya: kritika zapadnoi traditsii // Voprosy filosofii №6, 2015. S. 90–99.
11. Zvezdkina E.F. Rets. na kn. A.A. Guseinov. Velikie proroki i mysliteli. Nravstvennye ucheniya ot Moiseya do nashikh dnei // Voprosy filosofii №11, 2010. S. 173–178.
12. Zinov'ev A.A. Russkaya tragediya. – M.: Algoritm, 2014. – 464 s.
13. Ivanov P.V. Potreblenie kak agent legkoi sotsial'nosti v gorodskom prostranstve // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noi antropologii №5 (58), 2011. Tom XIV. S. 142–147.
14. Il'in A.N. Dekonsolidatsiya i depolitizatsiya, kharakternye dlya obshchestva potrebleniya // Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal №3, 2014. S. 101–115.
15. Il'in A.N. Kul'tura, stremyashchayasya v nikuda: kriticheskii analiz potrebitel'skikh tendentsii: monografiya. Nauch. red. D.M. Fedyaev. Omsk: Izd-vo OmGPU, 2012. – 266 s.
16. Il'in A.N. Kul'tura obshchestva massovogo potrebleniya: kriticheskoe osmyslenie: monografiya. Omsk: Izd-vo OmGPU, 2014. – 208 s.
17. Il'in A.N. Sotsial'naya dekonsolidatsiya i depolitizatsiya v epokhu potrebleniya // Uchenye zapiski Komsomol'skogo-na-Amure gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Nauki o cheloveke, obshchestve i kul'ture № 1(17), 2014. T.2. S. 71–77.
18. Interv'yu redaktsii zhurnala «Voprosy filosofii» s N.I. Lapinym v svyazi s 80-letiem // Voprosy filosofii №12, 2011. S. 3–9.
19. Kaminskaya I. Kak nam ne razrushit' Rossiyu, kotoruyu my ne poteryali. URL: http://www.yburlan.ru/biblioteka/kak-nam-ne-razrushit-rossiyu-kotoruyu-my-ne-poteryali (data obrashcheniya: 17.11.2014)
20. Kukartseva M.A., Dmitrieva I.A. Politicheskoe kak esteticheskoe // Voprosy filosofii 7, 2015. S. 17-27.
21. Lipovetski Zh. Era pustoty. SPb.: «Vladimir Dal'», 2001. – 332 s.
22. Naumenko L.K. B.F. Slavin. Ideologiya vozvrashchaetsya // Voprosy filosofii 9, 2010. S. 184–188.
23. Nosov D.M. Khanna Arendt – filosof? // Voprosy filosofii №4, 2014. S. 25–31.
24. Pavlova O.N. Tsivilizatsionnyi fenomen nartsissizma: vektory ob''ektivatsii v paradigme psikhoanaliza // Voprosy filosofii №6, 2010. S. 20–32.
25. Sanina A.G. Informatsionnoe obshchestvo i gosudarstvennaya identichnost' // Informatsionnoe obshchestvo №6, 2013. S. 9–15.
26. Semenov E.V., Prokop'eva M.Yu. Patriotizm i potreblenie // Real'nost'. Chelovek. Kul'tura: transformatsiya bytiya cheloveka v obshchestve potrebleniya. VI Orekhovskie chteniya: materialy Vseros. nauch. konf. (Omsk, 24 oktyabrya 2014 g.). Omsk: Izd-vo OmGPU, 2014. S. 133–137.
27. Tabachkov A.S. Informatsionnoe obshchestvo v kontekste istorii // Voprosy filosofii №10, 2014. S. 37–45.
28. Shikhardin N.V. Anri Lefevr o byurokraticheskom obshchestve, kontroliruemom kons'yumerizmom // Real'nost'. Chelovek. Kul'tura: transformatsiya bytiya cheloveka v obshchestve potrebleniya. VI Orekhovskie chteniya: materialy Vseros. nauch. konf. (Omsk, 24 oktyabrya 2014 g.). Omsk: Izd-vo OmGPU, 2014. S. 173–176.
29. Žižek S. Against Human Rights // New Left Review, 34, July-August 2005. Pp. 115–131.
30. Golenok G.V. Individualizm kak mifologiya // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2010.-1.-C. 73-78.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.