Статья 'Социально-конструкционистский подход к сознанию в контексте классической и современной философии' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Социально-конструкционистский подход к сознанию в контексте классической и современной философии

Trufanova Elena Olegovna

PhD in Philosophy

Senior Scientific Associate, Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences

119002, Russia, Moscow, Gagarinskiy Pereulok 16

eltrufanova@gmail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2016.6.16094

Received:

10-08-2015


Published:

27-07-2016


Abstract:   The subject of this research is the approach towards the problems of consciousness, self-consciousness and the I within the framework of such direction of the modern humanitarian sciences as social constructionism. The main goal is examination of the main positions of this approach towards consciousness and its various manifestations from the perspective of this direction and placement of this approach into the context of other research of consciousness in classical and contemporary philosophy. Socio-constructivist approach to consciousness makes a strong accent on the role of social constructions in formation of consciousness and self-consciousness of an individual and leans towards denial of the existence of the I. However, criticizing social constructionism, the author demonstrates that the presence of common experience among all subjects does not depend on social constructs. At the same time, a positive feature of the socio-constructivist approach to consciousness is favorable for understanding of position of an individual within the modern information era. Author’s special contribution consists in determination of the intersecting points of social constructionism with other approaches to consciousness in classical and contemporary philosophy. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that in Russian philosophy there are in fact no works dedicated to the socio-constructivist approach to the problems of consciousness.  


Keywords:

consciousness, self-consciousness, social constructionism, I, narrative, discourse, dialogue, communication, nature vs upbringing, personal identity

References
1. Chalmers D. Soznayushchii um: V poiskakh fundamental'noi teorii. M.: URSS, 2013. 509 s.
2. Trufanova E.O. Sotsial'nyi konstruktsionizm v teorii poznaniya: istoki, problematika, sovremennyi potentsial // Epistemologiya: perspektivy razvitiya. M.: Kanon-Plyus, 2012. S.389-400.
3. Trufanova E.O. O preimushchestvakh i nedostatkakh sotsial'nogo konstruktsionizma // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2015. № 1. S.32-36.
4. Trufanova E.O. Politicheskoe vs epistemologicheskoe: relyativizm v sotsial'nom konstruktsionizme i feministskoi filosofii // Relyativizm kak bolezn' sovremennoi filosofii. M.: Kanon-Plyus, 2015. S.228-264.
5. Trufanova E.O. Dilemma «Nature vs nurture» v stanovlenii lichnostnykh kharakteristik Ya // Poznanie i soznanie v mezhdistsiplinarnoi perspektive. Ch.2. M.: IF RAN, 2014. S.27-67.
6. Marks K. Nemetskaya ideologiya // Marks K., Engel's F. Sochineniya. Izd. 2oe. T.3. M., 1955. S.7-544.
7. Marks K. Tezisy o Feierbakhe // Marks K., Engel's F. Sochineniya. Izd. 2oe. T.3. M., 1955. S.1-4.
8. Fromm E. Marksova kontseptsiya cheloveka. M., 1992. [Elektronnyi resurs] – Elektron. dan. Rezhim dostupa: http://psylib.ukrweb.net/books/fromm01/index.htm-Zagl. s ekrana.
9. Lektorskii V.A. Ya // Epistemologiya klassicheskaya i neklassicheskaya. M.: URSS, 2001. S.173-184.
10. Yum D. Traktat o chelovecheskoi prirode // Yum D. Soch.: V 2 t. T.1. M., 1996. C.53-656.
11. Makh E. Analiz oshchushchenii i otnoshenie fizicheskogo k psikhicheskomu. M.: Izdatel'skii dom «Territoriya budushchego», 2005. 304 c.
12. Fuko M. Chto takoe avtor? // Fuko M. Volya k istine: po tu storonu znaniya, vlasti i seksual'nosti. Raboty raznykh let. M.: Kastal', 1994. S. 9–46.
13. Fuko M. Slova i veshchi. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk. SPb.: A-cad, 1994. 408 c.
14. Bart R. Smert' avtora // Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika. M.: Progress, 1994. S. 384–391.
15. Deleuze G., Guattari F. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press, 1983. 400 pp.
16. Fuko M. Volya k istine: po tu storonu znaniya, vlasti i seksual'nosti. Raboty raznykh let. M.: Kastal', 1994. 448 c.
17. Fuko M. Arkheologiya znaniya. SPb.: ITs «Gumanitarnaya Akademiya»; Universitetskaya kniga (Seriya «Au Pura. Frantsuzskaya kollektsiya»), 2004. 416 c.
18. Derrida Zh. O grammatologii / Per. s fr. i vst. st. N. Avtonomovoi. M.: Ad Marginem, 2000. 512 c.
19. Lokk D. Opyt o chelovecheskom razumenii // Lokk D. Sochineniya v 3-kh t. T.1. M.: Mysl', 1985. C.78-582.
20. Williams B. Personal Identity and Individuation // Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, № 67, 1957. P. 229-252.
21. Parfit D. Personal Identity, Philosophical Review, Vol. 80, 1971.; Reasons and Persons. Oxford, 1984. P.3-27.
22. Shoemaker S. Self-Knowledge and Self-Identity. London: Oxford University Press, 1963. 276 pp.
23. Quinton A. The Soul // The Journal of Philosophy, Vol.59, No.15. July 1962. P.393-409.
24. Perry J. A Dialogue on Personal Identity and Immortality. Indianapolis, 1978. 56 pp.
25. Grice H.P. Personal Identity // Mind, № 50, 1941. P.330-350.
26. Vygotskii L.S. Myshlenie i rech'. Izd. 5, ispr. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Labirint», 1999. 352 s.
27. Vitgenshtein L. Filosofskie issledovaniya. M.: AST, 2011. 320 s.
28. Whorf B. L. Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. New York: Wiley, 1956. 290 pp.
29. Harré R. Personal Being: A Theory for Individual Psychology. N.-Y.: Harward University Press, 1984. 304 pp.
30. Harré R. Language games and the texts of identity // J.Shotter and K.J.Gergen (eds) Texts of Identity, London: Sage, 1989. P.20-35.
31. Burr V. An Introduction to Social Constructionism. London, N.-Y.: Routledge, 1995. 208 p.
32. Dzherdzhen K.Dzh. Tekhnologiya i Ya: ot sushchnostnogo k vozvyshennomu // Sotsial'naya psikhologiya: samorefleksiya marginal'nosti. M.: INION RAN, 1995. C.90-106.
33. Gergen K.G. The Saturated Self: Dilemmas of Identity In Contemporary Life. N.-Y.: Basic Books, 2000. 320 pp.
34. Harré R. The Singular Self. An Introduction to the Psychology of Personhood. London, Thousand Oaks, New Dehli, 1998. 208 pp.
35. Dzherdzhen K.Dzh. Mesto psikhiki v skonstruirovannom mire // Sotsial'naya psikhologiya: samorefleksiya marginal'nosti. M.: INION RAN, 1995. S. 48-73.
36. Sarbin, T.R. The narrative as root metaphor for psychology // Narrative Psychology: The Storied Nature of Human Conduct, New York: Praeger, 1986. P.3-21.
37. Bakhtin M.M. Avtor i geroi v esteticheskoi deyatel'nosti // Bakhtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. Izd. 2-e. M.: Iskusstvo, 1986. S.7-180.
38. Bakhtin M.M. Problema rechevykh zhanrov // Bakhtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. M., 1979. S.237-280.
39. Hermans H. J. M., Kempen H. J. G., van Loon R. J. P. The dialogical self: Beyond individualism and rationalism. American Psychologist, 47, 1992. P.23-33.
40. Dzherdzhen K.Dzh. Sotsial'naya psikhologiya kak sotsial'noe konstruirovanie: stanovlenie vzglyada // Sotsial'naya psikhologiya: samorefleksiya marginal'nosti. M.: INION RAN, 1995. C.31-47.
41. Dzherdzhen K.Dzh. Upadok i krushenie lichnosti // Sotsial'naya psikhologiya: samorefleksiya marginal'nosti. M.: INION RAN, 1995. C.107-115.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.