MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Paleeva N.N.
Reverses of Cultural Self-Identity
// Philosophy and Culture.
2015. № 9.
P. 1354-1362.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2015.9.15756 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=15756
Превратности культурной самотождественности
Paleeva Natal'ya Nikolaevna
Doctor of Philosophy
professo of the Department of Theory of Culture, Ethics and Aesthetics at Moscow State University of Culture and Arts
141406, Russia, Moscow Region, Khimki, str. Bibliotechnaya, 7
|
natalia@paleeva.ru
|
|
|
Other publications by this author |
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2015.9.15756
Received:
04-07-2015
Published:
1-4.32-2015
Abstract:
Definition of the essence of culture is often taken as a simple task. However, in her article Paleeva demonstrates that in the process of searching for self-identity, culture faces serious contradictions which reflects the complex nature of the phenomenon itself. Thus, even etymology of the word 'culture' hides in itself the following variants of cultural existence. Even more paradoxes are associated with the process of culture genesis. In one case, culture is viewed as the generation of nature and earthly circumstances of human life which was later developed further. In the other case, culture is associated with the word 'cult' which relates this phenonomenon to the transcendental feeling. In her research Paleeva has used the methodology of philosophy of culture. This branch of knowledge has accumulated numerous methods and procedures that allow to analyse oppositions to culture. For the first time in Russian academic literature the author of the article is viewing complexities of cultural self-identity. The author also makes an attempt to analyze contradictions between ethic cultures and universal cultures, local cultures and general cultures. The author compares the two research tendencies that have developed in contemporary science. She also carries out a critical analysis of the other researchers' attempts to view primordialism as plain antiques and to give a negative assessment of that tradition from the point of view of the social progress. Meanwhile, many authors speak highly of constructivism as the newest achievement of philosophy and science. In her article Paleeva also provides a critical analysis of peculiarities of modern constructivism.
References
1. Terri Iglton. Ideya kul'tury / Per. s angl. I. Kushnarevoi. M.: Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2012.
2. Florenskii P.A. Iz bogoslovskogo naslediya // Bogoslovskie trudy. Vyp. 17. M., 1977.
3. Grechko P.K. Ontometodologicheskii diskurs sovremennosti. Istoricheskaya podvinutost' i ee vyzovy. M.: URSS, 2015. 301 s.
4. Zhizhek Slavoi. Shchekotlivyi sub''ekt: otsutstvuyushchii tsentr politicheskoi ontologii / Per. s angl. S. Shchukinoi. M.: Izd. dom «Delo», 2014. 526 s.
5. Safonov A. Natsiya i etnos, kak sushchnostno razlichnye sotsial'nye fenomeny: novaya paradigma sotsiogeneza // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. № 7(79). S. 1006-1012.
6. Brubeiker R. Etnichnost' bez grupp / Per. s angl. I. Borisovoi. M.: Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2012. 408 s.
7. Spirova E.M. Utrachennaya samotozhdestvennost'. O knige R. Brubeiker «Etnichnost' bez grupp» // Vestnik analitiki. 2013. № 3(53). S. 155-158.
8. Rorty R. Human Rights, Rationality, and Sentimentallity // The Politics of Human Rights / O. Slavic (ed.). L., 1999.
9. Gurevich P.S. Filosofiya kul'tury. M.: Aspekt-Press, 1995. 181 s.
10. Gurevich P.S., Paleeva N.N. Filosofiya kul'tury. 2-e izd., dop. M.: «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2014. 424 s.
11. Moren Edgar. Metod. Priroda prirody / Per. s frants. E.N. Knyazevoi. M.: «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2013. 487 s.
12. Spirova E.M. Filosofsko-antropologicheskoe soderzhanie simvola. M.: «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2012. 336 s
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|