Статья '«Семантическая поэтика» как онтологическое ядро неоакмеизма и философско-культурная парадигма ХХ-ХХI вв' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

«Семантическая поэтика» как онтологическое ядро неоакмеизма и философско-культурная парадигма ХХ-ХХI вв

Fetisova Ekaterina Eduardovna

PhD in Philology

Doctor's Degree student of the Department of Philosophy at Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences (INION) under the Russian Academy of Sciences

117418, Russia, Moscow, str. Nakhimovsky Prospekt, 51/21

slabkih.ksenia@yandex.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2016.7.15568

Received:

11-06-2015


Published:

07-09-2016


Abstract: This article is determined to give a universal definition of “semantic poetry” as a philosophical-cultural phenomenon of the XX century and as a “cumulative center” of neo-Acmeist paradigm, trace its conceptually oriented towards the Antiquity origin, dialogues of Socrates and Plato, peculiarities of the chronotope, creative evolution and boundaries, which in turn means classification of methodology and principles of its artistic-historical reconstruction. Thus, this research is an attempt to build a philosophical-cultural paradigm of neo-Acmeism, as well as certain universal methodology of hermeneutic analysis of poetry (W. Dilthey)in the context of synergetic coexistence of philosophy and philology (literary science). The author makes the appropriate conclusion that in “semantic poetry” of neo-Acmeism there are certain stable ontological constants (individualism, anthropocentrism, rebirth of cultural archetypes and mythologems of the past, universalism of poetic innovations, etc.), in other words, an inner mental “code” which considers individuality of the each separate poet-creator, but at the same time does not allow the philosophical-cultural paradigm to diffuse (Y. M. Lotman), but rather at times combine within its boundaries the completely different creators, giving the paradigm longevity and sustainability throughout the XX-XXI centuries. Such “code” becomes its value-conceptual constant, justifying the succession and uniqueness of its development as an integral research strategy, which allows reconstructing the philosophical-cultural paradigm of neo-Acmeism in the constantly updating historical context over and over.


Keywords:

Cultural code, Philosophy of life, Ontological concept, Sense-originating semantics, Metatext , Philosophical-cultural paradigm, Semantic poetry, Mythology, Phenomenology, Neo-Acmeism

References
1. Akhmatova A. Sobr. soch. V 6 t. T. 3. M.: Ellis Lak, 1998.
2. Struve P. Slovo i Dukh. Parizh: YMCA-Press, 1981.
3. Kikhnei L.G. Poeziya Anny Akhmatovoi. Tainy remesla. M.: MAKS Press, 1997.
4. Kikhnei L.G., Fomenko O.E. «Tak molyus' za Tvoei liturgiei…»: Khristianskaya vera i poeziya Anny Akhmatovoi. M.: MAKS Press, 2000.
5. Levin Yu.I., Segal D.M., Timenchik R.D., Toporov V.N., Tsiv'yan T.V. Russkaya semanticheskaya kul'turnaya paradigma // Russian Literature (Hague). 1974. № 7-8. R. 49-50.
6. Khalizev V.E. Teoriya literatury. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 2005.
7. Esin A.B. Vremya i prostranstvo // Vvedenie v literaturovedenie. Ucheb. posobie / Pod red. L.V. Chernets. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 2000.
8. Gusserl' E. // Spirkin A.G. Filosofiya: Uchebnik. M.: Gardariki, 2006.
9. Musatov V.V. «V to vremya ya gostila na zemle…». Lirika Anny Akhmatovoi. M.: Slovari.ru, 2009.
10. Sluzhevskaya I. Kitezhanka. Poeziya Akhmatovoi: Tridtsatye gody. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2008.
11. Remizov A. Dnevnik. Zapis' ot 19 noyabrya 1955 g. // Kodryanskaya N. Aleksei Remizov. Parizh: YMCA-Press, 1959.
12. Kanke V.A. Filosofiya: Istoricheskii i sistematicheskii kurs. M.: Logos, 2006.
13. Antologiya akmeizma: Stikhi. Manifesty. Stat'i. Zametki. Memuary / Vstup. stat'ya, sost. i primechaniya T.A. Bek. M.: AST, 1997.
14. Peterburgskie sny Anny Akhmatovoi / Sost., vstup. stat'ya, rekonstruktsiya teksta i komment. S.A. Kovalenko. SPb.: Rostok, 2004.
15. Timenchik R.D. Zametki ob akmeizme // Russian Literature. Amsterdam. 1974. № 7-8.
16. Lekmanov O.A. Akmeisty // Kritika russkogo postsimvolizma / Sost., vstupit. st., preambuly i primech. O.A. Lekmanova. M.: Olimp; AST, 2002.
17. Struve Gleb. O.E. Mandel'shtam. Opyt biografii i kriticheskogo kommentariya // Mandel'shtam O.E. Sobr. soch. N'yu-Iork, 1955.
18. Lekmanov O.A. Kniga ob akmeizme. M.: Moskovskii kul'turologicheskii Litsei, 1998.
19. Chervinskaya O. Akmeizm v kontekste serebryanogo veka i traditsii. Chernovtsy; Ruta, 1997.
20. Pakhareva T.A. Opyt akmeizma (akmeisticheskaya sostavlyayushchaya sovremennoi russkoi poezii). Kiev: Parlament. izd-vo, 2004.
21. Skryabina T. Akmeizm // Entsiklopediya «KRUGOSVET». M.: Progress-Pleyada, 2008.
22. Kikhnei L.G. Filosofsko-esteticheskie printsipy akmeizma i khudozhestvennaya praktika Osipa Mandel'shtama. M.: Dialog-MGU, 1997
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.