Статья 'Философские основания и методологические ресурсы новой парадигмы сложности ' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Философские основания и методологические ресурсы новой парадигмы сложности

Aseeva Irina

Doctor of Philosophy

professor of the Department of Philosophy and Social Studies at South-West State University 

305040, Russia, Kursk Region, Kursk, str. 50 Let, 94, of. 513

irinaaseeva2011@yandex.ru
Mayakova Anna

post-graduate student of the Department of Philosophy and Social Studies at South-West State University

305040, Russia, Kursk Region, Kursk, str. 50 Let, 94, of. 509

berryannett@yandex.ru

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2015.8.15455

Received:

01-06-2015


Published:

1-3.84-2015


Abstract: In their articles Aseeva and Mayakova examine the systems approach and the theory of complexity based on the research 'Complexity and Philosophy' of 2007 conducted by foreign scientists Frencis Heylighen, Paul Cilliers and Carlos Gershenson and published by the British publishing as 'Complexity, Science and Society' (Radcliffe, Oxford). The research was presented in mass media in English and adapted by the authors of the present article. In this article they analyze the prerequisites for creating the systems (interdisciplinary) approach and the theory of complexity and trace back the historical development of the new paradigm of complexity focusing on its philosophical grounds. In their research the authors of the article have used the methodology of postnonclassical science and the theory of complexity as the most universal meta languages used for describing complex self-developing systems. An important element of the methodological tools applied in the article is the analysis of foreign discourses on the theory of complexity and philosophical concept of quality. The main conclusions of the research are the following: the authors defined the grounds for the modern theory of complexity, described the main categories and parameters of the theory of complexity and formulated the central paradigm of this science. Thus, the theory of chaos and quantum mechanics have thrown down a challenge to determinism. Reductionism has been replaced with the systems theory based on scientific holism. Cybernetics and post-modernist social studies have demonstrated that knowledge is subjective. These premises have all been gathered under the title 'science of complexity'. The central paradigm of this science is the system of the multi-agent. Subjectivity and doubts are attributive to agents and their local interactions create the global organization. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the authors provide 'qualitative' argumenation of the main provisions of the theory of complexity as well as integration of the ideas of different philosophers, in particular, post-modernists, that create the basis for further assimilation of the paradigm of complexity in philosophy. According to the authors of the article, this would cast light on the existing philosophical issues such as origin of the universe, organization of the society, structuralism of items and phenomena. The research has been supported by the Russian Science Foundation (the project No. 15-18-10013). 


Keywords:

holism, emergent, Gershenson Carlos, Cilliers Paul, Heylighen Frencis, category of quality, philosophy of science, chaos theory, complexity, systems approach

References
1. Aseeva I.A., Mayakova A.V. Paradigma slozhnosti v proektsii na sovremennuyu filosofiyu // Modern philosophic paradigms: interrelation of traditions and innovative approaches: materials of the II international scientific conference on March 3–4, 2015. Prague: Vědeckovydavatelské centrum "Sociosféra-CZ", pp. 16-19.
2. Gershenson C., Heylighen F. How can we think the complex? in: Richardson, Kurt (ed.) Managing the Complex Vol. 1: Philosophy // Theory and Application.(Institute for the Study of Coherence and Emergence/Information Age Publishing), 2005.pp.47-62.
3. Heylighen F., Cilliers P., Gershenson C. Complexity and Philosophy // Complexity, Science and Society (Radcliffe, Oxford), 2007. Pp. 41-71.
4. Turchin V. Cybernetics and Philosophy, in: The Cybernetics of Complex Systems, F. Geyer (ed.), (Intersystems, Salinas, California). 1990. Pp. 61-74.
5. Prigogine I. and Stengers I. The end of certainty: time, chaos and the new laws of nature – New York: Free Press. 1997.
6. Aristotel'. Metafizika. Rostov n/D.: Feniks, 1999. 601s.
7. Gegel' G.V.F. Nauka logiki. SPB.: Nauka, 1997. 800 s.
8. Mayakova A.V. Genezis i razvitie filosofii kachestva // Aktual'nye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk. №12 (71) Ch.I 2014. S. 258-260.
9. Mayakova A.V., Mayakov A.S. Realizatsiya trebovanii standartov ISO serii 9000 // Diskussiya. №9 (27). 2012. S. 59-64.
10. Kamenskii E.G. Ekzistentsial'nye riski innovatsionnoi paradigmy postindustrial'nogo razvitiya sotsiuma // Gumanitarnye nauki i obrazovanie. 2012. № 4 (12). S. 78-82.
11. Khodyrevskaya S.V., Mayakova A.V. Upravlenie riskami v sfere uslug // Metody menedzhmenta kachestva. 2013. №2. S. 32-38.
12. Bunge M Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Volume 4. Ontology II A World of Systems // Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel. 1979.
13. Heylighen F. & Joslyn C. Cybernetics and Second Order Cybernetics // R.A. Meyers (ed.), Encyclopedia of Physical Science& Technology (3rd ed.), Vol. 4, (Academic Press, New York), 2001. pp. 155-170.
14. Waldrop, M. M. Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos // London: Viking. 1992.
15. Budanov V.G. Sinergeticheskaya metodologiya forsaita i modelirovaniya slozhnogo // Slozhnost'. Razum. Postneklassika. 2013. № 1. S. 13-24.
16. Mayakova A.V. Stoimost' kachestva predostavleniya konsaltingovykh uslug // Problemy ekonomiki i menedzhmenta. №4 (8). 2012. S. 91-94.
17. Arshinov V.I., Budanov V.G. Soznanie i osoznanie v sinergetike // Sinergetika na rubezhe XX-XXI vv. Sb. nauchnykh trudov. Ser. "Problemy filosofii" Tsentr gumanitarnykh nauch.-inform. issledovanii. Otdel filosofii; Otv. red. Panchenko A.I.. MOSKVA, 2006. S. 55-73.
18. Taylor, M. C. The Moment of Complexity: Emerging Network Culture. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.2003.
19. Budanov V.G., Kurdyumov V.S., Punda D.I. Upravlenie slozhnost'yu, vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya v sovremennykh usloviyakh // Ekonomicheskie strategii. 2014. T. 16. № 2 (118). S. 90-97.
20. Knyazeva E.N. Evolyutsionnoe myshlenie v nauke i filosofii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2013. - 11. - C. 1532 - 1542. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.11.9923.
21. E.N. Knyazeva Liki slozhnogo mira // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2010. - 4. - C. 45 - 55.
22. Loktionov M.V. Filosofsko-metodologicheskie printsipy kriticheskoi teorii i kriticheskogo sistemnogo podkhoda v sovremennykh traktovkakh obshchestvennykh protsessov.
// Filosofskaya mysl'. - 2014. - 10. - C. 48 - 79. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2014.10.13732. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_13732.html

23. I.A. Aseeva Mnogoobrazie i edinstvo prognosticheskogo opyta // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2010. - 6. - C. 8 - 13.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.