Статья 'Культура как объект исследования в современном социогуманитарном знании: проблема выживаемости категории' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Культура как объект исследования в современном социогуманитарном знании: проблема выживаемости категории

Popov Evgeniy Aleksandrovich

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor of the Department of Sociology and Conflictology of Altai State University

656038, Russia, Barnaul, 66 Dimitrova str., room 513А

popov.eug@yandex.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2015.10.15264

Received:

12-05-2015


Published:

1-4.8-2015


Abstract: The subject of the present research is the category of culture as it is used in social studies and humanities. The author of the article pays attention to the fact that culture is the most frequent research subject in all kinds of sciences. Somehow this makes a researcher lose his intuition and the academic community to feel confused about what 'culture' is meant in a research in particular. This is what has formed the basis for the present research. Indeed, the question about whether the category of culture survives the methodic doubts is highly important. Every scientist has his own understanding of culture and therefore applies his own practices to such research and this is the circumstance that emphasizes the need for scientists to reach a certain agreement regarding the definition of culture. In his research Popov has used  mostly the comparative method that allows to answer the question about the survival of the category of culture taking into account the trends of modern philosophy, cultural studies and sociology. The main conclusions of the research are the following: 1) socio-humanitarian sciences need to universalize thecategory of culture; 2) philosophy, cultural studies and sociology are the disciplines where the problem of the category's survival is especially pressing and therefore representatives of these sciences need to agree on a common definition of culture in their researches. 


Keywords:

culture, society, philosophy, cultural studies, sociology, cognition, people, values, science, civilization

References
1. Kamoza T. M. Diskurs kul'turnoi travmy: metodologicheskii potentsial novogo podkhoda k issledovaniyu filosofskoi mysli epokhi imperskoi modernizatsii Rossii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. № 10. S. 1458-1469.
2. Alekseeva I. Yu., Alekseev A. P. Kakoi postkapitalizm nuzhen Rossii? // Voprosy filosofii. 2014. № 10. S. 14-24.
3. Bibikov G. N. Terminologicheskaya bor'ba za kul'turu: sovremennye podkhody k izucheniyu kul'turnykh protsessov // Observatoriya kul'tury. 2011. № 1. S. 15-20.
4. Betil'merzaeva M. M. Ontologicheskie i sotsiokul'turnye osnovaniya kul'tury // European Social Science Journal. 2014. № 5 (44). Tom 2. S. 37-45.
5. Osin V. N. Obshchepriznannye sotsial'nye tsennosti (svoboda, pravo, prava i svobody, gosudarstvo) i pravovoi mentalitet // Voprosy filosofii. 2012. № 9.
6. Golovko V. N. Naturalizatsiya metafiziki: nauchnyi realizm i dialekticheskii materializm // Voprosy filosofii. 2013. № 8. S. 24-34.
7. Kasavina N. A. Ekzistentsial'nyi opyt kak fenomen kul'tury // Voprosy filosofii. 2014. № 10. S. 46-56.
8. Brinchuk M. M. Kontseptsiya ustoichivogo razvitiya kak metodologicheskaya osnova tsivilizatsionnogo razvitiya // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2014. № 10. S. 15-24.
9. Balatskii E. V. Zakonomernosti i paradoksy sotsial'noi evolyutsii // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2013. № 2. S. 138-150.
10. Epshtein M. N. Konstruktivnyi potentsial gumanitarnykh nauk: mogut li oni izmenyat' to, chto izuchayut? // Filosofskie nauki. 2008. № 12.
11. Rozov N. S. Novaya aktual'nost' filosofii istorii i problema soglasovaniya opisanii proshlogo // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2014. № 2.
12. Alekseeva I. Yu. Nauchnaya filosofiya kak «kul'turnaya sistema» (O Vladimire Nikolaeviche Ivanovskom i ego ideyakh) // Voprosy filosofii. 2012. № 11.
13. Kutyrev V. A. Ekologicheskii krizis, postmodernizm i kul'tura // Voprosy filosofii. 1996. № 11. S. 23-31.
14. Akhiezer A. S. Ob osobennostyakh sovremennogo filosofstvovaniya (vzglyad iz Rossii) // Voprosy filosofii. 1998. № 2. S. 3-17.
15. Gudkov L. D. Sotsiologiya kul'tury: nauchno-analiticheskii obzor tematicheskogo nomera «Kel'nskogo zhurnala po sotsiologii i sotsial'noi psikhologii» // Kul'turologiya: Daidzhest / RAN. INION. M., 2012. № 1 (60). S. 40-115.
16. Shipovalova L.V. Ob''ektivnost' kak nauchnaya tsennost'. Ili o vozmozhnosti nauki kak elementa kul'tury. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2014. - 1. - C. 12 - 19. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.1.10401.
17. K.M. Dolgov Kul'tura v epokhu globalizatsii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2011. - 9. - C. 38 - 43.
18. P.S. Gurevich Globalizatsiya i mul'tikul'turalizm // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2012. - 8. - C. 4 - 5.
19. V. V. Vanslov Kul'tura i iskusstvo v sovremennom mire // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 3. - C. 99 - 103.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.