Русь и византийское право: несостоявшаяся псевдоморфоза?

Королев Сергей Алексеевич

doi:10.7256/2454-0757.2015.7.14901


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture

Reference:

Korolev S.A. Russia and Byzantine Law: Cancelled Pseudomorphosis? // Philosophy and Culture. 2015. № 7. P. 1028-1042. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2015.7.14901 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=14901

Русь и византийское право: несостоявшаяся псевдоморфоза?

Korolev Sergei Alekseevich

Doctor of Philosophy

Leading research assistant at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences

119991, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Volkhonka, 14/1, str. 5, of. 428

s_a_korolev@list.ru

Other publications by this author

Article was published in rubric "Philosophy of history"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2015.7.14901

Received:

03-04-2015

Published:

05-09-2015

Abstract: The article discusses the process of reception of Byzantine law in Russia as part of the first Russian pseudomorphosis. Considerable attention is paid to the attempt of legal reforms undertaken by Prince Vladimir Svyatoslavich shortly after the beginning of the Christianization of Russia. In particular, the replacement of the traditional vira (fine) as a punishment for murder and "razboynichestvo" with the death penalty is the subject of analysis. The comparison of the two components of the first Russian pseudomorphosis: religious (Christianization) and legal (transformation of laws and practices, the introduction of the ecclesiastical courts, and so on) was carried out. Methodologically, the author relied on traditional methods of analysis, synthesis, systematization as well as the principle of historicism. In his paper Korolev has widely used the conclusions of domestic and foreign philosophers, historians, legal experts and religious scholars resulting from their work on the matter. The author concludes that the legal norms and principles of Byzantium borrowed and adapted in Russia was extremely fragmented. Byzantine law was taking root primarily through the church and the ecclesiastical court. Pseudomorphosis turned out to be a successfully acting, effective mechanism in some areas, especially in religion, and not completely held in others. As a result, the Russian legal system developed not so much by pseudomorphic borrowing but grew out of the old "barbaric" customary law adopting Byzantine rules only partially.

Keywords:

Russia, Rus', blood feud, pseudomorphosis, Christianization, religion, law, reception, court, death penalty, Byzantium

References

1. Shchapov Ya.N. Rimskoe pravo na Rusi do XVI v. (Novye aspekty problemy) // Feodalizm v Rossii. Sb. st., posvyashchennyi pamyati L.V. Cherepnina. M.: Nauka, 1987.
2. Tomsinov V.A. O sushchnosti yavleniya, nazyvaemogo retseptsiei rimskogo prava // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11. Pravo. 1998. № 4.
3. Petrov K.V. K voprosu o retseptsii vizantiiskogo prava v domongol'skoi Rusi // Rus', Rossiya: Srednevekov'e i Novoe vremya. Vyp. 3: Tret'i chteniya pamyati akademika RAN L.V. Milova. Materialy k mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii. M., 2013.
4. Milov L.V. Legenda ili real'nost'? (O neizvestnoi reforme Vladimira i Pravde Yaroslava) // Drevnee pravo. Ivs antiqvvm. 1996. № 1.
5. Milov L.V. O drevnerusskom perevode vizantiiskogo kodeksa zakonov VIII veka (Eklogi) // Istoriya SSSR. 1976. № 1.
6. Povest' vremennykh let // Pamyatniki literatury Drevnei Rusi. Nachalo russkoi literatury. XI – nachalo XII veka. Vstupit. stat'ya D.S. Likhacheva. Sost. i obshchaya red. D.S. Likhacheva i L.A. Dmitrieva. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1978.
7. Evers I.F.G. Drevneishee russkoe pravo v istoricheskom ego raskrytii. SPb., 1835.
8. Reits A. Opyt istorii rossiiskikh gosudarstvennykh i grazhdanskikh zakonov. M.: V Univ. tip., 1836.
9. Petrukhin V.Ya. Kreshchenie Rusi: ot yazychestva k khristianstvu. M.: AST; Astrel', 2006.
10. Cherepnin L.V. Obshchestvenno-politicheskie otnosheniya v Drevnei Rusi i Russkaya Pravda // Drevnerusskoe gosudarstvo i ego mezhdunarodnoe znachenie. M.: Nauka, 1965.
11. Ocherk istorii smertnoi kazni v Rossii. Rech', chitannaya na godichnom akte Imperatorskogo Kazanskogo universiteta ordin. prof. N.P. Zagoskinym // Izvestiya i uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta.1892. № 1.
12. Poppe A. Państwo i kościół na Rusi w XI wieku. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1968.
13. Poppe A. Le prince et l'Eglise en Russie de Kiev depuis la fin du Xe siècle jusqu'au début de XIIe siècle // Acta poloniae historica. Wroclaw; Warszawa; Krakow, 1969. T. 20.
14. Solov'ev V.S. Vizantizm i Rossiya // Solov'ev V.S. Soch. v 2-kh tt. T. 2. M.: Pravda, 1989.
15. Froyanov I.Ya. Zagadka kreshcheniya Rusi. M.: Algoritm, 2007.
16. Milov L.V. Velikorusskii pakhar' i osobennosti rossiiskogo istoricheskogo protsessa. M.: ROSPEN, 1998.
17. Veber M. Politika kak prizvanie i professiya // Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: Progress, 1990.
18. Loba V.E., Malakhov S.N. Ugolovnoe pravo Drevnei Rusi XI–XII vv. (po dannym Russkoi Pravdy). Armavir: RIO AGPA, 2011.
19. Pouchenie Vladimira Monomakha // Pamyatniki literatury Drevnei Rusi. Nachalo russkoi literatury. XI – nachalo XII veka. Vstupit. stat'ya D.S. Likhacheva. Sost. i obshchaya red. D.S. Likhacheva i L.A. Dmitrieva. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1978.
20. Averintsev S.S. Vizantiya i Rus': dva tipa dukhovnosti // Averintsev S. Drugoi Rim. Izbrannye stat'i. SPb.: Amfora, 2005.
21. Gurevich A.Ya. Izbrannye trudy. Norvezhskoe obshchestvo. M.: Traditsiya, 2009.
22. Zhivov V.M. Razyskaniya v oblasti istorii i predystorii russkoi kul'tury. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2002.
23. Bibikhin V.V. Vvedenie v filosofiyu prava. M.: Institut filosofii RAN, 2005.
24. Korolev S.A. Khristianizatsiya kak psevdomorfoza // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. № 8.
25. Sergeevich V.I. Lektsii i issledovaniya po drevnei istorii russkogo prava. 4-e izd., dop. i popr. SPb.: Tipografiya M.M. Stasyulevicha, 1910.
26. Benemanskii M.I. Zakon gradskii. Znachenie ego v russkom prave. M.: Pechatnya A. Snegirevoi,1917.
27. Akhiezer A., Klyamkin I., Yakovenko I. Istoriya Rossii: konets ili novoe nachalo? 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2013.
28. Milov L.V. Problemy retseptsii vizantiiskogo prava v Drevnei Rusi // Milov L.V. Issledovaniya po istorii pamyatnikov srednevekovogo prava. M.: ROSSPEN, 2009.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.