Ñòàòüÿ 'Èñòîðèÿ èññëåäîâàíèé ôèëîñîôèè Ìàðñèëèî Ôè÷èíî â XX â. â àíãëî-ñàêñîíñêîì èíòåëëåêòóàëüíîì ìèðå' - æóðíàë 'Ôèëîñîôèÿ è êóëüòóðà' - NotaBene.ru
ïî
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Èñòîðèÿ èññëåäîâàíèé ôèëîñîôèè Ìàðñèëèî Ôè÷èíî â XX â. â àíãëî-ñàêñîíñêîì èíòåëëåêòóàëüíîì ìèðå

Guryanov Il'ya

postgraduate student of the Department of History of Philosophy at National Research University 'Higher School of Economics'

101000, Russia, Moscow, str. Myasnitskaya, 20

ilgur@yandex.ru

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2015.4.14721

Received:

14-03-2015


Published:

29-05-2015


Abstract: Studies in intellectual and cultural history deal with the ideas of the Renaissance Neo-Platonism in a much different way during the late 19th century and 20th century. One of the main figures of these researches is Marsilio Ficino (1433-1499) who is well-known for the historiosophic conception of prisca theologia and also for his translations of all Plato’s and Plotin’s works and writings attributed to Hermes Trismegistus as well as commentaries on them. Interpretations of Ficino’s thought change dramatically the complex epistemological attitudes to the Renaissance. The article focuses on the works devoted to the philosophy of Marsilio Ficino and analyses the immanent theoretical and contextual (social, institutional) background for the emergence of the Renaissance studies in Anglo-Saxon intellectual world in the middle of XX century as a separate and self-consistent field of research. It is shown that the crucial point in this process is the appearance of German immigrant scientists in the Anglo-Saxon intellectual context  and the successful institutionalization of their research projects and programs. Thus the history of humanities manifests itself through continuity and interaction between intellectual influences and social expectations which could not be reduced mechanically to the constellation of the ideas of autonomic disciplines established in the national scientific contexts.


Keywords:

Neo-Platonism, Renaissance, history of knowledge, knowledge transfer, Marsilio Ficino, German emigration, Renaissance studies, history of Ideas, Ernst Cassirer, Paul Oscar Kristeller

References
1. Tikhonov V. V. Rossiiskaya istoricheskaya nauka i indeksy nauchnogo tsitirovaniya // Novyi istoricheskii vestnik. – 2013. – ¹ 36. – S. 89–106.
2. Supplementum Ficinianum / Ed. by P. O. Kristeller. – Firenze, 1937. – 2 Vol.
3. Kudryavtsev O. F. Florentiiskaya Platonovskaya Akademiya. Ocherk istorii dukhovnoi zhizni renessansnoi Italii. M., 2008. 479 s.;
4. Ivanova Yu. V. Vozrozhdenie filosofii: Marsilio Fichino // Istoriya literatury Italii. T. 2, kn. 1. / Otv. red. M. L. Andreev. – M.: IMLI RAN, 2007. – 720 s.
5. Hankins J. Plato in the Italian Renaissance. Vol. 1. – Leiden; N.Y. etc., 1990. – 847 p.
6. Ficino M. Three books on life: A Critical Edition and Translation with Introduction and Notes / Ed. by Carol V. Kaske, John R. Clark. – Tempe ; N.Y. : University Press, 1988. – 524 p.
7. Katinis T. A humanist confronts the plague: Ficino’s Consilio contra la pestilentia // Modern Language Note. – 2010. – Vol. 125, ¹ 1. – P. 72–83.
8. Secrets of Nature: Astrology and Alchemy in Early Modern Europe / Ed. by William R. Newman, Anthony Grafton. – Cambridge; London, 2001. – 443 p.
9. Katinis T. Medicina e filosofia in Marsilio Ficino: il Consilio contro la pestilenza. – Roma, 2007. – 236 p.
10. Grendler P. The Universities of Italian Renaissance. – L. ; Baltimore, 2004. – 598 p.
11. Writing national histories: Western Europe since 1800 / Ed. by Stefan Berger, Mark Donovan, Kevin Passmore. – London; N. Y., 1999. – 331 p.
12. De Filippis M. The Renaissance Problem Again // Italica. – 1943. – Vol. 20, ¹. 2. – P. 65–80.
13. Burkkhardt Ya. Kul'tura Vozrozhdeniya v Italii / Per. s nem. yaz. N. N. Balashova, I. I. Makhan'kova. – M., 1996. – 591 s.
14. Sigurdson R. F. Jacob Burckhardt: The Cultural Historian as Political Thinker // The Review of Politics. – 1990. – Vol. 52, ¹ 3. – P. 417–440.
15. Della Torre A. Storia dell’academia platonica di Firenze. – Firenze, 1902. – 860 p.
16. Kassirer E. Izbrannoe: Individ i kosmos / Per. s nem. yaz. A. G. Gadzhikurbanova i dr. – M.; SPb, 2000. – 656 c.
17. Cassirer E. Ficino’s Place in Intellectual History // Journal of the History of Ideas. – 1945. – Vol. 6. – P. 483–501.;
18. Cassirer E. Giovanni Pico della Mirandola. A Study in the History of Renaissance Ideas // in Journal of the History of Ideas. – 1942. – Vol. 3. – P. 123–144, 319–346.
19. Edelhait A. Ficino, Pico, and Savonarola: the evolution of humanist theology 1461/2-1498. – Boston; Leiden, 2008. – 510 p..
20. Rezvykh P. V. Diskussii o mifologii v romanticheskoi Altertumswissenschaft / Preprinty. Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki. Seriya WP6 «Gumanitarnye issledovaniya». – M., 2012. – 44 s.
21. Rudolph E. Ernst Cassirer im Kontext: Kulturphilosophie zwischen Metaphysik und Historismus. – Tübingen, 2003. – 277 p.
22. Petersohn J. Deutschsprachige Mediävistik in der Emigration. Wirkungen und Folgen des Aderlasses der NS-Zeit (Geschichtswissenschaft-Rechtsgeschichte – Humanismusforschung) // Historische Zeitschrift. – 2003. – Bd. 277, H. 1. – P. 1–60.
23. Landauer C. Erwin Panofsky and the Renascence of the Renaissance // Renaissance Quarterly. – 1994. – Vol. 47, ¹ 2. – P. 255–281.
24. Falco R. Marsilio Ficino and Vatic Myth // Modern Language Notes. Italian Issue. – 2007. – Vol. 122, ¹ 1. – P. 101–122.
25. Bredekamp H. Götterdӓmmerung des Neuplatonismus // Kritische Berichte. – 1986. – Vol. 14, ¹ 4. – P. 39–48.
26. Zorach R. Love, Truth, Orthodoxy, Reticence; or, What Edgar Wind Didn’t See in Botticelli’s Primavera // Critical Inquiry. – 2007. – Vol. 34, ¹ 1. – P. 190–224.
27. Kuntz M. L., Kuntz P. G. Truth in history: Waswo’s ideological relativism vs Kristeller’s empirical objectivism // Bibliothèque d'Humanisme et Renaissance. – 1982. – T. 44, ¹. 3. – P. 645-648.
28. Blum P.R. The Young Paul Oskar Kristeller as a Philosopher // Kristeller Reconsidered. Essays on his Life and Scholarship / Ed. by John Monfasani. – N.Y., 2006. – P. 19–36.
29. Monfasani J. Toward the Genesis of the Kristeller Thesis of Renaissance Humanism: Four Bibliographical Notes // Renaissance Quarterly. – 2000. Vol, 53, ¹ 4. – P. 1156 – 1173.
30. Cassirer E., Kristeller P. O., Randall J. N. Jr. The Renaissance Philosophy of Man. –Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1948. – 405 p.
31. Allen J. B. M. Paul Oskar Kristeller and Marsilio Ficino: e tenebris revocaverunt // Kristeller Reconsidered. Essays on his Life and Scholarship / Ed. by John Monfasani. – N.Y., 2006. P. 1–18.
32. RSA Presidents, 1954 to Present [Elektronnyi resurs] / The Renaissance Society of America. Elektron. dan. [N. Y., b.d.]. URL: http://www.rsa.org/?page=Presidents , svobodnyi (data obrashcheniya 15.03.2014)
33. Panofski E. Etyudy po ikonologii. Gumanisticheskie temy v iskusstve Vozrozhdeniya / Per. s angl. N. G. Lebedevoi, N. A. Osminskoi. – SPb., 2009. – 432 s.
34. Panofski E. Idea / Per s nem. yaz. Yu. N. Popovoi. – SPb., 1999. – 228 s.
35. Wind E. The Eloquence of Symbols: Studies in Humanist Art. – Oxford, 1983. – 286 p.
36. Saxl F. A Marsilio Ficino Manuscript Written in Bruges in 1475, and the Alum Monopoly of the Popes // Journal of the Warburg Institute. – 1937. – Vol. 1, ¹ 1. – P. 61–62.
37. Klibansky R., Panofsky E., Saxl F. Saturn and Melancholy. Studies in the history of natural philosophy, religion and art. – Nendeln (Liechtenstein), 1979. – 536 p.
38. Hanssen B. Portrait of Melancholy (Benjamin, Warburg, Panofsky) // Modern Language Notes. – 1999. Vol. 114, ¹ 5. – P. 991–1013.
39. Magun A. K istokam mrachnykh chuvstv. Negativnaya affektatsiya mezhdu melankholiei i terrorizmom // Neprikosnovennyi zapas. – 2013. – ¹ 89. – S. 195–208.
40. Walker D. P. Spiritual and Demonic Magic: From Ficino to Campanella. – Pennsylvania, 2000. – 244 p.
41. Ieits F. A. Dzhordano Bruno i germeticheskaya traditsiya / Per. s angl. yaz. G. Dashevskogo. – M., 2000. – 528 s.
42. Platonism after Plato in the Renaissance [Elektronnyi resurs] / The Warburg Institute, University of London, School of Advanced Study. [London, 2014]. URL: http://warburg.sas.ac.uk/events/colloquia-2013-14/platonism-after-plato/ , svobodnyi (data obrashcheniya 17.03.2014)
43. Snyder J. G. Matter and Method in Marsilio Ficino's "Platonic Theology". PhD thesis. –N. Y., 2008. – 216 p.
44. The Letters of Marsilio Ficino / Tr. Language Dept. of School of Economic Science. – L.: Shepheard-Walwyn, 1975–2012. – 9 Vol.
45. Kaske C. The Letters of Marsilio Ficino by Marsilio Ficino [Recensio] // Renaissance Quarterly. 2006. Vol. 59. ¹ 3. P. 828–831.
46. Life with Marsilio Ficino Workshop [Elektronnyi resurs] / Midlands School of Practical Philosophy. [Birmingham, 2013]. URL: http://www.philosophymidlands.org/life-with-marsilio-ficino-workshop/ svobodnyi (data obrashcheniya 17.05.2014).
47. Ficino M. Commentaries on Plato: Volume 1, Phaedrus and Ion. / Ed. and trans. by Michael J. B. Allen. Cambridge (MA), 2008. 279 p.
48. Marsilio Ficino’s Commentary on Plato’s Symposium // Ed. and trans. by J. Sears Reynolds. Columbia, 1944. 248 p.
49. G. Froidental' Otsutstvuyushchii tsentr filosofii Kassirera:
Homo Faber in abstracto. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2011. - 1. - C. 9 - 24.

50. Parkhomenko R.N. Ideya svobody v epokhu Vozrozhdeniya i Novoe vremya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2014. - 2. - C. 227 - 238. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.2.8107.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.