Статья 'Философский диалог «чистых славянофилов» и В.В. Розанова (некоторые аспекты)' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Философский диалог «чистых славянофилов» и В.В. Розанова (некоторые аспекты)

Skorokhodova Svetlana Igorevna

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor, Department of Philosophy, Moscow State Pedagogical University

119571, Russia, Moscow region, Moscow, Prospekt Vernadskogo str., 88, room 818

moscow.belgrad@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2015.6.14583

Received:

27-02-2015


Published:

28-07-2015


Abstract: The article discusses the attitude of V. V. Rozanov to the classical Slavophilism that today grows important as an essential source of the original Russian philosophical tradition with its focus primarily on the philosophical-historical and anthropological issues. Special attention is paid to Rozanov's critical approach to their heritage as a result of Rozanov's antidogmatic philosophical thinking when Rozanov examines the same phenomenon from different angles. However, despite the criticism, the philosopher acknowledged the deep truth of the main ideas of the representatives of the "Moscow school", who in his opinion represented "the essence of Russia". The author also studies the hidden similarities in the works of Slavophiles and Rozanov, primarily related to the presence of the common key categories ("life", "faith", "love", "creativity", etc), as well as the common themes such as patriotism, family, Russian national character, asceticism and poverty as the main educational tool of the people, the hope for mercy, etc. but not juridism. When analyzing the heritage of Russian philosophers, the author of the article has applied the contextual analysis and personal approach assuming that philosophical theories, concepts, doctrines and ideas cannot be alienated and adequately understood outside the context of spiritual and practical life of their creators. When carrying out the review and analysis of Rozanov's philosophy of history and Slavophiles the researcher has used the dialogical paradigm that involves comparison of their ideas. Based on the analysis of the sources, the author concludes that the work of the representatives of the 'Moscow school' was an organic part of Rozanov's philosophical constructs. It is stated that although there were common categories and terms in the philosophy of Slavophiles and Rozanov's philosophy, those categories and terms were defined differently. The conclusion is that their common intellectual context allowed a continuous dialogue between Rozanov and Slavophiles where the ideas of the representatives of the 'Moscow school' were completed and adopted in accordance with the personal experience of the philosopher and in tune with the Silver Age. 


Keywords:

Russian character, faith, Kireevsky, Homjakov, Rozanov, Silver Age, Slavophiles, 'Moscow school', life, gender

References
1. Rozanovskaya entsiklopediya. M.: ROSSPEN, 2008. S.2102-2114.
2. Rozanov V. V. PSS: V 35 tt. T. 1. O pisatel'stve i pisatelyakh: Legenda o Velikom inkvizitore F.M. Dostoevskogo. Stat'i 1889-1990 gg. SPb: Rostok, 2014.
3. Rozanov V. V. «Novoe vremya». 1911. 12 fevralya. №12544.
4. Pamyati A.S. Khomyakova (1-e maya1804 – 1-e maya 1901 g.) // Novyi put', 1904 №6 S. 1-16.; Rozanov V.V. Sobr. Soch. Okolo tserkovnykh sten. M., 1995. S. 419-428. Pominki po slavyanofil'stve i slavyanofilam// Novoe vremya 1904, 21 maya; Rozanov V.V. sobr. Soch. Legenda o Velikom inkvizitore F.M. Dostoevskogo. M.,1996. S. 447-454. A.S. Khomyakov: K 50-letiyu so dnya konchiny ego (23 sentyabrya 1860 – 23 sentyabrya 1910)// Russkoe slovo 1910, 23 sentyabrya. Podpis' V.Varvarin; Rozanov V.V. sobr. Soch. O pisatelyakh i pisatel'stve. M., 1995. S. 456-466. Khomyakov i litergiya na ispanskom yazyke// Novoe vremya 1912, 30 sentyabrya. Vazhnye trudy o Khomyakove// Novoe vremya 1916, 12 oktyabrya. P.A. Florenskii ob A.S. Khomyakove// Kolokol 1916, 14 i 22 oktyabrya.
5. Kireevskii I.V. Kritika i estetika. M., 1979.
6. Kireevskii I. V. Pis'mo ot 6 iyulya 1833 ili 1834 goda.// Kireevskii I. V., Kireevskii P. V. PSS: V 4 t. T. 3, Kaluga, 2006.
7. Fedyakin S.R. Khudozhestvennaya proza Vasiliya Rozanova. Zhanrovye osobennosti. M., 2014.
8. Losev A.F. Muzyka kak predmet logiki.// Losev A. F. Iz rannikh proizvedenii. M., 1990. S. 253. Sm. takzhe Rozanov V.V. Miniatyury. M., 2004. S. 30-31.
9. Rozanov V.V. Mimoletnoe. Moskva. 1994.
10. Rozanov V. V. «Legenda o Velikom Inkvizitore» F.M. Dostoevskogo i drugie stat'i: 1891-1892. M.: Progress-Pleyada, 2013. M., 1994.
11. Kireevskii I.V. Dnevnik. RGALI F. 236 Op. 1 Ed. khr. 10.
12. Rozanov V.V. Sochineniya v 2-kh tt. M.,1990. T.2.
13. Rozanov V.V. Semeinyi vopros v Rossii. M., 2004.
14. Khomyakov A.S. PSS: v 8-mi tt. 1904. T. 8.
15. Rozanov V. V. Sochineniya v 2 tt. T.1. Religiya i kul'tura. M.: pravda, 1990.
16. Gusev D.A. Mirovozzrencheskaya orientatsiya prepodavatelya sotsial'no-gumanitarnykh distsiplin v obrazovatel'nom protsesse // Obrazovatel'nye resursy i tekhnologii. 2014. № 4 (7). S. 62-69.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.