Статья 'Теория «структуры научных революций» Т.Куна и кризис классической парадигмы в физике на рубеже XIX – XX столетий' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Теория «структуры научных революций» Т.Куна и кризис классической парадигмы в физике на рубеже XIX – XX столетий

Baksanskiy Oleg Evgen'evich

Doctor of Philosophy

D.Sc. in Philosophy, Professor, Leading Researcher at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Institute of Philosophy of RAS)

119991, Russia, Moscow, Volkhonka str., 141, bld. 5, rooom No. 405

obucks@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 
Korzhuev Andrei Vyacheslavovich

Doctor of Pedagogy

professor of the Department of Medical and Biological Physics at I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

119991, Russia, Moscow, Trubetskaya str. 8, bld. 2 I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

akorjuev@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2015.5.13839

Received:

29-11-2014


Published:

19-06-2015


Abstract: The article is devoted to the crisis of physics that happened at the turn of the XIXth and the XXth centuries. The crisis is viewed in terms of the ideas suggested and proved by Thomas Kuhn in his book 'The Structure of Sientific Revolutions'. The main attention is paid to the crisis of Newtonian classical mechanics and the 'birth' of Einstein theory of relativity, the Rutherford–Bohr model of the hydrogen atom and quantum mechanics that logically proceeded therefrom.  In the course of its development natural science has reviewed the main fundamental provisions and paradigms as a result of reconsideration of previously established and adopted by the academic community logical relations such as 'cause and effect', 'reason and phenomenon', 'grounds and theory based thereupon' as well as inspirational, causal and systems determinations. The main research method used by the authors is the method of the reconstruction of cognitive representations of that epoch in terms of the modern concept of the physical picture of the world. The main conclusion is that Thomas Kuhn's theory of scientific revolutions 'highlighted' a number of important methodological peculiarities of the crisis of physics at the turn of centuries and allowed to develop particular methodology based on those peculiarities and sometimes even took a new look at them and compare them to the typical peculiarities of later 'scientific revolutions'. 


Keywords:

classical paradigms in physics, paradigm crisis, scientific revolution, methodological reflexion, scientific paradigm, crisis of natural science, paradigm shifts, scientific world view, scientific picture of the w, physics and natural science, mathematics in natural science

References
1. Kuhn T.S. The function of measurement in modern physical science. Isis, 1961. 212 s.
2. Baksanskii O.E., Korzhuev A.V. "V strukture mirozdan'ya ishchem smysl…": elektron, atom, yadro. Istoriko-filosofskie syuzhety fiziki na rubezhe stoletii. M.: LENAND, 2014. 194 s.
3. Baksanskii O.E., Korzhuev A.V. Krizis klassicheskoi paradigmy v fizike. M.: LENAND, 2014. 200 s.
4. Bor N. Atomnaya fizika i chelovecheskoe poznanie / Perevod s angl. V.A. Foka i A.V. Lermantovoi. M.: Izd-vo inostrannoi literatury, 1961. 186 s.
5. Gurevich P.S. Filosofiya: Uchebnik dlya bakalavrov. M.: Yurait, 2012. 574 s.
6. Danin D. Nil's Bor // Nauka i zhizn'. 1972. №№ 1-9; 1973. №№ 4–9.
7. Dirak P. Lektsii po kvantovoi teorii polya / Perevod s angl. M.: LENAND, 2011. 286 s.
8. Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsii. M.: Mir, 1961. 318 s.
9. Rabotnov A.S. Larchik mozhno ne otkryvat'. Kvantovyi tunnel'nyi effekt. Polveka zagadok i otkrytii. M.: Energoatomizdat, 1983. 212 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.