«Естественность» религии и «естественная религия» в когнитивном религиоведении

Малевич Татьяна Владимировна; Фолиева Татьяна Александровна

doi:10.7256/2454-0757.2014.11.13380


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture

Reference:

Malevich T.V., Folieva T.A. // Philosophy and Culture. 2014. № 11. P. 1605-1617. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2014.11.13380 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=13380

«Естественность» религии и «естественная религия» в когнитивном религиоведении

Malevich Tatiana Vladimirovna

PhD in Philosophy

119991, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast', g. Moscow, ul. Volkhonka, 14/1, str. 5, kab. 409

t.v.malevich@gmail.com

Folieva Tatiana Alexandrovna

PhD in Philosophy

400001, Russia, Volgogradskaya oblast', g. Volgograd, ul. Kim, 6b, aud. 304

t.folieva@gmail.com

Article was published in rubric "Philosophy of religion"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2014.11.13380

Received:

03-12-2014

Published:

17-12-2014

References

1. Anofriev I. S. Ponyatie «kontrintuitivnost'» v kognitivnom religiovedenii // Tochki / Puncta. 2012. №1-4/14. S. 155-158.
2. Kostylev P. N. Religiovedcheskoe issledovanie v epokhu informatsionnykh tekhnologii: na primere kognitivnoi teorii religii // Religioznost' v izmenyayushchemsya mire: sb. materialov I Mezhdunar. zimnei religiovedcheskoi shkoly, Volgograd, 2008. Volgograd: VolGU, 2008. S. 71-78.
3. Lakoff Dzh. Zhenshchiny, ogon' i opasnye veshchi: Chto kategorii yazyka govoryat nam o myshlenii. M.: Gnozis, 2011.
4. Malevich T. V. Kognitivnye determinanty «estestvennoi religii» v kontseptsii Dzhastina Barretta // Chelovek i religiya: materialy mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., Minsk, 2013. Minsk: Chetyre chetverti, 2013. S. 310-315.
5. Malevich T. V. Ponyatie «estestvennaya religiya» v kognitivnom religiovedenii // Vіsnik Kiїvs'kogo natsіonal'nogo unіversitetu іm. Tarasa Shevchenka. Fіlosofіya. Polіtologіya. 2012. № 110. S. 48-49.
6. Markov A. V. Religiya: poleznaya adaptatsiya, pobochnyi produkt evolyutsii ili «virus mozga»? // Istoricheskaya psikhologiya i sotsiologiya istorii. 2009. T. 2/1. S. 45-56.
7. Pyusiainen I. Buddizm, religiya i ponyatie «Bog» // Religiovedcheskie issledovaniya. 2012. №7-8. S. 137-154.
8. Sergienko R. A. Kognitivnoe religiovedenie o kul'turnoi estestvennosti religioznykh form mirovozzreniya // Dukhovnaya sfera zhizni obshchestva: problemy teorii i praktiki: Materialy mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. Stavropol', 2011. S. 493-499.
9. Sergienko R. A. «Problema Mikki Mausa» i «problema Zevsa» v sovremennom kognitivnom religiovedenii // Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2011. №4/48. S. 236-241.
10. Shakhnovich M. Kognitivnaya nauka i issledovaniya religii // Gosudarstvo, religiya i Tserkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2013. №3/31. S. 32-62.
11. Barrett J. L. Cognitive Constraints on Hindu Concepts of the Divine // Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 1998. Vol. 37/4. P. 608-619.
12. Barrett J. L. Cognitive Science of Religion: Looking Back, Looking Forward // Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 2011. Vol. 50/2. P. 229-239.
13. Barrett J. L. Cognitive Science, Religion, and Theology: From Human Minds to Divine Minds. West Conshohocken: Templeton Press, 2011.
14. Barrett J. L. Exploring the Natural Foundations of Religion // Trends in Cognitive Science. 2000. Vol. 4/1. P. 29-34.
15. Barrett J. L. The Naturalness of Religious Concepts: An Emerging Cognitive Science of Religion // New Approaches to the Study of Religion / Ed. by P. Antes et al. Vol. 2. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2004. P. 401-418.
16. Barrett J. L. Theological Correctness: Cognitive Constraint and the Study of Religion // Method & Theory in the Study of Religion. 1999. Vol. 11. P. 325-339.
17. Barrett J. L. Why Santa Claus is Not a God // Journal of Cognition and Culture. 2008. Vol. 8. P. 149-161.
18. Barrett J. L. Why Would Anyone Believe in God? Lanham: Alta Mira Press, 2004.
19. Barrett J. L., Keil F. Conceptualizing a Nonnatural Entity: Anthropomorphism in God Concepts // Cognitive Psychology. 1996. Vol. 31. P. 219-247.
20. Barrett J. L., Johnson A. H. The Role of Control in Attributing Intentional Agency to Inanimate Objects // Journal of Cognition and Culture 2003. Vol. 3/3. P. 208-217.
21. Boyer P. Cognitive Constraints on Cultural Representations: Natural Ontologies and Religious Ideas // Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture / Ed. by L. A. Hirschfeld, S. A. Gelman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. P. 391-411.
22. Boyer P. Evolution of the Modern Mind and the Origins of Culture: Religious Concepts as a Limiting-Case // Evolution and the Human Mind: Modularity, Language and Meta-Cognition / Ed. by P. Carruthers, A. Chamberlain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. P. 93-112.
23. Boyer P. The Naturalness of Religious Ideas: A Cognitive Theory of Religion. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.
24. Boyer P. Religious Ontologies and the Bounds of Sense: A Cognitive Catalogue of the Supernatural [Elektronnyi resurs] // URL: http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/courses01/rrtw/Boyer.htm (data obrashcheniya: 14.07.14)
25. Boyer P. Religious Thought and Behaviour as By-products of Brain Function // Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2003. Vol. 7/3. P. 119-124.
26. Boyer P. What Makes Anthropomorphism Natural: Intuitive Ontology and Cultural Representations // The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 1996. Vol. 2/1. P. 83-97.
27. Boyer P., Ramble C. Cognitive Templates for Religious Concepts: Cross-Cultural Evidence for Recall of Counter-Intuitive Representations // Cognitive Science. 2001. Vol. 25. P. 535-564.
28. Byrne P. Natural Religion and the Nature of Religion: The Legacy of Deism. London: Routledge, 2013.
29. Cohen E., Barrett J. L. Conceptualizing Spirit Possession: Ethnographic and Experimental Evidence // Ethos. 2008. Vol. 26/2. P. 246-267.
30. d’Aquili E. G., Newberg A. B., The Mystical Mind: Probing the Biology of Religious Experience. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1999.
31. Gervais W. M., Henrich J. The Zeus Problem: Why Representational Content Biases Cannot Explain Faith in Gods // Journal of Cognition and Culture. 2010. Vol. 10. P. 383-389.
32. Guthrie S. E. Animal Animism: Evolutionary Roots of Religious Cognition // Current Approaches in the Cognitive Science of Religion / Ed. by I. Pyysiäinen, V. Anttonen. London: Continuum, 2002. P. 38-67.
33. Guthrie S. E. Why Gods? A Cognitive Theory // Religion in Mind: Cognitive Perspectives on Religious Belief, Ritual, and Experience / Ed. by J. Andresen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. P. 94-101.
34. Hirschfeld L. A., Gelman S. A. Toward a Topography of Mind: An Introduction to Domain Specificity // Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture / Ed. by L. A. Hirschfeld, S. A. Gelman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. P. 3-35.
35. Keil F. C. Constraints on Knowledge and Cognitive Development // Psychological Review. 1981. Vol. 88/3. P. 197-227.
36. Keil F. C. Semantic and Conceptual Development: An Ontological Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.
37. Kelemen D. Are Children ‘‘Intuitive Theists’’?: Reasoning About Purpose and Design in Nature // Psychological Science. 2004. Vol. 15/5. P. 295-301.
38. Lawson E. T. Psychological Perspectives on Agency // Religion in Mind: Cognitive Perspectives on Religious Belief, Ritual, and Experience / Ed. by J. Andresen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. P. 141-172.
39. McCauley R. N. Why Religion is Natural and Science is Not. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
40. Porubanova-Norquist M. et al. Minimal-Counterintuitiveness Revisited: Effects of Cultural and Ontological Violations on Concept Memorability // Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion. 2013. Vol. 1/2. P. 181-192.
41. Richert R. A., Barrett J. L. Do You See What I See? Young Children’s Assumptions about God’s Perceptual Abilities // The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. 2005. Vol. 15/4. P. 283-295.
42. Slone D. J. Theological Incorrectness: Why Religious People Believe What They Shouldn’t. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
43. Sperber D. The Modularity of Thought and the Epidemiology of Representations // Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture / Ed. by L.A. Hirschfeld, S.A. Gelman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. P. 39-67.
44. Spilka B. et al. A General Attribution Theory for the Psychology of Religion // Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 1985. Vol. 24. P. 1-20

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.