MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
Nilogov A.S.
Philosophical, Too Philosophical
// Philosophy and Culture.
2015. № 9.
P. 1409-1413.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2015.9.12785 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=12785
Философское, слишком философское
Nilogov Aleksei Sergeevich
PhD in Philosophy
Current Member (Academician), Moscow Academy of Philosophy of Economy; Chairman of South-Siberian Historical-Genealogical Society (Abakan), Member of Russian Genealogical Federation, Head of Laboratory of Genealogical Research, Khakass Scientific Research Institute of Language, Literature and History
655017, Russia, respublika Khakasiya, g. Abakan, ul. Shchetinkina, 23, kab. 23
|
nilogov1981@yandex.ru
|
|
|
Other publications by this author |
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2015.9.12785
Received:
05-08-2014
Published:
1-4.32-2015
Abstract:
In his review of the book 'Unknown God of Philosophy' written by the doctor of philosophy, professor Vladimir Varava, Nilogov brings out the eternal issue regarding 'the purpose' of philosophy. This is the issue that has been existing ever since philosophy was created as a science. In his book Varava manages to relate the fact of existence (ontological argument) to the searches for the human dimension of philosophy (anthropological argument), thus putting today's philosophical anthropology to the methodological 'deadlock' regarding whether human future is possible without human-dimensioned philosophy, and whether future of philosophy is possible without philosophy-dimensioned beings. The author of the review article applies the problem method, historical-philosophical method, methods of analysis and synthesis and dialectical approach to discovering contradictions. Vladimir Varava's thesis that philosophy has to sacrifice the truth for the sake of finding human features in human, thus rejecting the essential definitions of both human and philosophy itself, needs to be critisized. This raises a question regarding what type of philosophy is suggested, anthropological ('human-dimensioned') philosophy (when human talks about philosophy), philosophical anthropology (when philosophy talks about human) or philosophy-dimensioned philosophy (when philosophy talks about philosophy).
References
1. Bogatov M. A. Manifest ontologii. M., 2007.
2. Bekon F. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T. 1. M., 1977.
3. Varava V. V. Nevedomyi Bog filosofii. M., 2013.
4. Debor G. Obshchestvo spektaklya. M., 2011.
5. Il'enkov E. V. Filosofiya i kul'tura. M., 1991.
6. Nilogov A. S. Filosofiya antiyazyka. SPb., 2013.
7. Nitsshe F. Tak govoril Zaratustra. Sumerki idolov, ili Kak filosofstvuyut molotom. M., 2006.
8. E. M. Spirova Filosofskaya antropologiya kak sistema ponyatii. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2010.-11.-C. 128-137.
9. Gurevich P. S. Postizhenie cheloveka cherez artefakty kul'tury // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2014.-6.-C. 916-918. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.6.12263.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|