Деконструкция в постмодернистских текстах литературы и искусства

Литвинцева Галина Юрьевна

doi:10.7256/2454-0757.2015.4.12676


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture

Reference:

Litvintseva G. Deconstruction in Post-Modernistic Texts of Literature and Art // Philosophy and Culture. 2015. № 4. P. 582-592. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2015.4.12676 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=12676

Деконструкция в постмодернистских текстах литературы и искусства

Litvintseva Galina

PhD in Pedagogy

associate professor of the Department of Social and Cultural Activity at Saint Petersburg State University of Culture and Arts

191186, Russia, Saint Petersburg, str. Dvortsovaya Naberezhnaya, 2-4

galinalitvinceva@yandex.ru

Other publications by this author

Article was published in rubric "Philosophy of postmodernism"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2015.4.12676

Received:

18-07-2014

Published:

29-05-2015

Abstract: The present article is devoted to deconstruction as the leading category of post-modernism as well as the method of composing post-modernistic literary and art texts aimed at critisizing traditional analytical thinking, decentration of different kinds of centralisms, removal of binary oppositions and search for conceptual multiplicity. Moreover, the author of the article describes such features of post-modernistic texts as intertextuality, nonclassical interpretation of past traditions in the ironic, playful or parodical form. The author also tries to define the general and specific features of deconstruction in foreign and Russian literary and art texts. Based on the analysis of philosophical, cultural, literary and art researches, the author describes the features of deconstruction. The author has used the comparative method to analyze foreign and Russian post-modernistic texts of literature and art. The author concludes that while American and Western European post-modernists perform the deconstruction of the ideology of the consumer society, Russian post-modernists deconstruct the consumption of products of the Soviet ideology. Americans and Western European post-modernists use deconstruction in order to create a free player space, to make the most important issues of human existence to be the aim of the play, and to view traditions from the point of view of the democratic pluralism, while Russian post-modernists deconstuct such 'national metanarratives' as 'ideologism', 'totalitarianism', 'utopism' and 'literature-centrism'. These allow to understand our traditional 'eternal' issues using nontraditional means such as obscene words and shocking naturalistic and physiological descriptions. The author's conclusion that deconstruction acts as a mean of creating a new language capable of describing framentary, orderless, unstable and hyperreal post-modern world is crucial for understanding and adequate perception of post-modernistic texts.

Keywords:

decentration, intertextuality, multiple meaning, irony, parody, play, absurdity, metanarrative, hyperreality, simulacrum

References

1. Bart R. Smert' avtora // Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika.-M.,1994. – S.384-391.
2. Berg M. Literaturokratiya. Problema prisvoeniya i pereosmysleniya vlasti v literature.-M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2000. – 352 s.
3. Bodriiyar Zh.Amerika.-SPb.,2000. – 123 s.
4. Bodriiyar Zh.Obshchestvo potrebleniya. Ego mify i struktura.-M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya; Respublika,2006. – 272 s.
5. Grois B.Vechnoe vozvrashchenie novogo//Iskusstvo, 1989, №10. – S.1-2.
6. Delez Zh.Logika smysla.-M.: Akademiya /Ekaterinburg: IPP Ural. Rabochii, 1995. – 474 s.
7. Derrida Zh. Pis'mo yaponskomu drugu// Voprosy filosofii, 1992, №4. – S.53-57.
8. Derrida Zh. Interv'yu s Zhakom Derrida// Arbor Mundi / Mirovoe derevo. 1992. Vyp.1. – S.73-80.
9. Dianova V.M. Postmodernistskaya filosofiya iskusstva: istoki i sovremennost'.-SPb.: Petropolis, 1999. – 240 s.
10. Dolinin A. Palomnichestvo Charl'za Smitsona // Faulz. Dzh. Podruga frantsuzskogo leitenanta. — L.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1985. – S.13-18.
11. Il'in I.P. Dekonstruktivizm// Sovremennoe zarubezhnoe literaturovedenie. Kontseptsii. Shkoly. Terminy: Entsiklopedicheskii spravochnik.-M.:Intrada,1996. – S. 118.
12. Il'in I.P. Poststrukturalizm. Dekonstruktivizm. Postmodernizm.-M.: Intrada, 1996. – 255 s.
13. Kerimov T.Kh. Intertekstual'nost' // Sovremennyi filosofskii slovar'.-M.; Bishkek; Ekaterinburg: Odissei,1996. – S.228.
14. Kristeva Yu. Bakhtin, slovo, dialog i roman // Dialog. Karnaval. Khronotop,1993, №4. – S.5-24.
15. Kuritsyn V. K situatsii postmodernizma // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 1994, N 11. – S.197-223.
16. Lipovetskii M.N. Russkii postmodernizm. Ocherki istoricheskoi poetiki.-Ekaterinburg,1997. – 317 s.
17. Litvintseva G.Yu. Dekonstruktsiya «natsional'nykh metanarrativov» v rossiiskom postmodernizme// Kontsept.-2014.-Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya. Vypusk 2. – ART 54636.-URL: http://e-koncept.ru/2014/54636.htm.
18. Man'kovskaya N.B. «Parizh so zmeyami» (Vvedenie v estetiku postmodernizma). – M.: IFRAN, 1995. – 220 s.
19. Podoroga V. Kairos, kriticheskii moment. Aktual'noe proizvedenie iskusstva na marshe. M.: Grundrisse, 2013. – 180 s.
20. Ryklin M.K. Mishel' Fuko: myslitel' literaturoi// Esteticheskii logos.-M., 1990. – S. 94-102.
21. Skoropanova I.S. Russkaya postmodernistskaya literatura. M.: izd-vo «Flinta», «Nauka», 2004. – 608 s.
22. Sokolov B. Moya kniga o Vladimire Sorokine.-M.: AIRO, 2005. – 224 s.
23. Khabermas Yu. Filosofskii diskurs o moderne.-M.: izd-vo «Ves' mir», 2003. – 416 s.
24. Khart K. Postmodernizm. – M.: Grand – Fair, 2006. – 272 s.
25. Eko U. Otkrytost' proizvedeniya iskusstva//Nekotorye problemy sovremennoi zarubezhnoi estetiki. Sb. perevodov i referatov. V 2-kh ch.-M., 1976. Ch. 2. – S.22-26.
26. Jameson F. Postmodernism or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Duke University Press, 1991.-461 p.
27. Salincscu M. Ways of Looking and fiction // Romanticism, Modernism, Postmodernism, Ed. By Harry R. Garvin. Lewisburgh: Bucknell UP, 1980. – P. 36-49.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.