Культурно-исторический процесс и аккультурация

Сокольская Людмила Викторовна

doi:10.7256/2454-0757.2015.7.11978


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture

Reference:

Sokol'skaya L.V. Culture-Historical Process and Acculturation // Philosophy and Culture. 2015. № 7. P. 986-996. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2015.7.11978 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=11978

Культурно-исторический процесс и аккультурация

Sokol'skaya Lyudmila Viktorovna

PhD in Law

associate professor of the Department of Civil Disciplines at Moscow State Regional Institute for the Humanities

142605, Russia, Orekhovo-Zuyevo, str. Lopatina, 16

law2012@mgogi.ru

Other publications by this author

Article was published in rubric "Connection of times"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2015.7.11978

Received:

07-07-2015

Published:

05-09-2015

Abstract: In her article Sokolskaya studies the role of acculturation as a form of cross-cultural contact in the historical process. Historical process is defined as a progressive process of the development of culture from the lowest to the highest forms. Historical reality confined in particular spatial and time limits is being studied by the researcher as a complex structural integrity determined by the interaction of the variety of cultural phenomena and processes. Providing that the process of the development and functioning of culture of any community is the interaction of cultural achievements with cultural elements of other nations than acculturation is the trigger of cultural sustainability and self-development. In her research Sokolskaya has applied general and specific scientific methods such as analysis and synthesis, comparative, structure-functional, historical, systems and synergetic methods. According to the researcher, the cross-cultural communication of different societies and communities is in fact unlimited. It can unfold as a neverending development and creation of new meanings in the mind of everyone who gets in contact with a representative of this or that cultural community. Based on the results of the research, the author of the article concludes that acculturation is a durable cross-cultural interaction of different societies when cultural systems take each other's features, become somewhat 'alike' and create a new integrity with absolutely new features.

Keywords:

culture-historical process, cross-cultural contacts, acculturation, cultural interaction, assimilation, separation, marginalization, integration, culture, culture of a community

References

1. Acculturation in seven American Indian tribes, ed. R. Linton, N. Y.–L., 1940.
2. Acculturation: An exploratory formulation. N.Y., 1954
3. Beals R.L. Aboriginal Survivals in Mayo Culture // American Anthropolo-gist. V. XXXIV, 1932, p. 28-39.
4. Boas F. The Methods of Ethnology // American Anthropologist. 1920. N.S. Vol. 22, P. 311-322,
5. Foster G.M. Culture and Conquest. America's Spanish Heritage. NY., 1960.
6. Herskovits M.J. African Gods and Catholic Saints in New World Negro Be-lief // American Anthropologist. New Series. Menasha, 1937. Vol. 39. № 4.
7. Kroeber A.L. Anthropology: Race, Language, Culture, Psychology, Prehis-tory. N.Y.; Burlingame, 1948.
8. Mannoni O. Prospero and Coliban. The Psychology of Colonisation. New York, 1950.
9. Parsons E.S. Some Aztec and Pueblo Parallels // American Anthropologist. V. XXXV, 1933, p. 611-631.
10. Redfild R., Linton R., Herskovits M., Memorandum for the study of accul-turation // American Anthropologist. 1936, Vol. 38. №1.
11. Rudolf W. Der kulturelle Relativismus: Kritische Analyse einer Grund-satzfragen-Diskussion in der amerikanischen Ethnologie. – Berlin, 1968.
12. Stonequist E. The Marginal Man: A study in personality and conflict. N.Y., 1937.
13. Thurnwald R. The Psychology of Acculturation // American Anthropologist. 1932. V. XXXIV. P. 557–569.
14. Arutyunov S.A. Bilingvizm i bikul'turalizm // Sovetskaya etnografiya. – 1978.-№ 2.
15. Berdyaev N.A. Smysl istorii. Opyt filosofii chelovecheskoi sud'by. Parizh, 1969. Rezhim dostupa http://www.odinblago.ru/smisl_istorii
16. Beri D.V. Akkul'turatsiya i psikhologicheskaya adaptatsiya: obzor proble-my / per. s angl. – M., 2004.
17. Bibler V.S. Ot naukoucheniya – k logike kul'tury: Dva filosofskikh vvedeniya v KhKhI vek. – M., 1990.
18. Vakhta V.M. Problema akkul'turatsii v sovremennoi etnograficheskoi literature SShA / Sovremennaya amerikanskaya etnografiya: Teoreticheskie napravleniya i tendentsii. – M., 1963.
19. Danilevskii N.Ya. Rossiya i Evropa. – M., 1991.
20. Dokuchaev I.I. Setevaya kul'tura kak istoricheskii tip // Uchenye za-piski. – K-na-A.: GTU. – 2012.-№ 4.
21. D'yakonov I.M. Puti istorii. Ot drevneishego cheloveka do nashikh dnei. – M., 2007.
22. Ikonnikova S.N. Istoriya kul'turologii: Idei i sud'by. – SPb, 1993.
23. Klein L.S. Personalizm: Kul'tura i lichnost' // Razvitie lichnosti. – 2005.-№2.
24. Malikov A.V Problemy tipologii gosudarstva: avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. – M., 1998.
25. Markov G.E. Razvitie sovremennoi germanskoi burzhuaznoi etnologii // Etnografiya za rubezhom (istoriograficheskie ocherki). – M., 1979.
26. Safiullina M.I. Sinergeticheskii podkhod k izucheniyu kul'turnykh kontaktov v etnogeneze // Metodologiya gumanitarnogo znaniya v perspektive XXI veka: materialy mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (18 maya 2001 g. Sankt-Peterburg) k 80-letiyu prof. M.S. Kagana. Ser.: «Symposium». – SPb., 2001. – Vyp. 12.
27. Sobolev V.G. Musul'manskie obshchiny v gosudarstvakh Evropeiskogo soyuza: Problemy i perspektivy.– SPb., 2003.
28. Sokol'skaya L.V.Retseptsiya kak istoricheskaya forma pravovoi akkul'turatsii // Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava.-2014.-1.-C. 47-56.
29. Sukharev M.V. Dvizhenie tsivilizatsii: Rossiya i Zapad // Politicheskie issledovaniya. –2005.-№ 1.
30. Toinbi A.Dzh. Tsivilizatsiya pered sudom istorii. – M., 1996.
31. Tokarev S.A. Istoriya zarubezhnoi etnografii. – M., 1978.
32. Ushanova I.A. Perspektivy razvitiya teorii akkul'turatsii v globali-zovannom mire // Vestnik Novgorodskogo universiteta. – 2003.-№ 4. – S. 65-70; Petruchak L.A. Pravovaya kul'tura Rossii i mezhkul'turnyi dialog v usloviyakh globalizatsii // Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava. –2011.-№ 4. –
33. Chuchin-Rusov A.E. Konvergentsiya kul'tur. – M., 1997.
34. Chuchin-Rusov A.E. Kul'turno-istoricheskii protsess: formy i soderzhanie // Voprosy filosofii. – 1996.-№ 4.
35. Shpengler O. Zakat Evropy. – M., 1993. – T. 1
36. Yankina N.V. Mezhkul'turnaya tolerantnost' kak komponent mezhkul'turnoi kommunikatsii // Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki – 2006.-№ 1.
37. Yaspers K. Istoki istorii i ee tsel'. Rezhim dostupa: http://gendocs.ru/v1517/karl_yaspers

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.