Статья 'Эволюция: попытка позитивно-онтологической интерпретации' - журнал 'Философия и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Эволюция: попытка позитивно-онтологической интерпретации

Spektor David Mikhailovich

PhD in Architecture

Docent, the department of Architecture, Moscow State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering

109451 Russia, Moscow, 3-ya Kabelnaya 1

daspektor@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2015.3.10927

Received:

07-03-2015


Published:

06-05-2015


Abstract: The drivers of human evolution are still one of the darkest points in the anthropogenesis theory. From the point of view of the representatives of positive science, human is a part of nature and therefore unconditionally obeys the laws of nature. The obvious axiom of philosophy is that human has a single essence. In his article Spektor raises the following question: what are the reasons why human has such an essence? Therefore, the research subject of the present article is a theoretical justification of the reasons of the unity of humankind. Noteworthy that such reasons can be found in actual conditions of the descent of man. The research methodology involves monism as the most general principle as well as methods of dialectical logic combined with the analysis or critics of references. The author shows that a sucessive scientific interpretation of the question about the unity of the mankind brings us to the following conclusion: human has to adjust to a very singular environment. This is the kind of environment that has a high level of the internal coherence so all the living creatures have to mutually adjust to one another. So human evolution is a type of specific universalization and constant competition inside their environmental niche. These are the external drivers of 'hominization'. The internal drivers include the initiation of the defensive insinct that have been going on for thousands of years. 


Keywords:

anthropogenesis, evolution, mankind unity, adaptation, homo sapiens sapiens, evolutionism, initiation, cult, sacrifice, culture

References
1. Alekseev V. P. Stanovlenie chelovechestva. – Moskva., 1984.
2. Anikovich M. V., Anisyutkin N. K., Vishnyatskii L. B. Uzlovye problemy perekhoda k verkhnemu paleolitu v Evrazii. – SPb., 2007.
3. Borodai Yu. M. Ot fantazii k real'nosti. M., 1995. S. 205.
4. Golovnev A. V. Antropologiya dvizheniya (drevnosti severnoi Evrazii). Ekaterinburg, 2009.
5. Darvin Ch. Sochineniya. M., 1953. T. V.
6. Istoriya pervobytnogo obshchestva. Obshchie voprosy. Problemy antroposotsiogeneza. M., Nauka, 1983.
7. Lorents K. Oborotnaya storona zerkala. – M., 1988.
8. Malinovskii B. Magiya, nauka i religiya. M., 1993.
9. Markov A. Evolyutsiya cheloveka. Kn. 1. Obez'yany, kosti i geny. – M., 2011.
10. Moos M. Sotsial'nye funktsii svyashchennogo. – Sankt-Peterburg, 2000.
11. Nazaretyan A. P.. «Tsivilizatsionnye krizisy v kontekste universal'noi istorii».– M., 2004.
12. Palmer D., Palmer L. Evolyutsionnaya psikhologiya. Sekrety povedeniya Homo sapiens.
13. Propp V. Ya. Istoricheskie korni volshebnoi skazki. – Leningrad, 1986.
14. Rapoport A. Mir — sozrevshaya ideya. Darmshtadt: «Darmshtadt Bletter», 1993. S. 88.
15. Reznikova Zh. I. 2009. Kognitivnoe povedenie zhivotnykh, ego adaptatsionnaya funktsiya i zakonomernosti formirovaniya. – // Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Psikhologiya. T.3.• Vyp. 2. http://www.reznikova.net/Psyo9.pdf
16. Rouz F. Aborigeny Avstralii. Traditsionnoe obshchestvo. – M., 1989, S.71.
17. Semenov Yu. I. Kak vozniklo chelovechestvo. – Moskva, 1966.
18. Tokarev S. A. Rannie formy religii. – M. 1990.
19. Blaisdell A . R., Sawa K., Leising K. J . , Waldmann M. R . 2006. Causal Reasoning in Rats // Science. V. 311.
20. Christoph Wulf. Anthropologie. Geschichte. Kultur. Philosophie. – Hamburg., 2004. „Die Hominisation ist das Ergebnis des Zusammenwirkens einer Reihe von Faktoren, in denen sich natürliche und kulturelle Elemente überlagern und sich so eng miteinander verschränken, dass eine neue, für den Menschen charakteristische Komplexität entsteht“, zu der folgende Faktoren beitragen: Gehirn, Hände und Werkzeuge, Nahrung und Lebensraum, Feuer und Jagd, Sprache und Kultur“.
21. Franz M. Evolution. Die Entwicklung des Lebens. – München., 2002.
22. Lovejoy S. O. 2009. Reexamining Numan Origins in Light of Ardipithecus ramidus // Science. V. 326.
23. Serge Moscovici, La societe contre nature; UGE 10/18, Paris., 1972. Moskovichi, v chastnosti, dokazyvaet, chto «okhotnik stanovitsya chelovekom, no ne chelovek – okhotnikom»,
24. Zuckerman S. The Social Life of Monkeys and Apes. L., 1932.
25. Belyaev V.A. K idee interkul'tury // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-5.-C. 309-346. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_443.html
26. Belyaev V.A. Krizis interkul'tury i kul'turnye remissii // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-7.-C. 580-617. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_557.html
27. Koshman L.V. Kul'turnoe prostranstvo russkogo goroda XIX – nachala XX vv. K voprosu o kreativnosti istoricheskoi pamyati. // NB: Kul'tury i iskusstva.-2013.-2.-C. 42-115. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_639.html
28. Kanasz T.. Rol' nadezhdy i optimizma v sovremennoi kul'ture // NB: Kul'tury i iskusstva.-2013.-5.-C. 47-69. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_10114.html
29. Shchuplenkov O.V., Shchuplenkov N.O. Natsional'no-kul'turnaya identichnost' v kontekste filosofskoi traditsii dialoga kul'tur // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-10.-C. 183-244. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_8848.html .
30. V.V. Kornil'ev. Ot besporyadka k kollektivnomu bessoznatel'nomu. // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2013.-№ 4.-C. 360-370. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.04.7.
31. I.K. Asadullaev. Totem the Donkey. A hypothesis About Unification of Aryan Clans and Tribes is Confirmed?. // SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.-2013.-№ 2.-C. 102-113. DOI: 10.7256/1339-3057.2013.2.9433.
32. Gurevich, P. S.. The phenomenon of spirit in philosophical understanding of man. // SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.-2013.-№ 1.-C. 4-842. DOI: 10.7256/1339-3057.2013.1.8932.
33. Spirova, E.M.. Why do we need history?. // SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.-2013.-№ 1.-C. 23-27. DOI: 10.7256/1339-3057.2013.1.9019.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.