Семейная аксиосфера: к проблеме инвентаризации базовых ценностей  (на материале записей живой разговорной речи)

Вепрева Ирина Трофимовна; Пикулева Юлия Борисовна

doi:10.25136/2409-8698.2020.12.34705


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Litera

Reference:

Vepreva I., Pikuleva Y. — Family axiosphere: to the problem of inventory of basic values (on the material of recording of conversational speech) // Litera. – 2020. – № 12. – P. 118 - 130. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8698.2020.12.34705 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=34705

Family axiosphere: to the problem of inventory of basic values (on the material of recording of conversational speech)

Vepreva Irina

Doctor of Philology

Professor, the department of Russian Language, General Linguistics and Verbal Communication, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin

620000, Russia, Cverdlovskaya oblast', g. Ekaterinburg, ul. Lenina, 51, of. k. 312

irina_vepreva@mail.ru

Pikuleva Yuliya

PhD in Philology

Docent, the department of Russian Language, General Linguistics and Verbal Communication, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin

620000, Russia, Sverdlovskaya oblast', g. Ekaterinburg, ul. Lenina, 51, of. k.312

pik@bk.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8698.2020.12.34705

Review date:

17-12-2020

Publish date:

24-12-2020

Abstract.

The goal of this work consists on determination of specificity of axiological content of the speech commonly used in a modern family. The dialogical material of Ural citizens united by the commonality of family relations was accumulated; the audio recordings were translated into written form (700,000 characters). The author developed a heuristic procedure for linguo-axiological analysis of conversational speech based on the content of family communication. The two types of speech communication depending on the vector speech behavior towards the content of conversation (content plan) or the addressee (communication plan). The value-thematic and value-communicative fragments of the dialogue are determined respectively. Fragmentation of dialogues on the value basis provides the researcher with the set of compact structural units of analysis appropriate for identification of value meanings of dialogue of the respondents. The author highlights direct and implicit linguistic cues of verbalization of value representations of linguistic identity; acquires the typology of verbal explication of basic values, systematization of axiological representations within the family. The first block of values is determined based on the analysis of value-thematic fragments. It includes universal values, as well as the groups of values related to family relationships, household, and values that receive public recognition. The second block of values is determines based on the analysis of communication-value fragments. It includes groups of values associated with general communication values and values of family interactions.
Keywords: explicit evaluation, verbalization of perceptions of values, verbal behaviour, axiological text fragment, family axiosphere, everyday family communication, speech act, colloquial dialogue, implicit evaluation, лингвоаксиологический анализ
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Bortnikov V. I. Samoprinizhenie v semeinom obshchenii: aksiologema ili stereotip? // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2019. № 10. S. 35–43.
2.	Vepreva I. T. Innovatsionnye metody issledovaniya aksiologicheskogo soderzhaniya rechevogo byta sem'i // Cross – Cultural Studies: Education and Science (CCS&ES), 2018. № 3. 107-113.
3.	Vepreva I. T. Osobennosti zhenskoi aksiosfery: opyt analiza semeinogo obshcheniya // Tez. Chetvertoi mezhdunar. konf. «Gender: yazyk, kul'tura, kommunikatsiya». Moskva, MMA, 28–29 noyabrya 2019 g.. M. : Moskovskaya mezhdunarodnaya akademiya, 2019. S. 60–61.
4.	Vepreva I. T. Dialog vzroslogo s rebenkom: podshuchivanie kak raznovidnost' paternalistskogo stilya obshcheniya // Ural'skii filologicheskii vestnik №2 (29) 2020. Seriya «Yazyk. Sistema. Lichnost': Lingvistika kreativa». Vyp. 29 : Mat-ly Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. «Lingvistika kreativa: tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya novogo nauchnogo napravleniya». (Ekaterinburg, Rossiya, 23-25 aprelya 2020). Ekaterinburg, 2020. S.87–97.
5.	Vepreva I. T. Ubezhdenie, ugovory, ugrozy v semeinom obshchenii, ili kak materi ugovarivayut rebenka poest' // Aksiologicheskie aspekty sovremennykh filologicheskikh issledovanii : Tez. dokl. mezhdunar. nauch. seminara (13 maya 2020 g.). Ekaterinburg : Izd. dom «Azhur», 2020. S. 15–18.
6.	Danilov S. Yu. Rechevoi zhanr «sovet» v aksiologicheskom aspekte // Aksiologicheskie aspekty sovremennykh filologicheskikh issledovanii: Tez. dokl. Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (UrFU, 15–17 oktyabrya 2019 g.) / Otv. red. N. A. Kupina. Ekaterinburg : Izdatel'skii dom «Azhur», 2019. S. 240–241.
7.	Danilov S. Yu. Prikazyvayu, proshu, sovetuyu, trebuyu: rechezhanrovye konventsii semeinogo obshcheniya // Aksiologicheskie aspekty sovremennykh filologicheskikh issledovanii : Tez. dokl. mezhdunar. nauch. konf. seminara (13 maya 2020 g.). Ekaterinburg : Izd. dom «Azhur», 2020. S. 22–24.
8.	Dyul'dina Zh. N., Shustova L. P. Kategorii «tsennost'» i «semeinye tsennosti» v filosofskikh, psikhologicheskikh i sotsial'no-pedagogicheskikh naukakh // Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologii, 2016. №11–1. S. 96–99.
9.	Itskovich T. V., Kupina N. A. Vnutrisemeinye dialogi o professii: lingvoaksiologicheskaya interpretatsiya // Vestnik Volgograd. gos. un-ta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie, 2018. № 17 – 4. S. 153–162.
10.	Kapanadze L. A. Semeinyi dialog i semeinye nominatsii // Kapanadze L. A. Golosa i smysly : izbrannye raboty po russkomu yazyku. M. : IRYa RAN, 2005. S. 281–289.
11.	Karasik V. I. Aksiogennaya situatsiya kak edinitsa tsennostnoi kartiny mira // Politicheskaya lingvistika, 2014. №1 (47). S. 65–75.
12.	Karasik V. I. Narrativnoe izmerenie lingvokul'turnykh tsennostei // Yazyk i kul'tura, 2019. №4. S.59–75.
13.	Kibrik A. E. Kognitivnyi podkhod k yazyku // Yazyk i mysl' : Sovremennaya kognitivnaya lingvistika. M. : Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2015. S.29–59.
14.	Kremshokalova M. Ch. Malye zhanry ustnoi rechi kak kul'turno markirovannye teksty // Izvestiya Ross. gos. ped. un-ta im. A. I. Gertsena, 2012. № 151. S. 89–96.
15.	Kupina N. A., Pikuleva Yu. B. Aksiologicheskoe soderzhanie vnutrisemeinykh razgovorov o politike // Politicheskaya lingvistika, 2020. № 3 (81). S. 84–93.
16.	Matveeva T. V. O metode vyyavleniya tsennostnoi informatsii razgovornogo dialoga // Nauchnyi dialog, 2018. № 10. S. 89–101. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2018-10-89-101.
17.	Matveeva T. V. Praktika vyyavleniya tsennostnoi informatsii razgovornogo dialoga // Nauchnyi dialog, 2018. № 12. S. 133—151. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2018-12-133-151.
18.	Matveeva T. V. Otkrovennyi razgovor v aspekte zhanrovoi kompetentsii sobesednikov // Kommunikativnye issledovaniya, 2020. T. 7. № 3. S. 615–626. DOI: 10.24147/2413-6182.2020.7(3).615-626.
19.	Matveeva T. V. V otsutstvie otsenochnoi leksiki (na materiale rechevoi taktiki zaboty) // Aksiologicheskie aspekty sovremennykh filologicheskikh issledovanii : Tez. dokl. mezhdunar. nauch. seminara (13 maya 2020 g.). Ekaterinburg : Izd. dom «Azhur», 2020. S. 37–39.
20.	Mikhailova O. A. Zabota o blizkikh kak semeinaya tsennost' // Aksiologicheskie aspekty sovremennykh filologicheskikh issledovanii : Tez. dokl. Tret'ego mezhdunar. nauch. seminara / Pod red. Yu. N. Mikhailovoi. Ekaterinburg : Izd. dom «Azhur», 2018. S. 27–29.
21.	Mikhailova Yu. N. Nravstvennye tsennosti v besede materi s docher'yu // Aksiologicheskie aspekty sovremennykh filologicheskikh issledovanii : Tez. dokl. Tret'ego mezhdunar. nauch. seminara / Pod red. Yu. N. Mikhailovoi. Ekaterinburg : Izd. dom «Azhur», 2018. S. 19–31.
22.	Mikhailova O. A., Mikhailova Yu. N. Rechevoi konflikt v semeinom obshchenii // Nauchnyi dialog, 2018. № 11. S. 50–62. DOI:10.24224/2227-1295-2018-11-50-62.
23.	Pikuleva Yu. B. Verbalizatsiya tsennostnykh smyslov v zhanre pozdravleniya (na materiale semeinoi kommunikatsii) // Russkii yazyk: istoricheskie sud'by i sovremennost': VI Mezhdunarodnyi kongress issledovatelei russkogo yazyka (Moskva, filol. fak-t MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova, 20–23 marta 2019 g.): Tr. i mat-ly / pod obshchei redaktsiei M. L. Remnevoi i O. V. Kukushkinoi. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 2019. S. 368–369.
24.	Chulkina N. L. Rossiiskaya povsednevnost' v yazykovom soznanii : «obydennaya drebeden'» & «mir, svetyashchiisya smyslom» // Tsennosti i smysly, 2015. №2 (36). S.63–73.
25.	Shalina I. V., Pikuleva Yu. B. K probleme opisaniya metodiki lingvoaksiologicheskogo analiza (na materiale dialogicheskogo obshcheniya nositelei prostorechnoi lingvokul'tury) // Nauchnyi dialog, 2016. № 11 (59). S. 121–132.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.