К вопросу об имени текстового поля

Ван На

doi:10.25136/2409-8698.2020.3.32656


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Litera

Reference:

Van N. — To the question of the name of a text field // Litera. – 2020. – № 3. – P. 55 - 65. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8698.2020.3.32656 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=32656

To the question of the name of a text field

Van Na

Postgraduate student, the department of General and Russian Linguistics, People’s University of Friendship of Russia

117198, Russia, g. Moskav, ul. Miklukho-Maklaya, 6

vannalist@yandex.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8698.2020.3.32656

Review date:

17-04-2020

Publish date:

28-04-2020

Abstract.

This article is dedicated to the problem of the choice of name for a text semantic field formed within a literary text. The goal consists in determination of factors that hinder or preclude the naming of a text field. The subject of this research is the text semantic field observed particularly in the novels of F. M. Dostoevsky “The Idiot” and I. S. Turgenev “Home of the Gentry”. The author establishes that the text semantic field is closely connected to the contexts where elements of the field can be equitable, which complicates determination of the core and periphery of a text field, namely its name. In the course of research, the author applied the methods of analysis of scientific literature, interpretation of literary text as an aesthetic system, and method of semantic analysis. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that the author is first to discuss the question of difficulties of naming a text field using the materials of the novels “The Idiot” by F. M. Dostoevsky and “Home of the Gentry” by I. S. Turgenev. The conclusion is made that in majority of cases a text field can be named by the most frequent element therein. At the same time, the name “Idiot” in F. M. Dostoevsky’s novel does not fully reveal the content of a text field. In some instances it is impossible to name a text field (as in the novel “Home of the Gentry” by I. S. Turgenev), since elements of the field deal with the equitable mutual implication.
Keywords: polyphonic text, literary text, implication, context, field constituents, language field, field name, text field, The Noble Nest, The Idiot
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Andreeva V. A. Interpretatsiya khudozhestvennogo povestvovatel'nogo teksta kak povestvovatel'noi sistemy // Yazyk. Chelovek. Kul'tura: Mat. Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. Smolensk: SGPU, 2002. S. 13-23.
2.	Valentinova O. I. Semiotika polifonii: monografiya. M.: Izd-vo RUDN, 2005. 259 s.
3.	Valentinova O. I. Universal'nye printsipy analiza verbal'nogo iskusstva: uchebnoe posobie. M.: RUDN, 2010. 158 s.
4.	Valentinova O. I. Estetika i lingvistika polifonii: monografiya. M.: Izd-vo RUDN, 2001. 141 s.
5.	Vitkovskaya L. V. Khudozhestvennyi tekst kak kognitivnyi protsess i kognitivnaya sistema // Kognitivnaya paradigma: Tez. mezhdunar. konf. Pyatigorsk: PGLU, 2000. S. 48-50.
6.	Gassel'blat O. A. Tekstovoe assotsiativno-semanticheskoe pole «Religiya» v lirike Iosifa Brodskogo // Vestnik Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Novye gumanitarnye issledovaniya. 2014. № 3 (38). S. 179-183.
7.	Dostoevskii F. M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 30 t. T. 8: Idiot: roman. L.: Nauka, 1972. 511 s.
8.	Zimina N. Yu. Ornamental'noe pole khudozhestvennogo teksta: k opredeleniyu ponyatiya // Khudozhestvennaya literatura kak kul'turnyi ansambl': Sb. st. II Mezhdunar. konf. M.: Pero, 2016. S. 55-59.
9.	Ivanova A. A. Funktsionirovanie leksiko-semanticheskogo polya «Mechta» v angliiskom natsional'nom kommunikativnom stile // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. № 6 (260). S. 65-68.
10.	Novikov L. A. Eskiz semanticheskogo polya // L. A. Novikov. Izbrannye trudy: v 2 t. T. 2: Esteticheskie aspekty yazyka. Miscellanea. M.: Izd-vo RUDN, 2001. S. 554-570.
11.	Papulova Yu. K. O khudozhestvennom tekste kak o sinergeticheskoi sisteme // Sovremennaya filologiya: Mat. III Mezhdunar. nauchn. konf. Ufa: Leto, 2014. S. 147-153.
12.	Sternin I. A. Leksicheskoe znachenie slova v rechi. Voronezh: Izd-vo Voronezh. un-ta, 1985. 170 s.
13.	Tkachenko O. Yu. Osobennosti izucheniya leksiko-semanticheskogo polya v khudozhestvennom tekste (na primere leksiko-semanticheskogo polya moral'noi otsenki v romane F. M. Dostoevskogo «Brat'ya Karamazovy») // Mir nauki. Sotsiologiya, filologiya, kul'turologiya. 2019. T. 10. № 3. S. 2.
14.	Turgenev I. S. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii i pisem: v 30 t.; gl. red. M. P. Alekseev. T. 6: Dvoryanskoe gnezdo. Nakanune. Pervaya lyubov': 1858-1860. M.: Nauka, 1981. 495 s

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.