Статья 'Полемика с Германом Конрингом в "Дипломатике" Жана Мабильона' - журнал 'Litera' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Litera
Reference:

The polemic with Herman Conring in Jean Mabillon’s “Diplomatics”

Shchekochikhina Mariya Andreevna

Post-Graduate Student of the Department of General and Comparative Historical Language Studies, Philological Faculty at Lomonosov Moscow State University

119991, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Leninskie Gory, 1 G, kv. 430

marijnkoren@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8698.2019.6.31367

Review date:

14-11-2019


Publish date:

03-01-2020


Abstract.

This article examines the impact of Herman Conring (1606-1681) on Jean Mabillon (1632-1707). The “Diplomatics” of Jean Mabillon laid the foundations for an entire number of auxiliary disciplines of history (diplomatics, paleography, sigillography, codicology, etc.). The significance of “Diplomatics” for the history of linguistic consists in its outlook upon the writing system and language as a whole as a variable system. Herman Conring  in his work dedicated to letter from Lindau, was one of the first to formulate the principle of historicism for studying medieval artefacts. Along with Conring, Mabillon considered the letter from Lindau a forgery (although he identified in this compilation of factitious and authentic fragments the genuine features, and once voiced the opposite). There are several moments in “Diplomatics”, on which Mabillon enters into polemics with Conring. The similarity in the approaches is traced in gradual application of the principle pf historicism. In the chapter on orthography, can be seen the influence of Conring, although in this fragment Mabillon does not refer to him. The article juxtaposes the views of Corning and Mabillon on the methods of studying the artefacts. The author briefly reviews the contexts of creating the works of the two polymaths. A consistent correlation between the theoretical constructs of Corning and Mabillon has not been previously conducted within the Russian, and even world science. Such research allows understanding the evolution of knowledge on language, as well as how the science on written artefacts obtained the method that in many ways predetermined the development of philology in the following centuries.

Keywords: authencity, diploma lindaviensis, erudition, Herman Conring, Jean Mabillon, palaeography, diplomatics, history of science, orthography, medievalism
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Mabillon J. De re diplomatica libri vi […]. Editio secunda ab ipso auctore recognita, emendata et aucta, Lutetia-Parisiorum: Caroli Robustel, via Jacobea, adsigne arboris Palmae, 1709. 648 P.
2.
Dobiash-Rozhdestvenskaya O.A. Istoriya pis'ma v Srednie veka. Rukovodstvo k izucheniyu latinskoi paleografii. L.: AN SSSR, 1936. S.90.
3.
Berthrand P. Du «De re Diplomatica» au noveau traité de diplomatique: réception des textes fondamentaux d´une discipline// Dom Jean Mabillon-figure majeure de l´Europe des lettres. Paris: Académie des inscriptions et Belles-lettres, 2007. PP.605-619.
4.
Kölzer Th. Diplomatics // Handbook of Medieval Studies, edited by Albrecht Classen De Gruyeter Berlin-New York, 2010. P.407.
5.
Zouhar J. «De re Diplomatica libri sex» by Jean Mabillon in outline // Listy filologické / Folia philologica,Vol. 133, No. 3/4 (2010). PP. 357-388 .
6.
Ludewig, J. Praefatio de usu et praestantia diplomatum et diplomaticae artis. Porro de bellis diplomaticis, cum in Gallia excitatis, tum in Italia //Reliquiae manuscriptorum omnis aevi diplomatum ac monumentorum, ineditorum adhuc. Tomi tres. Francfurti et Lipsiae: 1720. 574 P.
7.
Conringus H. Censura diplomatis quod Ludovico imperatori fert acceptum coenobium lindaviense, qua simul res Imperii et Regni Francorum Ecclesiae ac Civiles, seculi cumprimis Carolovingici, illustrantur, 1672. 372 P.
8.
Papebrochius D. Propylaeum antiquarium, circa veri ac falsi discrimen in vetustis monumentis. De veterum fundationum, donationum, privilegiorum instrumentis discernendis //Acta sanctorum aprilis, tomus II. Apud Michaelem Cnobarum: Antverpiae, 1675. PP.2-32.
9.
Meyer von Knonau G. Das bellum diplomaticum lindaviense// Historische Zeitschrift, Vol.26/1, S.104.
10.
Bresslau H. Handbuch der Urkundenlehre für Deutschland und Italien: I Band. Leipzig: Verlag von Veit & Comp., 1889. SS.20-21.
11.
Conringus H. Exercitatio de germanici imperii civibus. Helamaestadi: Typis Hennningi Mulleri, 1641. 32 P.
12.
Conringus H. De Origine Juris Germanici. Commentarius Historicus. Helmstadii: Ex officina Henningi Mulleri,1643.-166 P.
13.
Ott M. (bearb.) Historischer Atlas von Bayern. Teil Schwaben. Heft 5. München: Kommission für Landesgeschichte, 1968. S.99.
14.
Wangnereck H. Standhafte Rettung des Klosters contra acta Lindaviensia. Embsii ad Rhen, 1646. 590 P.
15.
Heider D. Gründliche Außführung, wessen sich deß H. Reichs Stadt Lindaw, wegen einer Ihro in anno 1628 ohnversehens abgelöster, und dem Herrn Grafen von Monfort administratorio nomine, sampt mitergriffenen vier Dörffern, überlassner; Folgends in anno 1638 der Ertzherzogin in Claudiae Fürstl. Durchleucht. pendente lite cedirter Reichs-Pfandschafft, beedes in possessorio in peditorio wider menniglich zu halten, zu behelfen und zu getrösten hab. Nürnberg: Endter, 1643. 971 S.
16.
Fuhrman H. Die Fälschungen im Mittelalter: Überlegungen zum mittelalterlichen Wahrheitsbegriff //Historische Zeitschrift, Bd. 197, H.3 (Dec.1963). S.544
17.
Savilla J. M. Antiquarismus, Hagiographie und Historie im 17 Jahrhundert. Zum Werk der Bollandisten. Ein Wissenschaftshistorischer Versuch. Tübingen, 2009. 692 P.
18.
Tentzelius W.E. Historicae Vindiciae pro Herm Conringii censura in diploma fundationis fictium lindaviense oppositae justae difensioni ab ipso Coenobio in favorem praedicti diplomatis anni 1681 Constantiae typis evulgato.Lindaviae 1700 P.19
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website