Статья 'Франсишку Са де Миранда: две традиции восприятия' - журнал 'Litera' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Litera
Reference:

Francisco Sa de Miranda: Two Traditions of Perception

Chernov Anton Vladimirovich

Lecturer of the Department of Foreign Languages at Institute of Social Studies under Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

119571, Russia, Moskva, g. Moscow, ul. Pr.vernadskogo, 82, Korp.2, 82, korp.2

antoniocernini@yandex.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8698.2019.1.28889

Review date:

06-02-2019


Publish date:

07-02-2019


Abstract.

The subject of the research is the two traditions of perceiving the image and style of the Portugese Renaisance poet Francisco Sa de Miranda that offered two approaches to historical interpretation of the poet's legacy. The first tradition was developed by the younger contemporaries of Sa de Miranda and the second was offered by the researchers of the XIXth, XXth and XXIst centuries. The author of the article analyzes the points where the aforesaid two traditions contradict. The main goal of the article is to provide a detailed description and analysis of the above mentioned contradictions. The key method used by the author of the article is the comparitive analysis of texts. As a result of the comparison of two approaches to perceiving the image and style of Francisco Sa de Miranda, the author has discovered principal differences of these two traditions. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the comparative analysis of texts that describe characteristics of the image and style of Sa de Miranda may be also referred to the works of the younger contemporaries of the poet and thus covers texts dated the XVIth, XIXth, XXth and XXIst centries. The author focuses on different interpretations of the poet's style according to two traditions, Renaissance tradition (the XVIth century) and modern tradition (XIX, XX and XXI). This is the first research in the academic literature that states and provides a detailed analysis of the ideological differences of aforesaid traditions which comprises the novelty of the research. The conclusions made by the author may be of great use for further researches on Portuguese Renaissance literature. 

Keywords: European poetry, European literature, Portuguese literature, Russian literary criticism, Portuguese literary criticism, Sá de Miranda, Portuguese poetry, Renaissance literature, European literary studies, poetry of XVI century
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Braga T. História da literatura portuguesa. Lisboa, 1870.
2.
Carneiro D. Sá de Miranda e a sua obra. Lisboa, 1895.
3.
Poesias de Francisco Sa de Miranda. Edição de Carolina Michaelis de Vasconcelos. Halle, 1885.
4.
Cardoso Bernardes J. A. O bucolismo português: a égloga do Renascimento ao Maneirismo. Coimbra, 1988.
5.
Carlos Ascenso A. [Recensão a] José Augusto Cardoso Bernardes – O bucolismo português: a égloga do Renascimento ao Maneirismo. Coimbra, 1988 // Humanitatis. XXXIX – XL. Coimbra. 1987-1988.
6.
Osório J. A. Entre a tradição e a inovação. Sá de Miranda na esteira de Garcilaso: em torno do debate poético da écloga “Alejo”. 1985 // Revista da Faculdade de Letras (Universidade do Porto). Línguas e Literatura. Vol. II, 1985.
7.
Maldonado Baena da Silva M. F. A comédia clássica de Sa de Miranda e o diálogo intertextual com os seus paradigmas literários. São Paulo. 2006.
8.
M. M. de Arruda Franco M. M. Ainda a redescoberta de Sá de Miranda no século XX: Carlito Azeveso e Alexandre O`Neill. Boletim do CESP. V. 20, n. 26 – jan./jun. 2000. P. 61 – 80.
9.
Chernov A. V. Fransishku Sa de Miranda v otechestvennom literaturovedenii // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. N8 (62) 2016. Chast' 2. Tambov, 2016. S. 36 – 41.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website