Статья 'Экфрасис как средство выражения религиозных взглядов Ап. Григорьева' - журнал 'Litera' - NotaBene.ru
по

 

 

Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Litera
Reference:

Ekphrasis as the Expressive Means of Appolon Grigoreiv's Religious Views

Seredina Anna Olegovna

post-graduate student of the Department of the History of Russian Literature, Philological Faculty at Lomonosov Moscow State University, researchr at Gorky Institute of World Literature

119234, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Leninskie Gory, 1, of. 51

Serenaphil@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8698.2018.3.27345

Review date:

02-09-2018


Publish date:

09-09-2018


Abstract.

In her research Seredina considers religious and aesthetic views of Apollon Grigoriev reflected on the poetics of his fiction and epistolary heritage. The focus is on religious ecphrasis, that is, descriptions of icons, images of the Madonna, frescoes, temples and monasteries. An extensive material is drawn such as texts of Grigoriev’s early prose of the mid-1840s, essays and letters of the turn of the 1850s-1860s, as well as the final work of the writer, the memoirs "My Literary and Moral Wanderings". The theoretical basis for the immanent comparative analysis is the works of N.V. Braginskaya, N.G. Morozova, E.V. Yatsenko on ecphrasis. The study found that Appolon Grigoriev put forward different requirements in evaluating a secular work of art and a work claiming to be sacred. The author of the article also traces the peculiarities of interaction between the categories of nationality and sacredness in the concepts of Appolon Grigoriev. In this article Seredina continues her analysis of the theme of ecphrasis in the prosaic heritage of Appolon Grigorieva who had not previously attracted the special attention of literary critics.

Keywords: letters, memoirs, prose, Apollon Grigoriev, architecture, painting, religious ekphrasis, Madonna, pochvennichestvo, Moscow
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Braginskaya N. V. Ekfrasis kak tip teksta (K probleme strukturnoi klassifikatsii) // Slavyanskoe i balkanskoe yazykoznanie: Karpato-vostochnoslavyanskie paralleli. Struktura balkanskogo teksta. M.: Nauka, 1977. S. 259–283.
2.
Voloshko A. V. Religioznoe mirovozzrenie V.A. Zhukovskogo v prizhiznennoi kritike i dorevolyutsionnom literaturovedenii // «Naukovі zapiski KhNPU іm. G.S. Skovorodi». 2014. № 3 (79). Ch. 2. S. 23–35.
3.
Geller L. Voskreshenie ponyatiya, ili Slovo ob ekfrasise // Ekfrasis v russkoi literature: trudy Lozannskogo simpoziuma / red. L. Geller. M.: Izdatel'stvo «MIK», 2002. C. 5–22.
4.
Geller L. Ekfrasis, ili Obnazhenie priema. Neskol'ko voprosov i tezis // «Nevyrazimo vyrazimoe»: ekfrasis i problemy reprezentatsii vizual'nogo v khudozhestvennom tekste: Sbornik statei / Sost. i nauchn. red. D. V. Tokareva. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2013. S. 44–60.
5.
Grigor'ev A. A. Odisseya poslednego romantika: Poemy. Stikhotvoreniya. Drama. Proza. Pis'ma. Vospominaniya ob Apollone Grigor'eve / Sost., vstup. st. i primech. A.L. Ospovat. M.: Mosk. rabochii, 1988. 495 s.
6.
Grigor'ev A. A. Vospominaniya / Podgot. B. Egorov. Otv. red. S. A. Reiser. M.: Nauka, 1980. 439 s.
7.
Grigor'ev A. A. Oppozitsiya zastoya. Cherty iz istorii mrakobesiya // Grigor'ev A. A. Estetika i kritika / Sost. A. I. Zhuravleva. M.: Iskusstvo, 1980. S. 275–311.
8.
Grigor'ev A. A. Pis'ma / Podgot. R. Vittaker, B. F. Egorov. Otv. red. I. G. Ptushkina. M.: Nauka, 1999. 473 s.
9.
Konstantini M. Ekfrasis: ponyatie literaturnogo analiza ili bessoderzhatel'nyi termin? // «Nevyrazimo vyrazimoe»: ekfrasis i problemy reprezentatsii vizual'nogo v khudozhestvennom tekste: Sbornik statei / Sost. i nauchn. red. D. V. Tokareva. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2013. S. 29–34.
10.
Mednis N. E. «Religioznyi ekfrasis» v russkoi literature // Kritika i semiotika. Vyp. 10. Novosibirsk, 2006. S. 58–67.
11.
Morozova N. G. Ekfrasis v proze russkogo romantizma. Dis. … kand. filol. nauk. Novosibirsk 2006. 210 s.
12.
Ostapenko M. Yu. Virtual'naya rekonstruktsiya kolokol'ni Strastnogo monastyrya (XVIII – pervaya polovina XIX v.): opyt postroeniya 3D-modeli // Istoricheskaya informatika. 2014, № 2–3. S. 42–49.
13.
Pamyatniki arkhitektury Moskvy. Zamoskvorech'e / G. V. Makarevich, B. G. Al'tshuller, V. I. Baldin, L. A. David, E. D. Dobrovol'skaya i dr. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. 317 s.
14.
Pisarchik T. P. Problema religii v filosofskom mirovozzrenii Apollona Grigor'eva // Vestnik OGU № 7 (191) / iyul' 2009. S. 88–92.
15.
Rozhdestvenskaya M. V. «Etogo v sbornike ne chitai, mnogim ne pokazyvai...» // Apokrify Drevnei Rusi / Sost., predisl. M. Rozhdestvenskoi. SPb.: Amfora, 2002. S. 5–16.
16.
Seredina A. O. «Moskva» kak ideal'nyi topos v khudozhestvennoi proze Ap. Grigor'eva // Nauchnyi dialog. 2017. № 11. S. 264–284.
17.
Seredina A. O. Rol' topoekfrasisa v utverzhdenii pochvennicheskikh idei (Na materiale khudozhestvennoi prozy Ap. Grigor'eva) // Mirgorod. T. 9. 2017. S. 79–95.
18.
Seredina A. O. Funktsii ekfrasisa v khudozhestvennoi proze Ap. Grigor'eva // Teoriya i istoriya ekfrasisa: Itogi i perspektivy izucheniya / Kollektivnaya monografiya pod nauchn. red. T. Avtukhovich pri uchastii R. Mnikha i T. Bovsunovskoi. Siedlce: Wydawnictwo Naukowe IKR[i]BL, 2018. C. 579–595.
19.
Soboleva L. S. Ustnaya i rukopisnaya traditsii apokrificheskogo syuzheta «Son Bogoroditsy» // Fol'klor Urala. Vyp. 11: Ustnaya i rukopisnaya traditsii. Sverdlovsk, 2000. S. 209–246.
20.
Yatsenko E. V. «Lyubite zhivopis', poety…». Ekfrasis kak khudozhestvenno-mirovozzrencheskaya model' // Voprosy filosofii. 2011. № 11. C. 47–58
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website