|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Litera
Reference:
Mielkov I. —
'The Rose of the World' as a Philosophical Issue
// Litera.
– 2013. – ¹ 4.
– P. 34 - 71.
DOI: 10.7256/2306-1596.2013.4.10999
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=10999
'The Rose of the World' as a Philosophical Issue
Mielkov Yurii
PhD in Philosophy
student for a doctor's degree of the Department of Philosophy and Methodology of Science at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
01033, Ukraine, Kiev, ul. Vladimirskaya 60
|
ym173@ya.ru
|
|
 |
Abstract. Daniil Leonidovich Andreyev's creative work is a unique phenomenon of the Russian and not only the Russian culture of the XX century. Now its research, as a rule, or is limited to the philological party of a question, or serves as a studying subject as one of forms of religious creativity in the spirit of "New Age". However only the philosophical analysis can provide complete and substantial consideration of "A world rose" as project which includes at the same time both literary, and profestichesky, and socio-political aspects. The philosophy practically has no methodology of research mystical (or pseudo-mystical) experience, however, in article is applied ðàöèîíàëüíûéè germenevtichesky approach to studying of "A world rose". Daniil Andreyev's creativity is quite capable to act as a subject of the versatile philosophical analysis. The idea of "A world rose" as future interreligiya is capable to appear before the modern researcher as a being self-disproved prophecy, as the detailed description of such way of a koevolyution of the world and the person to whom the way alternative was preferred more than half-century ago. The poetic hobby of the author for unfulfilled social and utopian projects has to be not the cause for discredit of its mystical experience, imperfect the verbalization of this experience undertaken by it, but motivation as for serious philosophical research of transphysical and metahistorical ideas of D. L. Andreyev, and in general for studying of essence of mysticism, conceptualization ways òåîäèöåè and findings of the answer to requirement of implementation of optimum arrangement of society of the XXI century.
Keywords:
Daniil Andreev, Roza Mira (The Rose of the World) , mysticism, social utopism, Russian religious philosophy, eschatology, occultism, sectionalism, prophesies of our time, the Third World War
DOI: 10.7256/2306-1596.2013.4.10999
Article was received:
09-02-2014
Review date:
10-02-2014
Publish date:
1-12-2013
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian
here
.
References
|
1.
|
Andreev D. L. Zheleznaya misteriya // Andreev D. L. Sobranie sochinenii: V 3-kh tt. – T. 3, Kn. 1. – M. : Uraniya, 1996. – S. 5–312.
|
|
2.
|
Andreev D. L. Roza mira // Andreev D. L. Sobranie sochinenii: V 3-kh tt. – T. 2. – M. : Uraniya, 1997. – 608 s.
|
|
3.
|
Andreev D. L. Iz tyuremnogo dnevnika // Andreev D. L. Sobranie sochinenii: V 3-kh tt. – T. 3, Kn. 2. – M. : Uraniya, 1997. – S. 261–264.
|
|
4.
|
Andreeva A. A. Roman «Stranniki nochi» // Andreev D. L. Sobranie sochinenii: V 3-kh tt. – T. 3, Kn. 1. – M. : Uraniya, 1996. – S. 609–622.
|
|
5.
|
Beme Ya. Avrora, ili Utrennyaya zarya v voskhozhdenii: Per. s nem. – M. : Musaget, 1914. – 416 s. (reprintnoe izdanie – M. : Politizdat, 1990.)
|
|
6.
|
Beme Ya. Christosophia, ili Put' ko Khristu: Per. s nem. – Spb : A-cad, 1994. – 224 s.
|
|
7.
|
Zhizn' i trudy prepodobnogo Lavrentiya Chernigovskogo // Sv. Dimitrii Rostovskii. Zhitiya svyatykh. – Kiev : Izdanie Svyato-Uspenskoi Kievo-Pecherskoi Lavry, 2000. – Kn. 12. – S. 777–811.
|
|
8.
|
Zavatskaya Ya. Chernaya kniga ili priklyucheniya bludnogo okkul'tista. – http://samlib.ru/z/zawackaja_j_j/istoria.shtml.
|
|
9.
|
Kudryashov K. V., prof. Aleksandr Pervyi i taina Fedora Koz'micha. – Pg. : Vremya, 1923. – 96 s. (reprintnoe izdanie – M. : [B. izd.], 1990.)
|
|
10.
|
Kuraev A. Kak otnosit'sya k «Roze Mira»? // Daniil Andreev. Pro et contra. – SPb. : Izd-vo RKhGI, 2010. – S. 352–357.
|
|
11.
|
Nalimov V. V. Pochemu byl tak nuzhen nam Daniil Andreev? // Daniil Andreev v kul'ture KhKh veka. – M. : Mir Uranii, 2000. – S. 186–189.
|
|
12.
|
Palei A. I. Ideinoe nasledie Daniila Andreeva: pro et contra (postanovka problemy) (ispravlennyi i dopolnennyi variant ocherka, opublikovannogo v zhurnale «Kontinent», ¹ 109, oktyabr' 2001). – http://proroza.narod.ru/palei.htm.
|
|
13.
|
Romanov B. N. «Russkie bogi» Daniila Andreeva // Andreev D. L. Sobranie sochinenii: V 3-kh tt. – T. 1. – M. : Moskovskii rabochii; Firma Alesya, 1993. – S. 432–445.
|
|
14.
|
Florenskii P. A., svyashch. U vodorazdelov mysli // Florenskii P. A., svyashch. Sobranie sochinenii: V 4 kh tt. – T. 3. – Ch. 1. – M. : Mysl', 2000. – 624 s.
|
|
15.
|
Chukov B. V. O poslednikh perekatakh zhizni Daniila Andreeva // Daniil Andreev. Neizdannoe / Sost. A. A. Kuteinikova, B. V. Chukov. – M. : Mir Uranii, 2006. – S. 265–311.
|
|
16.
|
Epshtein M. N. Roza Mira i tsarstvo antikhrista: o paradoksakh russkoi eskhatologii // Daniil Andreev. Pro et contra. – SPb. : Izd-vo RKhGI, 2010. – S. 417–474.
|
|
17.
|
Epstein M. Materialism, Sophiology, and the Soul of Russia: Daniel Andreev and Russian Feminine Mysticism // Urania. – No. 4, 1993. – Pp. 19–22; No. 5, 1994. – Pp. 21–25.
|
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
