Статья 'Оценка стратегий критического мышления человека новой генерации' - журнал 'Социодинамика' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Sociodynamics
Reference:

Assessment of strategic thinking of a human of new generation

Ivanova Ol'ga

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor, the department of Economics, Management and Law, South Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University

454080, Russia, g. Chelyabinsk, pr. Lenina, 69, aud. 254

74oliva@list.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7144.2019.6.29987

Review date:

12-06-2019


Publish date:

16-06-2019


Abstract.

The subject of this research is the strategies of critical thinking. The goal of this research lies in analytical assessments of the strategies of critical thinking and determination of the potential for application of disposition, The author attempt to substantiate the relevance of referring to self-assessment of the strategies of critical thinking, reveals the essence and correlation of the strategies of critical thinking, analyze self-assessment of the level of affective strategies, cognitive macro abilities and cognitive micro skills, estimate and interpret the results of the study. The article thoroughly examines the importance of improvement of the strategies of critical thinking as an instrument for analytical solution of the issues that ensures a long-term independent, purposeful, justified, reflexive, controlled human thinking process. Special attention is given to the problem of the competency of skills of critical thinking among the representatives of the new (digital) generation in the conditions of information excessiveness. Methodology is founded on the transdisciplinary concept of critical thinking. The scientific novelty consists in analytical assessment of the affective and cognitive strategies of critical thinking based on self-assessment of the representatives of digital generation. The concept of integration of strategies of critical thinking that would expand the field of their application is substantiated. The author determines the growth points of the critical thinking skills, as well as the strategically advanced vectors for its improvement: Socratic discussion and critical reading. The author’s special contribution is the conclusion on the analytical instrumentality and the need for targeted systematic improvement of the strategies of critical thinking in dialogical communication in both, the educational and professional spheres.

Keywords: strategies, reflexive thinking, cognitive microskills, cognitive macro abilities, affective strategies, problem, critical thinking, critical analysis, communication, digital generation
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Boyazitova I. V., Belous V. V., Romashchenko S. V. Issledovanie navykov kriticheskogo myshleniya i ikh effektivnosti u studentov na raznykh etapakh obucheniya v vuze Romashchenko // Psikhologiya. Istoriko-kriticheskie obzory i sovremennye issledovaniya. 2016. T.5. № 6A. S. 189-201.
2.
Brenif'e O. Iskusstvo filosofskoi praktiki: filosofskie ustanovki // Sotsium i vlast'. 2018. № 1 (69). S. 80-87.
3.
Volkov E. N. 35 aspektov kriticheskogo myshleniya: strategicheskii spisok. URL: https://evolkov.net/critic.think/Paul.R/Paul.R.Critical.thinking.21.html.
4.
Volkov E. N. Nauchenie nauchnomu (kriticheskomu) myshleniyu i vizual'naya ob''ektivizatsiya znanii: soderzhanie, praktika, instrumenty // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Sotsial'nye nauki. 2016. № 2 (42). S. 199-203.
5.
Kalashnikova N. A., Tokareva S. B. Kriticheskoe myshlenie, logicheskaya kul'tura lichnosti i modeli vozmozhnogo mira // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 7. Filosofiya. 2016. № 4 (34). S. 183-187.
6.
Klimanova A. V. Predstavleniya o kriticheskom myshlenii v soznanii sovremennoi molodezhi // Izvestiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gertsena. 2016. № 180. S. 51-58.
7.
Ozimko K. Sotsiologiya pokoleniya Z. URL: https://www.sonar2050.org/publications/sociologiya-pokoleniya-z.
8.
Pis'mo Minobrnauki Rossii ot 21.01.2019 № MN-2.1/222 «O primenenii aktualizirovannykh federal'nykh gosudarstvennykh obrazovatel'nykh standartov vysshego obrazovaniya». URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_316416.
9.
Temnova L. V., Mednikova M. M. Vliyanie virtual'nogo prostranstva na kommunikatsiyu predstavitelei pokolenii Z i Y // Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. 2017. № 11. S. 19-23.
10.
Tikhonova V. L. Formirovanie kriticheskogo myshleniya – osnova vospitaniya liderskikh kachestv studenchestva // Manuskript. 2018. № 10 (96). S 92-95.
11.
Khaidegger M. Evropeiskii nigilizm / Vremya i bytie. Stat'i i vystupleniya. M.: Respublika, 1993. S. 63-176.
12.
Khalpern D. Psikhologiya kriticheskogo myshleniya. SPb.: Piter, 2000. 512 s.
13.
Shcheglova I. A., Koreshnikova Yu. N., Parshina O. A. Rol' studencheskoi vovlechennosti v razvitii kriticheskogo myshleniya // Voprosy obrazovaniya. 2019. № 1. S. 264-289. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2019-1-264-289.
14.
Bermingham M. Clearing up «Critical Thinking»: Its Four Formidable Features // Creative Education. 2015. Vol. 6. N. 4. R. 421-427.
15.
Facione P. A. Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Research Findings and Recommendations. American Philosophical Association. Newark, Del., California State University, Fullerton, 1990. 112 p.
16.
Facione P. A., Facione N. C. The Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric – HCTSR. A Tool for Developing and Evaluating Critical Thinking. URL: https://www.insightassessment.com/Resources/Teaching-Training-and-Learning-Tools/Holistic-Critical-Thinking-Scoring-Rubric-HCTSR.
17.
Facione P., Sanchez C. A., Facione N. C., & Gainen J. The Disposition toward Critical Thinking // The Journal of General Education. 1995. № 44. R. 1-25.
18.
Generation Z – Agents of Change. How the workforce’s newest entrants can spark business transformation. 16.01.2017. URL: https://www.capita.com/media/2198/generation-z-whitepaper-digital.pdf.
19.
Global Challenge Insight Report. The Future of Jobs Employment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum. January 2016. URL: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf.
20.
Hiring 2013 College Graduates. URL: https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/trends-and-forecasting/research-and-surveys/Pages/hiring2013collegegraduates.aspx.
21.
Kuh G. D. The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties. Bloomington, Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research. 2001. URL: http://nsse.indiana.edu/pdf/psychometric_framework_2002.pdf.
22.
Lipman M. Thinking in education. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013. 316 p.
23.
Paul R. W. Critical Thinking: What Every Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly Changing World. Tomales, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking, 2012. 572 r.
24.
Pike G. R., Smart J. C. & Ethington C. A. The mediating effects of student engagement on the Relationships between academic disciplines and learning outcomes: An extension of Holland's theory // Research in Higher Education. 2012. № 53 (5). P. 550-575.
25.
Porter S. R. Self-Reported Learning Gains: A Theory and Test of College Student Survey Response // Research in Higher Education. 2013. Vol. 54. № 2. P. 201-226. DOI: 10.1007/s11162-012-9277-0.
26.
Sharil Mat S. M., Mahbob N. N., Baharudin N. S. Overview of «Generation Z» behavioural characteristic and its effect towards hostel facility // International Journal of Real Estate Studies. 2017. Vol. 11. № 2. P. 59-67.
27.
Sola E., Hoekstra R., Fiore S., McCauley P. An Investigation of the State of Creativity and Critical Thinking in Engineering Undergraduates // Creative Education. 2017. № 8. P. 1495-1522. DOI: 10.4236/ce.2017.89105.
28.
The Digital Universe of Opportunities: Rich Data and the Increasing Value of the Internet of Things (2014, April). URL: https://www.emc.com/leadership/digital-universe/2014iview/executive-summary.htm.
29.
Tulgan B. Meet Generation Z: The second generation within the giant «Millennial» cohort. URL: http://www.rainmakerthinking.com/assets/uploads/2013/10/Gen-Z-Whitepaper.pdf.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website