по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial Board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Peculiarities of application of the category of public good to the analysis of performance and institutional arrangement of space activities
Payson Dmitry

Member of the International Academy of Astronautics

129090, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Gilyarovskogo, 1

dpayson@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

This article examines the fundamental categories of targeted activity, including subjectivity and performance applicable to the modern space activities, as well as discusses the problematic questions of generation public good in the activity of hybrid corporate-public actors. This work is aimed at developing theoretical grounds for institutional projecting and organizational structuring in the area of space activities pertaining to space research and exploration, as well as elaborating alternate versions of organizational design that would ensure efficiency of such efforts with consideration of current institutional trajectory. The methodological base consists primarily of the principle of methodological individualism, viewed from the perspective the impact upon the targeted work of the researchers, explorer, and applied use of space, as well as analysis of results of the work using the value chains. The article also uses the general approaches towards analyzing the inter-sectoral cooperation in economics, as well as the theories of public good. The scientific novelty is defined by the identification of the peculiarities of application of the principles of targeted work by the members of space activities pertaining to state and private sectors; conducted analysis of emergence of specific public good in this sphere; peculiarities of the work of particular corporate-public actors and risks of emergence of institutional traps; proposed versions of organizational arrangement of the tasks of generating public good in the area of space activities. The main conclusion lies in the need for special organizational arrangement of this vector of space activities in terms of the work of hybrid corporate-public actors.

Keywords: Private good, Public good, Institutional trap, Value chains, Space exploration, Space research, Space activities, Intersectoral relationship, Corporate / Public actor, Virtual actor

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8647.2018.4.27646

Article was received:

12-10-2018


Review date:

11-10-2018


Publish date:

15-10-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Federal'nyi zakon ot 13 iyulya 2015 g. № 215-FZ «O Gosudarstvennoi korporatsii po kosmicheskoi deyatel'nosti «Roskosmos» // SZ RF. 2015. № 29 (Ch. I). St. 4341.
2.
Kosenkov I.A. Novye kosmicheskie rynki: Rukovoditel' napravleniya «Kosmicheskie tekhnologii» Fonda «Skolkovo» Ivan Kosenkov — o gorizontakh kosmonavtiki budushchego // Izvestiya (elektronnaya versiya). 2018. 29 iyunya. URL: https://iz.ru/760331/ivan-kosenkov/novye-kosmicheskie-rynki (data obrashcheniya: 08.10.2018).
3.
State of The Satellite Industry // Satellite Industry Association. URL: https://www.sia.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/2018-SSIR-2-Pager-Sep-30-2018.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 08.10.2018)
4.
Paison D.B. Kosmicheskaya promyshlennost' «novaya» i «staraya»: uroki i perspektivy sovmestnogo razvitiya // Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost'. 2013. № 16. S. 2-10.
5.
Frolov I.E. Razvitie mirovykh vysokotekhnologichnykh proizvodstv i kosmicheskie rynki: smozhet li kosmonavtika stat' novym global'nym novovvedeniem? // Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii. 2017. № 4 (79). S. 43-57.
6.
Kats I.S. Evolyutsiya institutsional'nykh innovatsii v obshchestvennom sektore // Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii. 2018. № 2. T.15. S. 291-308.
7.
Kirdina S.G. Metodologicheskii individualizm i metodologicheskii institutsionalizm. M.: Institut ekonomiki, 2013. - 53 s. URL: http://kirdina.ru/doc/news/10jan15/1.pdf (data obrashcheniya 8.10.2018).
8.
Federal'nyi zakon ot 26 iyulya 2006 g. № 135-FZ «O zashchite konkurentsii» // SZ RF. 2006. № 31 (Ch. 1). St. 3434.
9.
The Case for Space 2015. The impact of space on the UK economy L.: London Economics, 2015 – 140 pp. URL: http://www.ukspace.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/LE-Case-for-Space-2015-Full-Report.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 08.10.2018).
10.
Nelson P.L., Block W.E. Space Capitalism: How Humans will Colonize Planets, Moons, and Asteroids. Palgrave Studies in Classical Liberalism. Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. - 317 p.
11.
Paison D.B. Biznes-modeli i peredel'naya struktura sovremennykh kosmicheskikh uslug // Tekhnologii i sredstva svyazi. Spetsial'nyi vypusk «Sputnikovaya svyaz' i veshchanie-2016». № 6. 2015. S. 62-66.
12.
Grimard M. Economical Sustainability of the Space Value Chain: Role of Government, Industry, and Private Investors // Toulouse Space Show 2012: IISL/IAA Space Law and Policy Symposium Session 1a: Towards effective sustainability for outer space activities. 2012.
13.
Federal'nyi zakon ot 20 avgusta 1993 g. №5663-1 «O kosmicheskoi deyatel'nosti» (v red. ot 07.03.2018) // Rossiiskaya gazeta. 1993. 6 oktyabrya; SZ RF. 2018. № 11. St.1581.
14.
OECD Handbook on Measuring the Space Economy. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2012. – 112 p.
15.
Yanik A.A. K kontseptsii «kosmicheskoi ekonomiki» // Trendy i upravlenie. 2018. № 1. S.51-66.
16.
Paison D.B. Kosmicheskaya deyatel'nost': Evolyutsiya, organizatsiya, instituty. M.: Knizhnyi dom «LIBROKOM», 2010. – 312 s.
17.
Paison D.B. K formirovaniyu metodologii vybora i obosnovaniya programm pilotiruemykh kosmicheskikh poletov // Pilotiruemye polety v kosmos. № 2 (4). 2012. S. 26-35.
18.
Akhinov G.A. Ekonomika obshchestvennogo sektora . 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: INFRA-M, 2018. – 341 s.
19.
Yanik A.A. Kosmicheskie programmy i problemy otsenki sotsietal'nogo vozdeistviya proektov Big Science // Issledovaniya kosmosa. 2017. № 3. S.216-227.
20.
Ovodovskaya I.V. Razvitie konkurentsii v sfere proizvodstva obshchestvennykh blag. Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata ekonomicheskikh nauk/ Ovodovskaya I.V.// GOU VPO «Saratovskii gosudarstvennyi sotsial'no-ekonomicheskii universitet». Saratov, 2006. – 152 s.
21.
NOAA Commercial Space Policy. U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 2016. – 13 p. URL: http://www.corporateservices.noaa.gov/ames/administrative_orders/chapter_217/Commercial%20Space%20Policy.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 08.10.2018).
22.
Denis G., Pasco X. The Challenge of Future Space Systems and Services in Europe: Industrial Competitiveness Without a Level Playing Field // New Space. 2015. Vol.3 No.1. Pp. 44–58.
23.
Kosenkov I.A., Paison D.B. Rol' gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva v strategicheskom razvitii natsional'noi kosmicheskoi deyatel'nosti Rossii // Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost'. 2012. № 12. S. 2-8.
24.
Bendikov M.A. Gosudarstvenno-chastnoe partnerstvo kak mekhanizm razvitiya innovatsionnoi infrastruktury // Audit i finansovyi analiz. 2016. №1. S.357-366.
25.
Paison D.B. Matrichnoe modelirovanie vzaimodeistviya uchastnikov tsepochek sozdaniya tsennosti v zadachakh upravleniya strukturnymi preobrazovaniyami raketno-kosmicheskoi promyshlennosti // Problemy upravleniya. № 6. 2016. S. 26-34.
26.
Prasad N., Rajagopalan R. Space India 2.0 - Commerce, Policy, Security and Governance Perspectives // New Dehli, ORF, 2017. - 389 p. URL: https://www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/ORF_Space-India-2.0.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 08.10.2018).
27.
Kolosova E.V., Novikov D.A., Tsvetkov A.V. Metodika osvoennogo ob''ema v operativnom upravlenii proektami. M.: OOO «NITs «Apostrof», 2000. – 156 s.
28.
Stewart J., Walsh K. Change in the management of public services // Public Administration. 1992. Vol.70. Issue 4. Pp. 499-518. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1992.tb00952.x (data obrashcheniya: 08.10.2018).
29.
Brummitt, A. Nostalgia Marketing: Turning that Warm, Fuzzy Feeling Into Cold, Hard Cash // Medium, 29.03.2017. URL: https://becominghuman.ai/nostalgia-marketing-turning-that-warm-fuzzy-feeling-into-cold-hard-cash-8b2a93aed39c (data obrashcheniya: 08.10.2018).
30.
Polterovich V. M. Institutsional'nye lovushki i ekonomicheskie reformy // Rossiiskaya ekonomicheskaya shkola. M. , 1998. – 42 s.
31.
Roskosmos mozhet sozdat' sluzhbu tekhzakazchika dlya povysheniya kachestva tekhniki / /ITAR-TASS. 2018. 14 sentyabrya. URL: https://tass.ru/kosmos/5567400 (data obrashcheniya: 08.10.2018).
32.
Milgrom P., Roberts Dzh. Ekonomika, organizatsiya i menedzhment: v 2-kh t. / per. s angl. SPb.: Ekonomicheskaya shkola, 1999. T. 1 – 472 s.; T. 2 – 424 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website