Статья 'Институциональные аспекты межгосударственной интеграции стран-участников Союзного государства в инновационной сфере ' - журнал 'Теоретическая и прикладная экономика' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial Board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Theoretical and Applied Economics
Reference:

Institutional Aspects in Transnational Integration of the Union State Members in the Innovation Sphere

Sokolov Maxim

PhD in Economics

Associate Professor at the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Department of State and Municipal Administration 

117997, Russia, g. Moscow, per. Stremyannyi, 36, of. 549

maxim-sokolof@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Abramov Ruslan

Doctor of Economics

Professor at the Department of Public and Municipal Management of Plekhanov Russian University of Economics 

115470, Russia, Moscow, nab. Nagatinskaya, 34

oef08@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8647.2017.2.22950

Review date:

08-05-2017


Publish date:

13-07-2017


Abstract.

CIS countries typically demonstrate a rather low level of R&D/GDP intensity and low share of expenditures for science, low development of hightech economic sector and negative saldo of the trade balance in relation to innovative products. At the same time, problems of transnational integration in the sphere of innovation within the Union State started to attract interest of researchers at the turn of the 2011 - 2012. One of research aspects is the need to develop efficient instruments that would ensure efficient transnational integration of Russia and Belarus in the innovation sphere. The object of the present research is the integration of Russia and Belarus within the Union State. The subject of the research is the combination of institutions that provide for the integration of the Union States in the innovation sphere. The authors of the article pay special attention to institutional issues and integration prospects of the Union State members in the innovation sphere including the need to develop a single strategy that would guarantee productivity and efficiency of all institutions under research. The methodological basis of the research involves analysis of fundamental researches and modern theoretical researches in the sphere of institution development, innovation activity and transnational integration including that within the Union State. Based on the analysis carried out, the authors have defined the key problems and development prospects for Russia's and Belarus' institutions that ensure the development of integration processes in the innovation sphere. In conclusion, the authors agree with experts and researchers, both Russian and Belorussian, and come to the conclusion that despite numerous institutional and political issues, the authorities, business entities and social communities of the Union State members understand the need to activate the innovation cooperation. In 2012 during the Union State Programs Forum held in Minsk it was underlined that innovation activity is the guarantee of stability both of an individual entity and state in general, that being true for the Union State, too. Thus, it is important to develop transnational information research data base of fundamental and applied problems that would ensure active information exchange between specialists from different countries and strengthen legal basis in the sphere of protection of rights to intellectual activity products as well as to activate process of creating and developing regional and national innovation networks. Implementation of the above described transformations will require to create new institutions as well as to develop institutions that already exist in the innovation sphere which makes the rationale of the present research.  

Keywords: Union State, mechanism, strategy, program, import substitution, innovation system, innovation network, institution, innovations, integration
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Abramov R.A., Sokolov M.S. Analiz effektivnosti klasternykh proektov Soyuznogo gosudarstva // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. 2017. № 1. S. 18–32. URL: http://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=20732(data obrashcheniya: 08.04.2017).
2.
Abramov R.A., Sokolov M.S. Edinoe innovatsionnoe prostranstvo Soyuznogo gosudarstva: osobennosti i faktory razvitiya // Problemy strategicheskogo razvitiya mezhstranovoi integratsii natsional'nykh innovatsionnykh sistem Soyuznogo gosudarstva. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii rossiiskikh i zarubezhnykh universitetov i REU im. G.V. Plekhanova. – Moskva: OOO «ID Tret'yakov''», 2016. S. 20-22.
3.
Antonov V.A., Korneev A. N. Opyt innovatsionnogo sotrudnichestva Rossiiskoi Federatsii i Respubliki Belarus' v usloviyakh stanovleniya Soyuznogo gosudarstva // Internet-zhurnal Naukovedenie. 2014. №4 (23). URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/opyt-innovatsionnogo-sotrudnichestva-rossiyskoy-federatsii-i-respubliki-belarus-v-usloviyah-stanovleniya-soyuznogo-gosudarstva (data obrashcheniya: 08.03.2017).
4.
Voronina L.A., Ratner S.V. Nauchno-innovatsionnye seti v Rossii: opyt, problemy, perspektivy. M.: Infra-M, 2010. – 256 s.
5.
Glaz'ev S.Yu. O tselyakh, problemakh i merakh gosudarstvennoi politiki razvitiya i integratsii. Nauchnyi doklad na Nauchnom sovete po kompleksnym problemam evraziiskoi ekonomicheskoi integratsii, konkurentosposobnosti i ustoichivomu razvitiyu 29 yanvarya 2013 g., g. Moskva.
6.
Dorina, E. B. Mezhgosudarstvennaya integratsiya Rossii i Belarusi v innovatsionnoi sfere kak faktor povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti v usloviyakh globalizatsii / E. B. Dorina, O. P. Molchanova // Nauchnye trudy Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta: yubileinyi sbornik. Vyp. 6 / M-vo obrazovaniya Resp. Belarus', Belorusskii gos. ekon. un-t; [redkol.: V.N. Shimov (pred.) i dr.]. – Minsk: BGEU, 2013. S. 98-104.
7.
Zagidullina G.M, Sobolev E.A. Tekhnologicheskie uklady, ikh rol' i znachenie v razvitii innovatsionnoi ekonomiki Rossii // Izvestiya Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta. 2014. № 4(30). S. 348-356.
8.
Karatkevich A.G., Golovin Yu.A. Protsess integratsii Rossiiskoi Federatsii i Respubliki Belarus' v ramkakh Soyuznogo gosudarstva // Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N. A. Nekrasova. 2014. T. 20, № 6. S. 290-296.
9.
Konina N.Yu. Shestoi tekhnologicheskii uklad i menedzhment sovremennykh kompanii // Voprosy ekonomiki i prava. 2014. №3 S. 43-46
10.
Korbut E. S. Perspektivy razvitiya nauchno-innovatsionnogo prostranstva Soyuznogo gosudarstva / E. S. Korbut, N. I. Bogdan // NIRS BGEU – 2011: sbornik nauchnykh statei [studentov]. Vyp. 1 / M-vo obrazovaniya Resp. Belarus', UO "Belorusskii gos. ekon. un-t"; [redkol.: G.A. Korolenok (pred.) i dr.].-Minsk : RIVSh, 2011. S. 77-80.
11.
Korneev A.N. Razvitie innovatsionnogo sotrudnichestva Rossiiskoi Federatsii i Respubliki Belarus' v usloviyakh stanovleniya Soyuznogo gosudarstva: dis.... kand. ekonom. nauk: 08.00.14 [Mesto zashchity: FGBOU VPO «Gosudarstvennyi universitet upravleniya»]. Moskva, 2014. – 188 s.
12.
Mezhdunarodnaya ekonomicheskaya integratsiya: ucheb. posobie/pod red. N.N. Liventseva. – M.: Ekonomist'', 2006. – 403 s.
13.
Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye ekonomicheskie otnosheniya: uchebnik dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata / A. I. Pogorletskii [i dr.]; pod red. A. I. Pogorletskogo, S. F. Sutyrina. – M.: Izdatel'stvo Yurait, 2016. – 499 s.
14.
Myurdal' G. Mirovaya ekonomika: problemy i perspektivy. M.: Izdatel'stvo inostrannoi literatury, 1958. – 514 s.
15.
Peresmotr mezhdunarodnogo poryadka. Perevod s angliiskogo / Tinbergen Ya.; Pod obshch. red.: Ryvkin A.A.; Per.: Bonk I.A.; Predisl.: Gvishiani D.M.-M.: Progress, 1980. – 416 c.
16.
Repke V. Korennye voprosy khozyaistvennogo poryadka // Teoriya khozyaistvennogo poryadka: «Fraiburgskaya shkola» i nemetskii neoliberalizm. –M.: Ekonomika, 2002. – 465 s.
17.
Rossiisko-belorusskie otnosheniya v gorizonte do 2020 goda: itogi forsait-sessii / pod red. A. D. Saulina. – M.: OOO «Integratsiya: Obrazovanie i Nauka», 2017. – 96 s.
18.
Sokolov M.S. Problemy importozameshcheniya v usloviyakh krizisnykh proyavlenii v rossiiskoi ekonomike // Ustoichivoe razvitie rossiiskoi ekonomiki: materialy II Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (9-10 noyabrya 2015 g.) / sost. A.S. Voronov. – Moskva: FGBOU VO «REU im. G.V. Plekhanova», 2015. S. 89-94.
19.
Sokolov M.S. Rol' i perspektivy razvitiya regional'nykh investitsionnykh internet-portalov v ramkakh formirovaniya informatsionnogo prostranstva Soyuznogo gosudarstva // Obshchee informatsionnoe prostranstvo Soyuznogo gosudarstva (Zasedanie sorok pyatok, g.Minsk, 11-12 maya 2016 g.) / Pod red. S.G. Strel'chenko. – Mn.: Tsentr sistemnogo analiza i strategicheskikh issledovanii NAN Belarusi, 2016. S.157-163
20.
Shishkov Yu. V. Formirovanie evropeiskogo ekonomicheskogo prostranstva// Zaglyadyvaya v XXI vek ES i SNG / Otv. red. Yu. A. Borko M. 1998. – 479 s.
21.
Shishkov Yu.V. Otechestvennaya teoriya regional'noi integratsii: opyt proshlogo i vzglyad v budushchee // Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2006. № 4. S.54-63
22.
Ekonomika. Uchebnik: 3-e izd., pererab. i dop / Pod red. d-ra ekon. nauk, prof. Bulatova A.S. – M.: Yurist'', 2002. – 896 s.
23.
Archibugi, D., Iammarino, S. The globalization of technological innovation: definition and evidence // Review of International Political Economy.-2002, Vol. 9, Issue 1.
24.
Balassa, B. The Theory of Economic Integration. London: Georgi Alien & Unwin, 1962.
25.
Bellman, L., Webster, J., Jeanes, A. Knowledge Transfer and the Integration of Research, Policy and Practice // Journal of Research in Nursing. № 16. 2010. Pp. 254–270.
26.
Cooper, R. The Breaking of Nations. Order and Chaos in the Twenty'first Century. L., 2003.
27.
Dougherty, J., Pfaltzgraff, R.L. Contending Theories of International Relations. A Comprehensive Survey. N.Y., 1990.
28.
Haas, Ernst B. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces 1950–57., Ann Arbor, MI : UMI Books on Demand, 1996.
29.
Robson, P. The Economics of International Integration.L., 1987.
30.
Rosamond, B. Theories of European Integration. L., 2000.
31.
Wallace, W. The Dynamics of European Integration. L., 199
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website