по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > List of peer reviewers > Review procedure > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Legal information > Editorial Board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

В погоне за двумя зайцами поймай обоих сразу!
34 журнала издательства NOTA BENE входят одновременно и в ERIH PLUS, и в перечень изданий ВАК
При необходимости автору может быть предоставлена услуга срочной или сверхсрочной публикации!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
The Problem of Encouraging Savings in Terms of Discoveries Made in Behavioral and Cognitive Economy
Lebedev Sergei

PhD in Politics

Management Consultant, Private practice

117499, Russia, Moscow, Shvernika Street 5

sergei.lebedeff@gmail.com
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Dallakyan Arsen Karlenovich

PhD in Philosophy

consultant on consumer behavior www.arsendallan.com

115211, Russia, Moscow Region, Moscow, str. Borisovskie Prudy, 13

arsdallan@gmail.com

Abstract.

The subject of the research is the saving behavior of economic agents (in this case, population) under limited resources nd uncertain environment. The object of the research is the combination of cognitive and behavioral effects and phenomena that encourage or prevent from savings. These factors can be successfully used to encourage this type of economic behavior, moreover, some of them can be used directly by the government as well as financial institutions (retail banks, etc.). In their research the authors have used traditional economic research methods such as analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, and research abstraction. They have also used the method of case study (analysis of particular situations) and others. The researchers focuse on qualitative instead of quantitative analysis. The authors have offered a classification of discovered made in the fields of behavioral and cognitive economy, these discoveries facilitating or preventing from saving behavior of economic agents. The authors also analyze the experience of financial institutions aimed at encouraging saving behavior and developing relevant behavioral patterns (the habit to save money). The authors also offer to adapt a number of instruments that are used in modern marketing. In particular, they analyze savings gamification methods (based on the goal gradient hypothesis) and opportunities to apply the endowment effect through visualisation of the future value in account, etc.  

Keywords: goal-gradient hypothesis, endowment effect, gamification, loss aversion, hyperbolic discounting, bounded rationality, behavioral economics, conspicuous consumption, impulse saving(s), default options

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8647.2017.2.22669

Article was received:

12-04-2017


Review date:

13-04-2017


Publish date:

13-07-2017


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Corey A. DeAngelis & Patrick J. Wolf. “Whether to Approve an Education Savings Account Program in Texas: Preventing Crime Does Pay.” EDRE Working Paper 2016-20.
2.
Monitoring NIU VShE «Naselenie Rossii v 2016 godu: dokhody, raskhody i sotsial'noe samochuvstvie»-https://isp.hse.ru/data/2017/01/11/1115545507/09_%D0%9C%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B3_%D0%92%D0%A8%D0%AD_%D0%98%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%B8.pdf
3.
Keynes J. M. The general theory of employment, interest and money, London, Macmillan, 1973, p.96-97.
4.
Modigliani F., Ando A.K. Tests of the Life Cycle Hypothesis of Saving. Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Statistics 19 (May 1957), pp. 99-124.
5.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 18, 643-662.
6.
Dupas, Pascaline and Jonathan Robinson. 2013. "Why Don't the Poor Save More? Evidence from Health Savings Experiments." American Economic Review, 103(4): 1138-71.
7.
Read, Daniel, and Barbara van Leeuwen, 1998, “Predicting Hunger: The Effects of Appetite and Delay on Choice,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76.2 (Nov.), pp. 189-205
8.
Choi, James J., David Laibson, Brigitte Madrian, and Andrew Metrick. In press.“For Better or for Worse: Default Effects and 401(k) Savings Behavior.” In Perspectives on the Economics of Aging, edited by David A. Wise. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press (for NBER).
9.
Benartzi, Shlomo, and Richard Thaler. 2007. "Heuristics and Biases in Retirement Savings Behavior." Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3): 81-104.
10.
Samuelson, William, and Richard J. Zeckhauser. 1988. “Status Quo Bias in Decision Making.” J. Risk and Uncertainty 1 (March): 7–59.
11.
Benartzi, Shlomo, and Richard Thaler. 2007. "Heuristics and Biases in Retirement Savings Behavior." Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3): 81-104.
12.
Hull, Clark L. (1932). "The goal-gradient hypothesis and maze learning". Psychological Review. 39 (1): 25
13.
Kivetz, R., Urminsky, O., & Zheng, Y (2006). "The goal-gradient hypothesis resurrected: Purchase acceleration, illusionary goal progress, and customer retention". Journal of Marketing Research. 43 (1): 39–58
14.
Kerwin Kofi Charles & Erik Hurst & Nikolai Roussanov, 2009. "Conspicuous Consumption and Race," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 124(2), pages 425-467
15.
Dallakyan A.K. Upravlyai udovol'stviem. Tvorchestvo, povedencheskii marketing, korporatsii. M.: Eksmo, 2016. ISBN: 978-5-699-83768-7
16.
Kahneman, Daniel; Knetsch, Jack L.; Thaler, Richard H. (1990). «Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem». Journal of Political Economy 98 (6): 1325—1348
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website