К чему ведут основные тенденции в трансформации системы трудовых отношений страны: прекаризации или гуманизации труда?

Долженко Руслан Алексеевич

doi:10.7256/2409-8647.2017.1.20085


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial Board


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Theoretical and Applied Economics

Reference:

Dolzhenko R.A. — What the Main Trends in Transformation of Labor Relations System of the Country Lead to: the Precarization or Humanization of Labor? // Theoretical and Applied Economics. – 2017. – № 1. – P. 113 - 125. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8647.2017.1.20085 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=20085

What the Main Trends in Transformation of Labor Relations System of the Country Lead to: the Precarization or Humanization of Labor?

Dolzhenko Ruslan Alekseevich

Doctor of Economics

associate professor of the Department of Economics, Labor Socioloty and Personnel Management at Altai State University, associate professor of the Department of Strategic Marketing at Higher School of Economics

656049, Russia, Altai Region, Barnaul, pr. Sotsialisticheski, 68, of. 115

snurk17@gmail.com

DOI:

10.7256/2409-8647.2017.1.20085

Review date:

13-08-2016

Publish date:

15-04-2017

Abstract.

The subject of the research is the key transformations in the social life that influence the labor relations system. The object of the research is the labor relations system. The purpose of the research is to define key trends in transformation of labor relations system that affect labor actors. The author pays special attention to the factors that may worsen negative trends in the labor relations system such as the demographic crisis, extension of flexible technologies application scope, focus on the industry efficiency, globalization, etc. The author has used abstract logical, structural, functional and comparative analysis. The author has used results of foreign and Russian researches on the problems of developing labor relations system. The author has defined the key factors that influence the transformation of labor relations system and create even more contradictions in the process of developing labor relations system. The author also examines the nature and content of such processes as labor precarization and humanization, defines their particularities and conduct their comparison. At the end of the article the author concludes that the effect of instability is not limited to only employment sphere but affects different sides of social life. Taking into account the aforesaid main trends, the author predicts further growth of precarization of labor relations system.
Keywords: precarious employment, contradictions, labor humanization, labor precarization, employment, labour relations, globalization, demographic crisis, flexibility, optimization
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Nekhoda, E.V. Transformatsiya truda i sotsial'no-trudovykh otnoshenii v usloviyakh perekhoda k postindustrial'nomu obshchestvu // Vestnik Tomskogo gosuniversiteta.-2007.-№ 302.-S. 160-167
2.	Yanchenko, E. Chelovecheskie resursy v sotsial'no-trudovykh otnosheniyakh (vosproizvodstvennyi aspekt) // Vestnik VGU. Ser. Ekonomika i upravlenie.-2010.-№2.-S. 33-41
3.	Kalabina, E.G. Institutsional'nye izmeneniya v sfere vnutrifirmennykh trudovykh otnoshenii Izvestiya Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta.-2004.-№ 9.-S. 61-67
4.	Veredyuk, O.V. Determinanty zanyatosti v kontseptsii postindustrial'nogo obshchestva Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya Ekonomika.-2010.-№ 4.-S. 35-42
5.	Kapelyushnikov, R.I. Rossiiskii rynok truda: paradoksy postkrizisnogo razvitiya [Elektronnyi resurs]: preprint WP3/2014/04. – M.: Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2014. – (SeriyaWP3 «Problemy rynka truda»). – 41 s.
6.	Federal'naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoi statistiki: Trud i zanyatost' v Rossii. 2015: Stat.sb./Rosstat, M., 2015.-274 c. Elektronnyi resurs. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/doc_2015/trud15.pdf (data obrashcheniya 10.08.2016)
7.	Sotsial'naya politika: dolgosrochnye tendentsii i izmeneniya poslednikh let. Kratkaya versiya doklada [Tekst]: dokl. k XVI Apr. mezhdunar. nauch. konf. po problemam razvitiya ekonomiki i obshchestva, Moskva, 7–10 apr. 2015 g. / otv. red. Ya. I. Kuz'minov, L. N. Ovcharova, L. I. Yakobson; Nats. issled. un-t «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki». — M.: Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2015. — 51 s.
8.	Kapelyushnikov, R.I. Neformal'naya zanyatost' v Rossii: chto govoryat al'ternativnye opredeleniya? – M.: Izd. dom «Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki».-2012. – 84 s.
9.	Gerasimova, I.V. Vliyanie migratsionnykh protsessov na regulirovanie sotsial'no-trudovykh otnoshenii v regione: dissertatsiya ... kandidata ekonomicheskikh nauk: 08.00.05 / Gerasimova Irina Vladimirovna; [Mesto zashchity: Gos. un-t upr.].-Moskva, 2013.-223 s.
10.	Bauman, Z. Vozvyshenie i upadok truda / Z. Bauman // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. – 2004.-№5. – S.81
11.	Howell, C. The Dilemmas of Post-Fordism: Socialists, Flexibility, and labor Market Deregulation in France. Politics and Society,-1992,-Vol. 20.-№1.-P. 71-100
12.	Tsygankova, I.V. Gibkie modeli nepolnogo rabochego vremeni i smennoi raboty // Chelovek i trud. – 2008. – №. 9. – C.62-65
13.	Zhukov, A.L. Audit kak stimulyator truda i motivatsii personala // Trud i sotsial'nye otnosheniya.-2009.-№11.-S. 38−44
14.	Varshavskaya, E.Ya. Gibkost' zanyatosti: zarubezhnyi opyt i rossiiskaya praktika / E. Ya. Varshavskaya. – Kemerovo. 2009. – 255 s.
15.	Kapitsa, P.L. Eksperiment. Teoriya. Praktika, M.: «Nauka». 1987.-S.196-197
16.	Apen'ko, S.N., Shavrovskaya, M.N. Klientoorientirovannost' personala v kontseptsii marketinga otnoshenii // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta.-2010.-№2.-C. 50-56
17.	Kotlyarov, I.D. Neustoichivye formy zanyatosti v postindustrial'noi ekonomike // Formuvannya rinkovoї ekonomiki. Zbirnik naukovikh prats'. – 2014.-№ 31. – S. 407-416
18.	Hotopp, U., Teleworking in the UK / Labour Market Trends, June 2002, p. 311-314
19.	Davis, D., & Polonko, K. Telework in the United States: Telework America survey 2001. Scottsdale, AZ: International Telework Association and Council
20.	Skavitin, A.V. Telerabota v mirovoi ekonomicheskoi praktike / A. V. Skavitin // Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom. — 2004. — № : 6. — S.108-109
21.	Shchuchkin, G. V. Modernizatsiya sotsial'no-trudovykh otnoshenii v usloviyakh innovatsionnogo razvitiya ekonomiki: dis... kand. ekon. nauk: 08.00.05 / G. V. Shchuchkin, Ros. ekon. un-t im. G. V. Plekhanova. – M., 2013. – 235 s.
22.	Antipina, O.N. Nastoyashchee bogatstvo novoi ekonomiki // SShA. Kanada. Ekonomika-politika-kul'tura.-2008.-№12. – S.63-76
23.	Sankova, L.V. Prekarizatsiya zanyatosti v sovremennoi ekonomike: sistem-nyi risk ili "osobaya" forma fleksibilizatsii / Sankova L.V. // Uroven' zhiz-ni naseleniya regionov Rossii.-2014.-№ 4.-S. 44 – 53
24.	Lee, C. K., Kofman, Y. The Politics of Precarity: Views Beyon the United States // Work and Occupations, 2012, 39(4), P. 388–408

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.