Статья 'Пушкин и постмодернизм: о фильме В. Мирзоева «Борис Годунов»' - журнал 'Культура и искусство' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Culture and Art
Reference:

Rudnev, V. P. Pushkin and Post-Modernism: Regarding V. Mirzoev’s Movie ‘Boris Godunov’

Abstract: V. Mirzoev’s new movie ‘Boris Godunov’ is being analyzed by the means of the psycho-motive analysis allowing to fi nd the profound inter-textual motives both in a movie and the same-name tragedy written by A. S. Pushkin. According to the author of the article, the movie and the tragedy are in one postmodernistic time and space where there is neither past nor future. Pushkin infl uences Mirzoev just as Mirzoev infl uences Pushkin. The author’s analysis shows hidden identifi cations between heroes and ‘their prototypes in history’ in ‘the future’ of the post-modernistic discourse. However, it is admitted that a true achievement made by Mirzoev’s movie is an overcoming of post-modernism in search of new cinematographic esthetics in the 21st century.


Keywords:

cultural studies, V. Mirzoev, A. S. Pushkin, motives, identifi cation, Boris Godunov, reality, inter text, psycho semiotics, cinema.


This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register

References
1. Averintsev S. S. K istolkovaniyu simvoliki mifa ob Edipe // Antichnost' i sovremennost'. M., 1972.
2. Bart R. Nulevaya stepen' pis'ma // Semiotika / Pod red. Yu. S. Stepanova. M.,1983.
3. Bakhtin M. M. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo. M., 1963.
4. Bakhtin M. M. Fransuya Rable i narodnaya smekhovaya kul'tura serdnevekov'ya i Renessansa. M., 1965.
5. Gasparov B. M. Literaturnye leytmotivy. M.,1995.
6. Golosovker Ya. E. Logika mifa. M., 1987.
7. Delez Zh., Gvattari F. AntiEdip: Kapitalizm i shizofreniya. M., 2007.
8. Derrida Zh. O grammatologii. M., 2000.
9. Ivanov Vyach. Vs. Ob inversii dvoichnykh protivopostavleniy v poetike M. M. Bakhtina // Trudy po znakovym sistemam. T. 6. Tartu, 1973.
10. Lakan Zh. Seminary. T. 2. M., 2000.
11. Nyurnberg G. Printsipy psikhoanaliza. M., 1999.
12. Pushkin A. S. Poln. sobr. soch.: V 10 t. T. 6. M., 1959.
13. Rank O. Travma rozhdeniya. M., 2004.
14. Rudnev V. P. Proch' ot real'nosti. M., 2000.
15. Rudnev V. Filosofiya yazyka i semiotika bezumiya: Izbrannoe. M., 2007.
16. Rudnev V. P. Polifonicheskoe telo. M., 2010.
17. Rudnev V. Vvedenie v shizoreal'nost' M., 2011.
18. Saletsl R. (Iz)vrashcheniya lyubvi i nenavisti. M., 1999.
19. Svetoniy Gay Trankvill. Zhizn' dvenadtsati tsezarey. M., 1991.
20. Skrynnikov R. G. Boris Godunov. M., 1978.
21. Tart Ch. Probuzhdenie. M., 1997.
22. Folkner U. Shum i yarost'. M., 1998.
23. Freyd 3. Vvedenie v psikhoanaliz. Lektsii. M., 1989
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.