|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Culture and Art
Reference:
Shapinskaia E.N., Glazkova T.V.
Love and Family in Russian Cultural Discourse: from Artistic Representation to Philosophic Reflexion
// Culture and Art.
2016. № 5.
P. 575-587.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0625.2016.5.17622 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=17622
Любовь и семья в дискурсах русской культуры: от художественных репрезентаций к философской рефлексии
Shapinskaia Ekaterina Nikolaevna
Doctor of Philosophy
deputy head of the Expert-Analytical Center for the Development of Education Systems in the Sphere of Culture at Institute of Cultural and Natural Heritage of Dmitry Likhachov
107207, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Ural'skaya, 6, of. Uralskaya
|
reenash@mail.ru
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
Glazkova Tat'yana Vatslavovna
PhD in Philology
associate professor of the Russian Language Department at Gnessin State Musical College
115093, Russia, Moscow Region, Moscow, str. the 1st Pavlovskii per., 5, bld. 49
|
|
glaztatyana@yandex.ru
|
|
 |
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0625.2016.5.17622
Received:
17-01-2016
Published:
28-10-2016
Abstract:
The subject of the present reserach is the problem of love and marriage as interrelated phenomena as well as their interpretation in Russian artistic texts and philosophical discourses. The rationale for choosing this topic is the deconstruction of traditional famly values in today's sociocutural situation when new forms of legitimized family relations which used to be rejected by society appear and the value of love as the basis of family is in question taking into account the processes of culture commercialization and individual atomization. The researchers have used the method of textual analysis and discourse-analysis to analyze representative texts from Russian fiction and philosophy. The authors have also used the diachronic method to research cultural phenomena. The scientific novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the authors study modern contradictions in interpersonal relations that possess the features of post-modernist culture and society from the point of view of similar crises in the Russian culture of the 19th century that were reflected in literary and philosophical discourses. The conclusion is made that inspite of cultural changes many of the aspects of love-family relations have universal meaning and are a part of human being's existence. Thus, the authors outline universal anthropological phenomena, love and family, that remain stable despite changes in cultural paradigms.
Keywords:
philosophy, literature, representation, power, regulation, love, discourse, interpersonal relations, family, culture
References
1. Rend A. Romanticheskii manifest. M.: Al'pina Pablisher, 2011. 199 s.
2. Pushkareva N.L. Seksual'naya etika v chastnoi zhizni drevnikh rusov i moskovitov // Seks i erotika v russkoi traditsionnoi kul'ture. M.: Ladomir, 1996. S. 51–103.
3. Shapinskaya E.N. Vlastnye strategii i diskurs lyubvi v romane Goncharova «Obryv» // Voprosy sotsiologii. 1996. № 7. S. 123–151. URL: http://sociologos.net/shapinskaya-vlastnie-strategii (data obrashcheniya 12.01.2015 g.)
4. Shestakov V.P. Eros i kul'tura. Filosofiya lyubvi i evropeiskoe iskusstvo. M.: Terra-Knizhnyi klub, Izdatel'stvo «Respublika», 1999. 464 c.
5. Kon I.S. Istoricheskie sud'by russkogo erosa // Seks i erotika v russkoi traditsionnoi kul'ture. M.: Ladomir, 1996. S. 5–30.
6. Giddens E. Transformatsiya intimnosti. Seksual'nost', lyubov' i erotizm v sovremennykh obshchestvakh. M.: Piter, 2014. 208 s.
7. Berdyaev N.A. Filosofiya svobody. Smysl tvorchestva. M.: Pravda, 1998. 608 s.
8. Luhmann N. Love as Passion. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1986. P. 21.
9. Rozanov V.V. Tsel' chelovecheskoi zhizni // Rozanov V.V. Metafizika khristianstva. M.: AST: Folio, 2001. 536 s.
10. Goncharov I.A. Obryv. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1986. 448 s.
11. Rassel B. Istorii zapadnoi filosofii: V 3-kh kn. Kn. 3. Novosibirsk: Sib. univ. izd-vo; Izd-vo Novosib. un-ta, 2001. 992 s.
12. Pekelis M. Dargomyzhskii i ego okruzhenie. URL: http://ale07.ru/music/notes/song/muzlit/dargomyjskyi.htm (data obrashcheniya 13.01.2016 g.)
13. Nitsshe F. Esse Nomo // Sochineniya: V 2-kh t. T. 2. M.: «Mysl'», 1990. S. 693–755.
14. Nitsshe F. Veselaya nauka // Sochineniya: V 2-kh t. T. 1. M.: «Mysl'», 1990. S. 491–719.
15. Gilbert P. Human Relations. Oxford, Ukand Cambridge, USA, Blackwell, 1991.
16. Rozanov V.V. Metafizika khristianstva. M.: AST; Khar'kov: Folio, 2001. 536 s.
17. Dostoevskii F.M. Zapisnaya knizhka 1863–1864 gg. // Dostoevskii F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: V 30-ti t. L.: Nauka, 1972-1990. T. 20. L., 1980. 432 c.
18. Bocharov S.G. Leont'ev i Dostoevskii. Stat'ya pervaya. Spor o lyubvi i garmonii // Dostoevskii. Materialy i issledovaniya. T. 12. SPb.: Nauka, 1996. S. 162–189.
19. Dostoevskii F.M. «Dnevnik pisatelya» za 1877 god (yanvar'-avgust) // Dostoevskii F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: V 30-ti t. L.: Nauka, 1972-1990. T. 25. 254 c.
20. Leont'ev K.N. Sobranie sochinenii: V 9-ti t. M.: Tipografiya V.M. Sablina; SPb.: Russkoe knizhnoe tovarishchestvo «Deyatel'», 1912–1914. T. VIII. 357 s.
21. Dostoevskii F.M. Brat'ya Karamazovy // Dostoevskii F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: V 30-ti t. L.: Nauka, 1972-1990. T. 14 (ch. 1–10). 512 s.
22. Dostoevskii Brat'ya Karamazovy // Dostoevskii F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: V 30-ti t. L.: Nauka, 1972-1990. T. 15 (ch. 11–12). 624 s.
23. Dostoevskii F.M. «Dnevnik pisatelya» za 1876 god (mai-oktyabr') // Dostoevskii F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: V 30-ti t. L.: Nauka, 1972–1990. T. 423 s.
24. Fudel' S.I. Nasledstvo Dostoevskogo. M.: Russkii put', 1998. 288 s.
25. Lermontov M.Yu. Sobr. soch.: V 4-kh t. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1976. T. IV. 542 s.
26. Semenov A.N. Russkaya literatura v voprosakh i zadaniyakh. XII–XIX vek. M.: Gumanitarnyi izdatel'skii tsentr Vlados, 2000. 302 s.
27. Protoierei Sergii Makhonin. Opyt prepodavaniya «Osnov Pravoslavnoi kul'tury» // Moskovskie eparkhial'nye vedomosti. 2004. № 1–2. S. 152.
28. Glazkova T.V. Sluchainoe semeistvo kak fenomen kul'tury. M.: Russkii raritet, 2010. 256 s.
29. Berdyaev N.A. Razmyshleniya ob erose // Eros i lichnost'. M.: Prometei, 1989. 224 c.
30. Berdyaev N.A. Smysl tvorchestva. M.: AST; Khar'kov: Folio, 2002. 158 s.
31. Rozanov V.V. V mire neyasnogo i nereshennogo. M.: Respublika, 1995. 463 s.
32. L.A. Gritsai Gumanisticheskaya model' semeinogo vospitaniya v pedagogicheskom nasledii N.N. Karintseva, I.O. Fesenko i P.P. Blonskogo // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. 2012. № 2. C. 34-45.
33. A.L. Karpenko Polorolevaya identifikatsiya sovremennoi zhenshchiny // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. 2012. № 9. C. 97-103.
34. A.A. Chuprina Filosofskii kontekst osmysleniya sem'i kak indikatora
kul'turnogo razvitiya obshchestva // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013. № 5. C. 583-593. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.05.2.
35. E.A. Beznoshchenko Tsennost' sem'i v sovremennom zapadnoevropeiskom obshchestve: sotsial'no-filosofskii diskurs // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2010. № 9. C. 51-55.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
