Статья 'Познание мифа и мифы познания (к поэтике мифотворчества). ' - журнал 'Культура и искусство' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Culture and Art
Reference:

Познание мифа и мифы познания (к поэтике мифотворчества).

Spektor David Mikhailovich

PhD in Architecture

Docent, the department of Architecture, Moscow State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering

109451 Russia, Moscow, 3-ya Kabelnaya 1

daspektor@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0625.2015.3.14538

Received:

22-02-2015


Published:

24-04-2015


Abstract: Interpretations of the myth, at all variety, are based rather narrow circle of anthropological ideas among which the model of "homo sapiens" predominates. The understanding of the myth is connected with it directly (rationalistic interpretation) or indirectly (the models based on structuralist and semantic approaches). In this article the treatment of the myth caused by the real circumstances of its origin and primary functions connected first of all not with a rational exposition of reality, but with initiation of the certain instance representing collective spirit is planned. The method of research is caused by criticism of widespread mythological concepts; in its course their bias and the apriorizm caused by the prevailing positivistic position is established. In article is shown that the dawn of human history is marked not by gradual accumulation of an intellectual resource, but as explosive refusal of a support on schemes and algorithms of action, the refusal which demanded absolutely specific providing, one of which elements the myth acts. In the substantial relation the myth inherits to the following functions of cultural formation: a) deduction of pathos and to its transfer to the vital world in the sounding word; b) initiations of readiness for collective and spontaneous reaction "suddenly" (to ecstatic experience), c) to rooting as a part of mentality of the instance of involvement reacting to an environment as a being (whole, the world) the certain typicalness subordinating the shown.


Keywords:

genesis, myth, the shared motivation, the transcendental esthetics, spontaneous reactions, Logical and a-logical, ritual, sacrifice, transfer, glorification

References
1. Vundt V. Mif i religiya. SPb., 1912.
2. Weidkuhn P. Aggressivität und Normativitat//Anthropos. 1968—1969. Vol. 63/64. r. 361-394.
3. Pershits A. I. Problemy normativnoi etnografii // Issledovaniya po obshchei etnografii. M., 1979.
4. Agranovich S.Z., Stefanskii E.E. Mif v slove: prodolzhenie zhizni (Ocherki po mifolingvistike). – Samara., 2003. – 168 s.
5. A.I. Pyatigorskii. «Mifologicheskie razmyshleniya. Lektsii po fenomenologii mifa»: Yazyki russkoi kul'tury; Moskva; 1996 ISBN 5-7859-0002-5.
6. Losev A. F. Mifologiya // Filosofskaya entsiklopediya. M.: Sov. entsiklopediya, 1964. T. 3.
7. Losev A. F. Antichnyi Kosmos i sovremennaya nauka. M., 1927.
8. Shelling F. V. I. Vvedenie v filosofiyu mifologii // Shelling F. V. I. Sochineniya. M.: Mysl', 1989. T. 2.
9. Losev A. F. Dialektika mifa // Losev A. F. Iz rannikh proizvedenii. M.: Pravda, 1990.
10. Ugrinovich D. M. Iskusstvo i religiya. M.: Politizdat, 1982.
11. Freidenberg O. M. Mif i literatura drevnosti. M.: Nauka. GRVL, 1978.
12. Kessidi F. X. Ot mifa k logosu (Stanovlenie grecheskoi filosofii). M.: Mysl', 1972.
13. Levi-Bryul' L. Pervobytnoe myshlenie. M., 1930.
14. Leont'ev A. N. Problemy razvitiya psikhiki. – M. 1981.
15. Spektor D. M. Vlast' vremeni. – M.; 2009.
16. Toporov V.N. O rituale. Vvedenie v problematiku. // Arkhaicheskii ritual v fol'klornykh i literaturnykh pamyatnikakh. M., 1988. S.24.
17. Florenskii P. A. Obshchechelovecheskie korni idealizma. Sergiev Posad: Tip. Sv.-Tr. Sergiev. Lavry, 1909. S. 22-23.
18. Freidenberg O. M. Poetika syuzheta i zhanra. L.: Goslitizdat, 1936. S. 104.
19. Lotman Yu. M., Uspenskii B. A. Mif-imya-literatura // Trudy po znakovym sistemam. Tartu: Izd. TGU, 1973. T. 6. S. 283.
20. Spektor D.M. Istoricheskie korni dramaticheskoi poetiki. // NB: Filologicheskie issledovaniya. — 2013.-№ 4.
21. Kessidi F. X. Ot mifa k logosu (Stanovlenie grecheskoi filosofii). M.: Mysl', 1972.
22. Vygotskii L. S. Sobranie sochinenii. M.: Pedagogika, 1982-1984. T. 2.
23. Levi-Bryul' L. Pervobytnoe myshlenie. M., 1930.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.