Статья 'От перформанса в его актуальных протестных формах к культурному прецеденту. Статья первая' - журнал 'Культура и искусство' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Culture and Art
Reference:

От перформанса в его актуальных протестных формах к культурному прецеденту. Статья первая

Khrenov Nikolay Andreevich

Doctor of Philosophy

chief researcher of the Department of Media and Popular Arts at State Institute of Art Studies of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation, Professor of Aesthetics of the Department of History and Theory of Culture at S. A. Gerasimov All - Russian State University of Cinematography

121108, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Pivchenkova, 5

nihrenov@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0625.2015.2.14144

Received:

07-01-2015


Published:

25-02-2015


Abstract: A creative personality as a public figure is the topic of this article. The said personality can express itself in different forms. In this particular case among all possible forms the author is emphasizing and considering the one where the protest is coming to the fore. Such forms of the contemporary art as performance and happening, and most of all those pieces of art which are laying a special emphasize on the protest, are appearing as a concrete expression of this form. Radicalism appearing in these art forms aids detecting aspects of artist’s creativeness which are promoting transformation of any creative person to a public figure. Pertain of performance and happening to art it is not obvious. These art forms are perceived as marginal one and are exclusive of the conventional art system. More often than not their radical protest is liable to prosecution. However legal evaluation does not facilitate but complicate esthetic evaluating. In order to overcome the doubtful status of these forms, it is necessary to consider them as cultural phenomenon with past precedents. “Yurodstvo” (idiotic action) of the times of Ancient Rus is their immediate predecessor. This is the first attempt to analyze the creative personality at such culturological angel. Based on researches of A. van Gennep and W. Turner, the author is revealing a latent character in creative person’s activity, which is known as liminality, in other words, a necessity and ability to express protest which is not only a protest against the power, but as protest against the society stagnating in conformism. In pre-industrial societies any bearer of liminality, i.e. a wacky, was a sacred person, who should not suffer persecution of authorities. In secularized societies the artist and images of his/her heroes are bearers of liminality. And happenings and performances are the contemporary forms for expressing the spirit of liminality.


Keywords:

creative personality, performance, happening, public figure, yurodstvo, Avant-garde, liminality, anti-behaviour, sacral, secularity

References
1. Ivanov R. Istoriya russkoi obshchestvennoi mysli. P., 1918;
2. Gaidenko P. Vladimir Solov'ev i filosofiya Serebryanogo veka. M., 2001;
3. Bakhtin M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki.M., 1975;
4. Leksikon nonklassiki. Khudozhestvenno-esteticheskaya kul'tura KhKh veka. Pod obshchei redaktsiei V. V. Bychkova. M., 2003;
5. Goldberg R. Iskusstvo performansa. Ot futurizma do nashikh dnei. M., 2014;
6. Likhachev D., Panchenko A., Ponyrko N. Smekh v drevnei Rusi.L., 1984;
7. Fletcher D. O gosudarstve russkom. SPb., 1911;
8. Burkkhardt Ya. Kul'tura Italii v epokhu Vozrozhdeniya. M., 1996;
9. Popper K. Otkrytoe obshchestvo i ego vragi., t. 1. Chary Platona. M., 1992;
10. Fuko M. Istoriya bezumiya v klassicheskuyu epokhu. SPb., 1997;
11. Klyuchevskii V. Pis'ma. Dnevniki. Aforizmy i mysli ob istorii. M., 1968;
12. Bykov D. Boris Pasternak. M., 2008;
13. Florovskii G. Puti russkogo bogosloviya. Kiev. 1991;
14. Epshtein M. Iskusstvo avangarda i religioznoe soznanie. Novyi mir. 1989., № 12
15. Petrov V.O. Aktsionizm Dzhona Keidzha: osnovnye formy i spetsifika ikh voploshcheniya // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2014. - 4. - C. 444 - 456. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2014.4.12721.
16. Petrov V.O. Novatorskie obrazy iskusstva KhKh veka: v rakurse epatazha // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2013. - 5. - C. 562 - 569. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2013.5.9151.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.