Статья 'Публичность в ее традиционных и виртуальных формах как феномен культуры. Статья вторая' - журнал 'Культура и искусство' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Culture and Art
Reference:

Публичность в ее традиционных и виртуальных формах как феномен культуры. Статья вторая

Khrenov Nikolay Andreevich

Doctor of Philosophy

chief researcher of the Department of Media and Popular Arts at State Institute of Art Studies of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation, Professor of Aesthetics of the Department of History and Theory of Culture at S. A. Gerasimov All - Russian State University of Cinematography

121108, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Pivchenkova, 5

nihrenov@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0625.2015.5.13870

Received:

01-12-2014


Published:

13-10-2015


Abstract: The subject of the present research is the nature and functions of publicity as a cultural phenomenon. Among numerous forms of historical research, the most famous ones are history of society, history of state, history of culture, history of communication and history of art. However, the development of history of art goes in parallel with history of public, i.e. the environment where art functions. The environment either contributes to the development of an intensive art life or, on the contrary, puts brakes on the development of art. Moreover, history of public is also the history of a more general phemonenon - publicity that is manifested not only in art but also in rituals, fairies, festive, sport, entertaining and theatrical forms. What is publicity considering that it is an intermediate element between history of art and history of society? What forms of publicity have been known throughout history? What functions has publicity performed in history? These are the questions the author covers in his article and chooses as the subject of his research. Taking into account that history of publicity is a form of history of society, the author has used the sociological approach to studying features of publicity because the sociological approach completes the historical approach. Sociology dictates a differentiated approach to society and, therefore, to publicity. In his article Khrenov describes the features of publicity attributed to pre-industrial, industrial and post-industrial societies. The author also focuses on the transfer of publicity forms that are typical for the industrial society to the publicity forms that are representative for post-industrial societies that create virtual forms of publicity based on developed technologies. Khrenov also pays attention to the contribution of so-called 'the third class' to the development of new forms of publicity. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the processes ongoing in the cities of the Modern and Contemporary Periods, in particular, those that are typical for new forms of publicity, have consequences for not only the society but also culture in general. Publicity is also a sphere of creative culture, thus the author has also applied the cultural approach to studying publicity as the subject of the present research. Publicity is the phenomenon that is related to both culture and society. To prove it, the author appeals to the theatrical life of the XVIIIth century when future virtual forms of publicity associated with television and Internet started to appear. 


Keywords:

virtual publicity, festivity, emotional contact, emotional deficiency, theatricism, duality, communication, publicity, industrial society, public

References
1. Abramyan L. Pervobytnyi prazdnik i mifologiya. Erevan., 1983;
2. Bernshtam T. Budni i prazdniki: povedenie vzroslykh v russkoi krest'yanskoi srede (KhIKh-nachalo KhKh v. ) // Etnicheskie stereotipy povedeniya. L., 1985;
3. Bernshtam T. Molodezh' v obryadovoi zhizni russkoi obshchiny KhIKh-nachala KhKh v., L., 1988;
4. Biblioteka literatury Drevnei Rusi., t. 1. KhI-KhII veka. SPb., 1997;
5. Bulgakov S. Dva grada. Issledovanie o prirode obshchestvennykh idealov. SPb., 1997;
6. Veblen T. Teoriya prazdnogo klassa. M., 1984;
7. Golubinskii E. istoriya russkoi tserkvi., t. 1. Period pervyi, kievskii ili domongol'skii. 1 pol. toma. M., 1901;
8. Debor G. Obshchestvo spektaklya. M., 2011;
9. Dzhekobs D. Zakat Ameriki. Vperedi Srednevekov'e. M., 2007;
10. Dzhekobs D. Smert' i zhizn' bol'shikh amerikanskikh gorodov. M., 2011;
11. Dodonov B. Emotsiya kak tsennost'. M., 1978;
12. Zedl'mair Kh. Utrata serediny. M., 2008;
13. Zolotarev A. Rodovoi stroi i pervobytnaya mifologiya. M., 1964;
14. Zombart V. Sovremennyi kapitalizm. t. 2., M., 1904;
15. Istoriya chteniya v zapadnom mire ot antichnosti do nashikh dnei. M., 2008;
16. Kanneti E. Massa i vlast'. M., 1997;
17. Karamzin N. Pis'ma russkogo puteshestvennika. L., 1984;
18. Levi-Stros L. Strukturnaya antropologiya. M., 1983;
19. Lebon G. Psikhologiya narodov i mass. SPb., 1995;
20. Lotman Yu. Teatr i teatral'nost' v stroe kul'tury nachala KhIKh veka // Lotman Yu. Izbrannye raboty v 3 t., t. 1. Stat'i po semiotike i tipologii kul'tury. Tallinn., 1992;
21. Lotman Yu. Poetika bytovogo povedeniya v russkoi kul'ture KhUIII veka // Lotman Yu. Izbrannye stat'i v 3 t., t. 1. Stat'i po semiotike i tipologii kul'tury. Tallinn., 1992;
22. Luman N. Real'nost' massmedia. M., 2005;
23. Moskovskoe kupecheskoe sobranie. Istoricheskii ocherk. M., 1914;
24. Mel'nikov A. Ocherki bytovoi istorii Nizhegorodskoi yarmarki. 1917-1917. Nizhnii Novgorod., 1917;
25. Nitsshe F. Volya k vlasti. Opyt pereotsenki vsekh tsennostei. M., 2005;
26. Nitsshe F. Sochineniya v 2 t., t. 2., M., 1990;
27. Obukhovskii K. Psikhologiya vlechenii cheloveka. M., 1972;
28. Pisemskii A. Sobranie sochinenii v 9 t., t. 7. M., 1957;
29. Platon. Sochineniya v 3 t., t. 2., M., 1970;
30. Po E. Polnoe sobranie rasskazov. M., 1970;
31. Redklif-Braun A. Struktura i funktsiya v primitivnom obshchestve. M., 2001;
32. Russo Zh.-Zh. Pis'mo d, Alamberu o zrelishchakh // Russo Zh.-Zh. Izbrannye sochineniya v 3 t., t. 1., M., 1961;
33. Sennet R. Padenie publichnogo cheloveka. M., 2002;
34. Sigele S. Prestupnaya tolpa. M., 1998;
35. Snegirev A. Russkie v svoikh poslovitsakh. M., 1834;
36. Tard G. Zakony podrazhaniya. M., 2011;
37. Tennis F. Obshchnost' i obshchestvo. SPb., 2002;
38. Toffler E. Tret'ya volna. M., 1999;
39. Fuks E. Illyustrirovannaya istoriya nravov. Galantnyi vek. M., 1994;
40. Fuks E. Illyustrirovannaya istoriya nravov. Burzhuaznyi vek. M., 1964;
41. Khrenov N. Chelovek igrayushchii v russkoi kul'ture. SPb., 2005;
42. Khrenov N. Predely eskalatsii kommunikativnykh tekhnologii: nostal'giya po ploshchadi // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. 2014., № 1-2;
43. Khrenov n. Zrelishcha v epokhu vosstaniya mass. M., 2006;
44. Chaadaev P. Stat'i i pis'ma. M., 1989;
45. Charskii V. Khudozhestvennyi teatr // Krizis teatra. 1908;
46. Shchepanskaya T. Molodezhnye soobshchestva // Sovremennyi gorodskoi fol'klor. M., 2003
47. D. G. Trunov Performans kak artterapevticheskaya tekhnika. // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2010. - 11. - C. 63 - 69.
48. Dunyaeva M.M. Rol' i znachenie sredstv massovoi kommunikatsii v sovremennykh politicheskikh protsessakh // Politika i Obshchestvo. - 2014. - 10. - C. 1252 - 1257. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.10.13267.
49. Dunyaeva M.M. K voprosu ob osobennostyakh informatsionnogo protivostoyaniya Rossii i Gruzii // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 11. - C. 1686 - 1690. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.11.13266.
50. Yu.V. Lobanova Sotsiokul'turnye posledstviya globalizatsii
i problema dialoga kul'tur. // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2011. - 4. - C. 130 - 136.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.