—тать€ '–аздвига€ или сужа€ границы Ђдозволенногої.   проблеме определени€ пон€ти€ Ђрелигиозное искусствої ' - журнал '„еловек и культура' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Man and Culture
Reference:

Expanding or limiting the boundaries of the УallowableФ: to the problem of outlining the concept of Уreligious artФ

Golovushkin Dmitrii Aleksandrovich

Docent, the department of History of Religion and Theology,†Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia

191186, Russia, Sankt-Peterburg, g. Saint Petersburg, Naberezhnaya reki Moiki, 48, korpus 20 (Fakul'tet sotsial'nykh nauk), kab. 214

golovushkinda@mail.ru
ƒругие публикации этого автора
 

 
Gumarova Irina Ravkatovna

Artist, Curator of Educational Project "Art is Here"

191024, Russia, g. Saint Petersburg, ul. Degtyarnaya, 5-7, of. -

iris-ruthenica@yandex.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8744.2020.5.31638

Review date:

07-12-2019


Publish date:

26-10-2020


Abstract: Religious art is one of the most complex and controversial phenomena in the history of art. The attempts to conceptualize this phenomenon are relatively recent, and are carried out mostly in the context of the existence of confessional, ecclesiastical/nonecclesiastical, cult/atheistic art. Therefore, religious art within the Russian humanities traditionally receives ambivalent interpretation. In a narrow sense, religious art implies a combination of artworks with dogmatic, doctrinal, and liturgical meaning. In a broad sense, religious art represents a set artworks that reveal religious themes from ideological and figurative perspectives, reflect religious worldview, faith and experience, but do not carry sacred statues, nor intended for reverence, worship, liturgical practices.  The author concludes that neither definition describes the distinctness and novelty of the religious art. The appropriate interpretation describes religious art as d both, ecclesiastical/non-ecclesiastical and cult / atheistic art. This leads to a terminological confusion, and doubts the need for introducing the concept of “religious art” and the phenomenon itself. The key towards understanding this phenomenon and a new definition of the concept of “religious art” can be their context – the European and Russian secularization. It is not coincidental that the first was addressed, and the second was deliberately formulated at the turn of the XIX – XX centuries. Religious art mainstreams during the historical periods when the boundaries of secularization/religion become flexible, initiating struggle for them.


Keywords: desecularization, secularization, non-cult art, cult art, out-of-church art, church art, confessional art, Religious art, evolution of religion, contextual analysis
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Bychkov V.V. Russkaya teurgicheskaya estetika. Ц M.: Ladomir, 2007. Ц743 s.
2.
Glagolev V.S. Khristianskoe iskusstvo // Religiovedenie. Entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. Ц M.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2006. Ц S. 1158 Ц 1159.
3.
Davydov I.P. Religioznoe iskusstvo // Religiovedenie. Entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. Ц M.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2006. Ц S. 867 Ц 868.
4.
Istoriya religii: uchebnik dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata / V.Yu. Lebedev, A.M. Prilutskii, A.Yu. Grigorenko; pod red. V.Yu. Lebedeva, A.M. Prilutskogo. Ц M.: Izdatel'stvo Yurait, 2017. Ц 456 s.
5.
Novikova M.M. Problema teurgicheskogo tvorchestva v kontseptsiyakh kul'tury myslitelei serebryanogo veka: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. kul'turologicheskikh nauk. Ц Nizhnevartovsk, 1998. Ц 23 s.
6.
Osnovy religiovedeniya Ucheb. / Yu.F. Borunkov, I.N. Yablokov, K.I. Nikonov i dr.; Pod red. I.N. Yablokova. Ц M.: Vyssh. shk., 2001. Ц 480 s.
7.
Osnovy sotsial'noi kontseptsii Russkoi pravoslavnoi tserkvi // Azbuka very. Pravoslavnaya biblioteka [Elektronnyi resurs]. Ц Rezhim dostupa: https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/dokumenty/osnovy-sotsialnoj-kontseptsii-russkoj-pravoslavnoj-tserkvi/ (Data obrashcheniya: 22.11.2019).
8.
Raevskaya N.Yu. Svyashchennye izobrazheniya i izobrazheniya svyashchennogo v khristianskoi traditsii. Ц SPb.: SATIS'''', 2011. Ц 270 s.
9.
Religiovedenie: Uchebnoe posobie i Uchebnyi slovar'-minimum po religiovedeniyu / I.N. Yablokov. Ц M.: Gardariki, 2000. Ц 536 s.
10.
Tillikh P. Izbrannoe: Teologiya kul'tury. Per. s angl. Ц M.: Yurist, 1995. Ц 479 s.
11.
Tul'pe I.A. Iskusstvo v kontekste religiovedeniya // Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A.S. Pushkina. Ц 2012. Ц T. 2 . Ц є 3. Ц S. 192 Ц 199.
12.
Tul'pe I.A. Mifologiya. Iskusstvo. Religiya. Ц SPb.: Nauka, 2012. Ц 320 s.
13.
Ugrinovich D. M. Iskusstvo i religiya. Ц M.: Politizdat, 1982. Ц 287 s.
14.
Uspenskii L.A. Bogoslovie ikony pravoslavnoi tserkvi. Ц M.: Moskovskii patriarkhat, 1989. Ц 474 s.
15.
Filosofiya russkogo religioznogo iskusstva XVI Ц XX vv.: Antologiya / Sost., obshch. red. i predisl. N.K. Gavryushina. Ц M.: Progress, 1993. Ц 400 s.
16.
Florkovskaya A. Religioznaya tema i poiski sovremennogo iskusstva // Iskusstvovedenie. Ц 2015. Ц є 3 Ц 4. Ц S. 428 Ц 451.
17.
Shaman'kova A.I. Religioznaya tema v otechestvennoi zhivopisi vtoroi poloviny XX Ц nachala XXI vv.: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. iskusstvovedeniya. Ц SPb., 2013. Ц 25 s.
18.
Apostolos-Cappadona Diane. Art and religion // Encyclopedia of religion / Lindsay Jones, ed. in chief. Ц 2d ed. Ц Detroit: Macmillan Ref. USA: Thomson Gale, cop., 2005. Ц Vol. 1: Aaron-Attention. Ц P. 493 Ц 506.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website