|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Man and Culture
Reference:
Golovushkin D.A., Gumarova I.R. —
Expanding or limiting the boundaries of the “allowable”: to the problem of outlining the concept of “religious art”
// Man and Culture.
– 2020. – № 5.
– P. 76 - 88.
DOI: 10.25136/2409-8744.2020.5.31638 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=31638
Expanding or limiting the boundaries of the “allowable”: to the problem of outlining the concept of “religious art”
Golovushkin Dmitrii Aleksandrovich
PhD in History
Docent, the department of History of Religion and Theology, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
191186, Russia, Sankt-Peterburg, g. Saint Petersburg, Naberezhnaya reki Moiki, 48, korpus 20 (Fakul'tet sotsial'nykh nauk), kab. 214
|
golovushkinda@mail.ru
|
|
 |
Другие публикации этого автора |
|
Gumarova Irina Ravkatovna
Artist, Curator of Educational Project "Art is Here"
191024, Russia, g. Saint Petersburg, ul. Degtyarnaya, 5-7, of. -
|
iris-ruthenica@yandex.ru
|
|
 |
DOI: 10.25136/2409-8744.2020.5.31638
Review date:
07-12-2019
Publish date:
26-10-2020
Abstract. Religious art is one of the most complex and controversial phenomena in the history of art. The attempts to conceptualize this phenomenon are relatively recent, and are carried out mostly in the context of the existence of confessional, ecclesiastical/nonecclesiastical, cult/atheistic art. Therefore, religious art within the Russian humanities traditionally receives ambivalent interpretation. In a narrow sense, religious art implies a combination of artworks with dogmatic, doctrinal, and liturgical meaning. In a broad sense, religious art represents a set artworks that reveal religious themes from ideological and figurative perspectives, reflect religious worldview, faith and experience, but do not carry sacred statues, nor intended for reverence, worship, liturgical practices. The author concludes that neither definition describes the distinctness and novelty of the religious art. The appropriate interpretation describes religious art as d both, ecclesiastical/non-ecclesiastical and cult / atheistic art. This leads to a terminological confusion, and doubts the need for introducing the concept of “religious art” and the phenomenon itself. The key towards understanding this phenomenon and a new definition of the concept of “religious art” can be their context – the European and Russian secularization. It is not coincidental that the first was addressed, and the second was deliberately formulated at the turn of the XIX – XX centuries. Religious art mainstreams during the historical periods when the boundaries of secularization/religion become flexible, initiating struggle for them.
Keywords:
desecularization, secularization, non-cult art, cult art, out-of-church art, church art, confessional art, Religious art, evolution of religion, contextual analysis
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian
here
.
References
1.
|
Bychkov V.V. Russkaya teurgicheskaya estetika. – M.: Ladomir, 2007. –743 s.
|
2.
|
Glagolev V.S. Khristianskoe iskusstvo // Religiovedenie. Entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. – M.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2006. – S. 1158 – 1159.
|
3.
|
Davydov I.P. Religioznoe iskusstvo // Religiovedenie. Entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. – M.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2006. – S. 867 – 868.
|
4.
|
Istoriya religii: uchebnik dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata / V.Yu. Lebedev, A.M. Prilutskii, A.Yu. Grigorenko; pod red. V.Yu. Lebedeva, A.M. Prilutskogo. – M.: Izdatel'stvo Yurait, 2017. – 456 s.
|
5.
|
Novikova M.M. Problema teurgicheskogo tvorchestva v kontseptsiyakh kul'tury myslitelei serebryanogo veka: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. kul'turologicheskikh nauk. – Nizhnevartovsk, 1998. – 23 s.
|
6.
|
Osnovy religiovedeniya Ucheb. / Yu.F. Borunkov, I.N. Yablokov, K.I. Nikonov i dr.; Pod red. I.N. Yablokova. – M.: Vyssh. shk., 2001. – 480 s.
|
7.
|
Osnovy sotsial'noi kontseptsii Russkoi pravoslavnoi tserkvi // Azbuka very. Pravoslavnaya biblioteka [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/dokumenty/osnovy-sotsialnoj-kontseptsii-russkoj-pravoslavnoj-tserkvi/ (Data obrashcheniya: 22.11.2019).
|
8.
|
Raevskaya N.Yu. Svyashchennye izobrazheniya i izobrazheniya svyashchennogo v khristianskoi traditsii. – SPb.: SATIS'''', 2011. – 270 s.
|
9.
|
Religiovedenie: Uchebnoe posobie i Uchebnyi slovar'-minimum po religiovedeniyu / I.N. Yablokov. – M.: Gardariki, 2000. – 536 s.
|
10.
|
Tillikh P. Izbrannoe: Teologiya kul'tury. Per. s angl. – M.: Yurist, 1995. – 479 s.
|
11.
|
Tul'pe I.A. Iskusstvo v kontekste religiovedeniya // Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A.S. Pushkina. – 2012. – T. 2 . – № 3. – S. 192 – 199.
|
12.
|
Tul'pe I.A. Mifologiya. Iskusstvo. Religiya. – SPb.: Nauka, 2012. – 320 s.
|
13.
|
Ugrinovich D. M. Iskusstvo i religiya. – M.: Politizdat, 1982. – 287 s.
|
14.
|
Uspenskii L.A. Bogoslovie ikony pravoslavnoi tserkvi. – M.: Moskovskii patriarkhat, 1989. – 474 s.
|
15.
|
Filosofiya russkogo religioznogo iskusstva XVI – XX vv.: Antologiya / Sost., obshch. red. i predisl. N.K. Gavryushina. – M.: Progress, 1993. – 400 s.
|
16.
|
Florkovskaya A. Religioznaya tema i poiski sovremennogo iskusstva // Iskusstvovedenie. – 2015. – № 3 – 4. – S. 428 – 451.
|
17.
|
Shaman'kova A.I. Religioznaya tema v otechestvennoi zhivopisi vtoroi poloviny XX – nachala XXI vv.: Avtoref. dis. ... kand. iskusstvovedeniya. – SPb., 2013. – 25 s.
|
18.
|
Apostolos-Cappadona Diane. Art and religion // Encyclopedia of religion / Lindsay Jones, ed. in chief. – 2d ed. – Detroit: Macmillan Ref. USA: Thomson Gale, cop., 2005. – Vol. 1: Aaron-Attention. – P. 493 – 506.
|
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|