' ' - ' ' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Man and Culture
Reference:

Concept of montage within the system of artistic culture

Denisova Zarina Mukhriddinovna

PhD in Art History

Deputy Director, Yekaterinburg Children School of Art No. 2

620137, Russia, Sverdlovskaya oblast', g. Ekaterinburg, ul. Sadovaya, 18

zmdenisova.@mail.ru

 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8744.2018.6.28119

Review date:

24-11-2018


Publish date:

06-12-2018


Abstract: The subject of this research is the determination of the degree of scientific exploration of the concept of “montage” within the system of artistic culture, consideration of the processes of its establishment and subsequent transformation. The object of this research is the analysis of fundamental works comprise the basis of the montage theory in the system of artistic culture and fully reveal the figural-dramaturgical and compositional-structural peculiarities of this phenomenon (works of S. Eisenstein, L. Kuleshov, V. Pudovkin, Y. Tynyanov, Y. Lotman. V. Ivanov, T. Efremova, R. Salganik, N. Volkov and others). For achieving the set foal, the author selected the methodology of exploration of the term “montage” in various fields: literary studies, book publishing, culturology, aesthetics, and cinematography. A conclusion is made that the concept of “montage” was viewed by the scholars from various perspectives: as the means for expressing authorial positions; realization of figurative theme; composition of artwork; one of the types of artistic thinking that becomes common for the national art of the late XX century. This article is first to consider the concept of “montage” in the context of various humanitarian spheres. The scientific novelty lies in determination of the relevance of montage principles outside cinematography, despite the origin of the montage theory in the area of cinematic art. Modern artists of different types and genres continue to widely interpret the capabilities of montage in their works.


Keywords: concept, author's position, space, meaning, text, montage, work, art culture, structural capabilities of installation, space-time
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Azizov 3. Otvet obshchestvu potrebleniya: montazh kak iskusstvo [Tekst] / Z. Azizov //Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal. 2010. 3/4 (79/80). s. 31 33.
2.
Balash B. Vidimyi chelovek. Ocherki dramaturgii fil'ma. [Tekst] / B. Balash M.: Vserossiiskii Proletkul't, 1925. 88s.
3.
Bobrinskaya E. Kollazh v KhKh veke [Tekst] / E. Bobrinskaya // Kollazh v Rossii. KhKh vek SPb.: PalaceEditions, 2005. 391 s./S. 7 13.
4.
Berkov P. Montazh [Tekst] / Berkov P.// Literaturnaya entsiklopediya / gl. red. A. Lunacharskii: v 11 t. M.: OGIZ RSFSR, Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1934. T. 7. S. 447.
5.
Bychkov V. Estetika: Uchebnik [Tekst] / Bychkov V. M.: Gardariki, 2004. 556 s.
6.
Vaisfel'd I. Kompozitsiya v kinoiskusstve [Tekst] / I. Vaisfel'd M.: Vssoyuznyi gosudarstvennyi ordena Trudovogo Krasnogo Znameni Institut kinematografii,1974.
7.
Vaisfel'd I. Formirovanie sovetskoi teorii kino [Tekst] / I. Vaisfel'd, G. Maslovskii // Istoriya sovetskogo iskusstvovedeniya i esteticheskoi mysli 30-kh godov. M.: 1977. S. 250-317.
8.
Volkov N. Kompozitsiya v zhivopisi [Tekst] /N. Volkov M.: Iskusstvo, 1997. 263 s.
9.
Grygar M. Znakotvorchestvo: Semiotika russkogo avangarda [Tekst] / M. Grygar, per. M. Shereshevskoi, E. Chebuchevoi, G. Virinoi SPb.: Akademicheskii proekt, Izdatel'stvo DNK, 2007. 519 s.
10.
Efremova T. Sovremennyi tolkovyi slovar' russkogo yazyka: v 3 t. [Tekst] / T. Efremova M.: ACT, 2006. T. 2. 168 s.
11.
Ivanov V. Montazh kak printsip postroeniya v kul'ture pervoi poloviny XX v. [Tekst] / V. Ivanov // Montazh. Literatura, Iskusstvo, Teatr, Kino. M.: Nauka, 1988. S. 119149.
12.
Kamenskii A. Vertikal'nyi montazh [Tekst] / A. Kamenskii M.: Iskusstvo, 1980, 1.
13.
Kondrat'ev E. Khudozhestvennaya detal' i tseloe: strukturnye i istoricheskie variatsii [Tekst] / E. Kondrat'ev M.: Indrik, 2010. 320 s.
14.
Kler R. Razmyshleniya o kinoiskusstve. Zametki k istorii kinoiskusstva s 1920 po 1950 gg. [Tekst] / R. Kler M.: Iskusstvo, 1958. 232 s.
15.
Krivtsun O. Iskusstvo Novogo vremeni. Opyt kul'turologicheskogo analiza [Tekst] / O. KrivtsunSPb: Aleteiya, 2000.
16.
Krivtsun O. Estetika [Tekst] / O. KrivtsunM.: Aspekt Press, 2000.
17.
Kuleshov L. Iskusstvo kino. (Moi opyt) [Tekst] / L.Kuleshov // Sobranie sochinenii. V 3-kh t. T.1. Teoriya. Kritika. Pedagogika. M.: Iskusstvo, 1987. S.161 225 s.
18.
Kuleshov L. Praktika kinorezhissury [Tekst] / L. Kuleshov. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1935. 280 s.
19.
Kutyrev V. Filosofskii obraz nashego vremeni (bezzhiznennye miry postchelovechestva) [Tekst] / V.Kutyrev. Smolensk: Izd-vo SGPU, 2006. 301 s.
20.
Lotman Yu. Stat'i po semiotike kul'tury i iskusstva. [Tekst] / Yu. Lotman. SPb.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2002 544 s.
21.
Mints Z.G. V smyslovom prostranstve Balaganchika [Tekst] / Z.G. Mints // Trudy po znakovym sistemam. Vyp. 19. Tartu: Tartuskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 1986. S. 210-216;
22.
Mitri Zh. Vizual'nye struktury i semiologiya fil'ma // [Tekst] Zh. Mitri. Stroenie fil'ma. M.: 1984. 279 s.
23.
Mikhailov A. O khudozhestvennoi uslovnosti [Tekst] / A. Mikhailov. M.: Mysl', 1966. 320 s.
24.
Popova T. Muzykal'nye zhanry i formy [Tekst] / T. Popova. M.: 1954. 156 s.
25.
Pudovkin V. O montazhe [Tekst] / V. Pudovkin // Stat'i o kinoiskusstve. M.: 1966. S. 1 25.
26.
Tynyanov Yu. Poetika. Istoriya literatury. Kino [Tekst] / Yu. Tynyanov. M.: Nauka, 1977. 574 s.
27.
Khan A. Realizovannoe sravnenie v poetike avangarda (na materiale poemy V. Khlebnikova Zhuravl') [Tekst] / A. Khan // RussianLiterature, Amsterdam, 1989. V.26, 1.P. 90.
28.
Felonov L. Montazh v kino [Tekst]/Bol'shaya sovetskaya entsiklopediya. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya. 1969-1978. T. 16, 1974. 651s.
29.
Felonov L. Montazh kak khudozhestvennaya forma [Tekst] / L.Felonov. M.: VGIK, 1966. 162 s.
30.
Flaker A. Sistemnost' i nesistemnost' avangarda [Tekst] / A. Flaker Zhivopisnaya literatura i literaturnaya zhivopis'. M.: Tri kvadrata, 2008. S. 63 70.
31.
Shklovskii V. Eizenshtein [Tekst] / V. Shklovskii. M.: 1973. 465 s.
32.
Eizenshtein S. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Tekst]: / S. Eizenshtein. V 6 t., T. 2. M.: 1964. 232 s.
33.
Eizenshtein S. Izbrannye proizvedeniya: v 6-ti tomakh [Tekst] / S. Eizenshtein, T.Z.M.: Iskusstvo, 1964. 672 s.
34.
Yakobson, R. Poeziya grammatiki i grammatika poezii [Tekst] / R. Yakobson // Semiotika. M.: Raduga, 1983. S. 463;
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website