по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Man and Culture
Reference:

Cultural and Worldview Grounds for the Global Network Society of the XXIst Century
Tsendrovskiy Oleg

PhD in Philosophy

senior teacher of the Department of Philosophy and Social Studies at Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University

603005, Russia, Nizhegorodskaya oblast', g. Nizhnii Novgorod, ul. Ul'yanova, 1

unbknnt@gmail.com
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

The subject of the present research is the socio-economic and, mostly, worldview prerequisites for a totally new society that was formed at the turn of the XXIst century - the society that is post-industrial in terms of its material resources and post-modernistic from the point of view of its cultural code. The author of the article examines the new civilization paradigm, compares it to the industrial and agricultural models, discovers and describes the main systems thereof (technosphere, sociosphere and infosphere) and underlying institutions and ideologemes. Special emphasis is made on studying a totally new, horizontal network social communication in the age of globalization, explosion of pop culture and convergence of mass media. The methodology and at the same time the novelty of the present researchis caused by the fact that based on the analysis of the rich scientific legacy, the author makes an attempt to provide a general picture of social processes and their genetic relation to preceding civilization models instead of just describing particular aspects and spheres of such processes. From a substantive point of view, the author bases his research on the classical division of the historical process into the three parts: premodernity - modernity - postmodernity; and agricultural - industrial - post-industrial civilizations. The main scientific contribution made by the author is the summary and analysis of the results of almost half of the century of researches on a new civilization paradigm. As a result of his research, the author concludes that the post-industrial information society is based on the pluralistic doctrine of post-modernistic philosophy in the form of a decentralized network structure. In such a structure the flow of information is not controllable by authoritative agencies because it is fed by a great number of various sources and the dominating user content can be spread through viruses. Economy, all markets and systems are welded into a universal supersystem and driven by the sum of hardly predictable actions of actors from all over the world. 

Keywords: information Society, philosophy of culture, the media, network Society, globalization, post-industrial society, postmodernity, social communication, pop culture, the Internet

DOI:

10.7256/2409-8744.2015.5.16316

Article was received:

05-09-2015


Review date:

06-09-2015


Publish date:

05-10-2015


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Khorkkhaimer M., Adorno T. Dialektika Prosveshcheniya. M., SPb: Medium, Yuventa, 1997.
2.
Khabermas Yu. Filosofskii diskurs o moderne. M.: Ves' mir, 2008.
3.
Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya: sbornik. M.: Progress, 1990.
4.
Toffler E. Tret'ya volna. M.: AST, 2010.
5.
Khaidegger M. Nitsshe. SPb.: Vladimir Dal', 2010.
6.
Il'in I.P. Postmodernizm ot istokov do kontsa stoletiya: evolyutsiya nauchnogo mifa. M.: Intrada, 1998.
7.
Il'in I.P. Poststrukturalizm. Dekonstruktivizm. Postmodernizm. M.: Intrada, 1996.
8.
Derrida Zh. O grammatologii. M.: Ad Marginem, 2000.
9.
Fuko M. Predislovie k amerikanskomu izdaniyu «Anti-Edipa» // Delez Zh., Gvattari F. Kapitalizm i shizofreniya. Anti-Edip. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya, 2008.
10.
Bauman Z. Tekuchaya sovremennost'. SPb.: Piter, 2008.
11.
Bell D. Gryadushchee postindustrial'noe obshchestvo. Opyt sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya. M.: Academia, 2004.
12.
Inozemtsev V. L. Sovremennoe postindustrial'noe obshchestvo: priroda, protivorechiya, perspektivy. M.: Logos, 2000.
13.
Kastel's M. Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika, obshchestvo i kul'tura. M.: GU VShE, 2000.
14.
Bek U. Obshchestvo riska. Na puti k drugomu modernu. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2000.
15.
Skorodumova O. B. Otechestvennye podkhody k interpretatsii informatsionnogo obshchestva: postindustrialistskaya, sinergeticheskaya i postmodernistskaya paradigmy [Elektronnyi resurs] // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie: Informatsionnyi gumanitarnyi portal. 2009. № 4. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.zpu-journal.ru/e-zpu/2009/4/Skorodumova
16.
Robertson R. Globalization. London: Sage, 1992.
17.
Zelenov L.A., Vladimirov A.A., Stepanov E.I. Sovremennaya globalizatsiya: sostoyanie i perspektivy. M.: LENAND, 2010.
18.
Shendrik A. I. Globalizatsiya v sisteme kul'turologicheskikh koordinat // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2004. № 1. c. 59-71.
19.
Fukuyama F. Konets istorii i poslednii chelovek. M.: AST, 2010.
20.
Nazarchuk A. V. Setevoe obshchestvo i ego filosofskoe osmyslenie // Voprosy filosofii. 2008. № 7. S. 61-76.
21.
Kastel's M. Stanovlenie obshchestva setevykh struktur // Novaya postindustrial'naya volna na Zapade: Antologiya / Pod red. V.L. Inozemtseva. M.: Academia, 1999.
22.
Shendrik A. I. Informatsionnoe obshchestvo i ego kul'tura: protivorechiya stanovleniya i razvitiya [Elektronnyi resurs] // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2010. № 4. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.zpu-journal.ru/e-zpu/2010/4/Shendrik
23.
Kastel's M. Galaktika Internet: Razmyshleniya ob Internete, biznese i obshchestve. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya, 2004.
24.
Podlesnaya V. G. Setevye struktury: sushchnost' i rol' v sotsial'no-ekonomicheskom razvitii obshchestva // Mekhanіzm regulyuvannya ekonomіki. 2010. № 3. S. 100-106.
25.
Maklyuen G. M. Ponimanie Media: Vneshnie rasshireniya cheloveka. M.: Kanon-press-Ts, Kuchkovo pole, 2003.
26.
Giddens E. Sotsiologiya. M.: Editorial URSS, 2005.
27.
Debor Gi. Obshchestvo spektaklya. SPb.: Opustoshitel', 2011.
28.
Bodriiyar Zh. Simvolicheskii obmen i smert'. M.: Dobrosvet, 2000.
29.
Bodriiyar Zh. Obshchestvo potrebleniya. SPb.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2006
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website