DOI: 10.25136/2409-7136.2022.5.37975

Abstract: The article aims to highlight the experience of individual foreign countries (Germany and Switzerland) in the legal regulation of such a specific institution of criminal procedure law as examination. The object of this study is criminal procedural legal relations arising during the production of a visual examination of a living person's body in order to obtain information relevant to a criminal case. The subject of the study is the norms of the criminal procedure legislation of Russia, Germany and Switzerland, regulating the grounds and procedure for the production of this investigative action, as well as the works of individual scientists devoted to the investigative action under study. The main method of cognition in the course of the study was the comparative legal method, methods of analysis, synthesis, system-structural method and modeling method were also used. The novelty of the study was that the author critically examined the norms of the criminal procedure legislation of certain foreign states from the Romano-German legal family on examination, both in comparison with each other and with a similar institution of the Russian criminal process. As a result of comparing the norms of the legislation of Germany and Switzerland, the peculiarities of the legal nature and legislative regulation of the institute of examination in these states were revealed. The result of the research was the original author's proposals and recommendations on using the experience of certain norms of foreign legislation to make appropriate changes to domestic criminal procedure legislation.

DOI: 10.25136/2409-7136.2018.5.26277

Abstract: The article is devoted to particular features of the legal regulation of implementation of measures of procedural compulsion in case of economic crimes. The object of the research is the relations arising in the process of selection and application of measures of procedural compulsion to criminal proceeding parties. The subject of the research is the combination of criminal proceeding laws that regulate the procedure for selection and application of measures of procedural compulsion in case of economic crimes, as well as legal views of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and explanation of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation for particular issues related to application of measures of procedural compulsion in case of economic crimes and scientifically grounded opinions of researchers on the matters under research. In the course of his research Shamsutdinov has used general and special research methods, in particular, dialectical method, analysis, synthesis, structured system approach, comparative law, formal law, statistical method and modelling method. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the author carries out an integral research of the entire system of measures of procedural compulsion in case of economic crimes. As a result of the research, the author defines problems resulting from implementation of measures of procedural compulsion in cases of economic crimes. The author also makes a conclusion about the need to improve the existing mechanism of the legal regulation of measures of procedural compulsion as well as suggests to complete the system of measures of procedural compulsion with new and more efficient measures of compulsion. 

DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2015.6.15323

Abstract: The article attempts to reveal the main novelties in the regulation of measures in criminal-procedural compulsion using the norms of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan (CPCRK) effective January 1, 2015 in the context of the need to study foreign experience in devising prospective vectors for improving the institution of the measures of criminal-procedural compulsion in the modern criminal procedure of the Russian Federation. Prior to January 1st of 2015, the Republic of Kazakhstan used the Criminal Procedure Code of 1997, which with the exception of a few specific norms represented the continuation of the traditions of the Soviet criminal procedure. A significant step towards reform of the institution of measures of criminal-procedural compulsion in Kazakhstan was made in 2014 due to introduction of the new Criminal Procedure Code, which borrowed from the experience of various countries, including Russia. Regulation of this institution in Kazakhstan is very detailed, but in many cases controversial. As a result of the conducted research, the author formulates positions that would allow adopting the norms of the CPCRK in Russia after being critically reworked.

DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2015.6.42764

Abstract: The article attempts to reveal the main novelties in the regulation of measures in criminal-procedural compulsion using the norms of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan (CPCRK) effective January 1, 2015 in the context of the need to study foreign experience in devising prospective vectors for improving the institution of the measures of criminal-procedural compulsion in the modern criminal procedure of the Russian Federation. Prior to January 1st of 2015, the Republic of Kazakhstan used the Criminal Procedure Code of 1997, which with the exception of a few specific norms represented the continuation of the traditions of the Soviet criminal procedure. A significant step towards reform of the institution of measures of criminal-procedural compulsion in Kazakhstan was made in 2014 due to introduction of the new Criminal Procedure Code, which borrowed from the experience of various countries, including Russia. Regulation of this institution in Kazakhstan is very detailed, but in many cases controversial. As a result of the conducted research, the author formulates positions that would allow adopting the norms of the CPCRK in Russia after being critically reworked.