DOI: 10.25136/2409-7136.2022.5.37975

Abstract: The article aims to highlight the experience of individual foreign countries (Germany and Switzerland) in the legal regulation of such a specific institution of criminal procedure law as examination. The object of this study is criminal procedural legal relations arising during the production of a visual examination of a living person's body in order to obtain information relevant to a criminal case. The subject of the study is the norms of the criminal procedure legislation of Russia, Germany and Switzerland, regulating the grounds and procedure for the production of this investigative action, as well as the works of individual scientists devoted to the investigative action under study. The main method of cognition in the course of the study was the comparative legal method, methods of analysis, synthesis, system-structural method and modeling method were also used. The novelty of the study was that the author critically examined the norms of the criminal procedure legislation of certain foreign states from the Romano-German legal family on examination, both in comparison with each other and with a similar institution of the Russian criminal process. As a result of comparing the norms of the legislation of Germany and Switzerland, the peculiarities of the legal nature and legislative regulation of the institute of examination in these states were revealed. The result of the research was the original author's proposals and recommendations on using the experience of certain norms of foreign legislation to make appropriate changes to domestic criminal procedure legislation.

DOI: 10.25136/2409-7136.2018.6.26480

Abstract: The article is devoted to particular features of the legal regulation and practical implementation of such a specific measure of criminal procedure compulsion as suspension of the highest official of a Russian Federation constituent. The object of this research is the criminal procedure relations that relate to implementation of a special measure of procedure compulsion, i.e. suspension of the highest official. The subject of the research is the criminal procedure laws that regulate the decision making process regarding suspension of the highest official of a Russian Federation constituent (head of a supreme government authority of a Russian Federation constituent), constitutional regulations that set forth the procedure of suspension of the highest authority of a Russian Federation constituent (head of a supreme government authority of a Russian Federation constituent) as a result of the loss of trust in him or her as well as individual researches on the matter. In the course of the research the author has used general and special research methods including dialectical method, analysis, synthesis, structured system approach, formal law method and modelling method. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the author analyzes a topical issue of applying suspension as a measure of compulsion in relation to the highest official of a Russian Federation constituent (head of a supreme government authority of a Russian Federation constituent). As a result of the research, the author describes certain drawbacks in the legal regulation of the aforesaid measure of criminal procedure compulsion as well as offers alternative solutions. 

DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2015.6.15323

Abstract: The article attempts to reveal the main novelties in the regulation of measures in criminal-procedural compulsion using the norms of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan (CPCRK) effective January 1, 2015 in the context of the need to study foreign experience in devising prospective vectors for improving the institution of the measures of criminal-procedural compulsion in the modern criminal procedure of the Russian Federation. Prior to January 1st of 2015, the Republic of Kazakhstan used the Criminal Procedure Code of 1997, which with the exception of a few specific norms represented the continuation of the traditions of the Soviet criminal procedure. A significant step towards reform of the institution of measures of criminal-procedural compulsion in Kazakhstan was made in 2014 due to introduction of the new Criminal Procedure Code, which borrowed from the experience of various countries, including Russia. Regulation of this institution in Kazakhstan is very detailed, but in many cases controversial. As a result of the conducted research, the author formulates positions that would allow adopting the norms of the CPCRK in Russia after being critically reworked.

DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2015.6.42764

Abstract: The article attempts to reveal the main novelties in the regulation of measures in criminal-procedural compulsion using the norms of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan (CPCRK) effective January 1, 2015 in the context of the need to study foreign experience in devising prospective vectors for improving the institution of the measures of criminal-procedural compulsion in the modern criminal procedure of the Russian Federation. Prior to January 1st of 2015, the Republic of Kazakhstan used the Criminal Procedure Code of 1997, which with the exception of a few specific norms represented the continuation of the traditions of the Soviet criminal procedure. A significant step towards reform of the institution of measures of criminal-procedural compulsion in Kazakhstan was made in 2014 due to introduction of the new Criminal Procedure Code, which borrowed from the experience of various countries, including Russia. Regulation of this institution in Kazakhstan is very detailed, but in many cases controversial. As a result of the conducted research, the author formulates positions that would allow adopting the norms of the CPCRK in Russia after being critically reworked.