Участие защитника по делам несовершеннолетних
в уголовном процессе России и Армении

Дилбандян Самвел Агванович

doi:10.7256/2454-0595.2011.6.3830


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Administrative and municipal law

Reference:

Dilbandyan S.A. // Administrative and municipal law. 2011. № 6. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0595.2011.6.3830 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=3830

Участие защитника по делам несовершеннолетних в уголовном процессе России и Армении

Dilbandyan Samvel Agvanovich

iravdilbandyan@mail.ru

Article was published in rubric "Issue of the day"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0595.2011.6.3830

Received:

18-05-2011

Published:

1-6-2011

References

1. Baranov A.M. O momente dopuskaya i obyazatel'nom uchastii zaschitnika v dosudebnom proizvodstve po UPK RF // Zakonodatel'stvo i praktika. – 2002. – № 1.

2. Gorbacheva E.V. Problemy regulirovaniya sudoproizvodstva po delam nesovershennoletnih v UPK RF. // Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii «Ugolovno-processual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii: god pravoprimeneniya i prepodavaniya». – M., 2004.

3. Kondrusov E.V. Zaschitnik. Ponyatie, ego processual'noe polozhenie, dopusk zaschitnika k uchastiyu v dele, obyazatel'noe uchastie zaschitnika // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. – 2007. – № 3.

4. Motovilovker Ya., Shirshov M. Psihicheskiy nedostatok obvinyaemogo kak uslovie obyazatel'nogo uchastiya zaschitnika v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Sovetskaya yusticiya. – 1983. – № 2.

5. Makarenko I.A. Zaschitnik kak garant soblyudeniya prav i zakonnyh interesov nesovershennoletnego obvinyaemogo // Zakon i pravo. – 2006. – № 12.

6. Mischenko E.V. K voprosu ob uchastii zaschitnika v proizvodstve po delam nesovershennoletnih // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. – 2006. – № 8.

7. Tetyuev S.V. K voprosu o zaschitnike nesovershennoletnego v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve (analiz chasti 2 stat'i 49 KPK RF) // Advokatskaya praktika. – 2007. – № 5.

8. Tetyuev S.V. Zaschitnik – obyazatel'nyy uchastnik proizvodstva po ugolovnym delam v otnoshenii nesovershennoletnih // Nauchnye trudy. Rossiyskaya akademiya yuridicheskih nauk. Vyp. 9. V 3 tomah. Tom 3. – M., 2009.

9. Podol'nyy N.A. Vsegda li v interesah doveritelya, chtoby advokat deystvoval v sootvetstvii s ego voley? // Advokatskaya praktika. – 2004. – № 3.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.

Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.

Copyright protected by law of the Russian Federation.
Any materials may be published only with link to the source.
All violations of law are punishable by law. © NB-Media.