Статья 'Актуальные проблемы административной ответственности в сфере миграционных отношений ' - журнал 'Административное и муниципальное право' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

Актуальные проблемы административной ответственности в сфере миграционных отношений

Grishkovets Aleksei Alekseevich

Doctor of Law

Professor at the Institute of State and Law of the Russial Academy of Sciences, Department of Administrative Law

119019, Russia, Moscow, ul. Znamenka, 10

grishkovecz65@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0595.2016.10.20146

Received:

18-08-2016


Published:

28-10-2016


Abstract: The article considers the issues of administrative responsibility for the violation of the rules of stay in the Russian Federation for foreign citizens. The author notes that the problem of migration is very significant in modern Russia. To ensure law and order in the sphere of migration, the measures of administrative coercion are widely used, particularly, the measures of administrative responsibility. Law enforcement practice has revealed the problem of existence of various approaches to the imposition of administrative responsibility on Russian citizens, married to foreign citizens (article 18.9 “Violation of entry regulations or rules of stay in the Russian Federation by a foreign citizen or a stateless person” of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation), and Russian citizens, married to Russian citizens (article 19.15.1.”Residence of a citizen of the Russian Federation at a place of stay or a place of residence without a registration” of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation). This difference is of a discriminatory nature; it contradicts the provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Family Code of the Russian Federation. The legislator should make efforts to eliminate this difference. The research methodology is based on the recent achievements in epistemology. The author applies general philosophical and theoretical methods (dialectics, the system method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation and modeling), traditional methods of jurisprudence (formal-logical) and the special methods of sociology (statistical methods, expert assessments, etc.). The author concludes that at present, it is necessary to improve legal and organizational grounds of realization of administrative responsibility measures in the sphere of migration. The author concludes about the necessity to improve the quality of migration policy implementation in the Russian Federation. 


Keywords:

migration, exclusion, deportation, punishment, responsibility, migration policy, problem, foreign citizen, coercion, rule

References
1. Semenova A.V. Sovremennoe sostoyanie migratsionnoi bezopasnosti v Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. 2016. № 2. S. 40.
2. Doklad upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v Rossiiskoi Federatsii za 2015 god // Rossiiskaya gazeta. 2015. 24 marta.
3. Khabrieva T.Ya. Migratsionnoe pravo Rossii: teoriya i praktika. M.: Yuridicheskaya firma «KONTRAKT». 2008. S. 180.
4. Sizov I.Yu. Problemy informatsionnogo obespecheniya deyatel'nosti organov vnutrennikh del pri protivodeistvii migratsionnoi prestupnosti // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. 2012. № 1. C. 26-30.
5. Vostroknutova O.Yu. K voprosu o sovershenstvovanii administrativno-pravovogo regulirovaniya migratsionnoi politiki Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. 2011. № 1. C. 38-41.
6. Agapov A.B. K voprosu o publichnom prinuzhdenie v rossiiskom prave // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. 2013. № 7. C. 58-87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.7.9922. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_9922.html
7. Terent'eva G.V. Novyi Global'nyi podkhod ES k migratsii i mobil'nosti (GAMM) i sotsial'nye aspekty migratsionnoi politiki Italii // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2013. № 4. C. 472-478. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.04.12.
8. Terent'eva G.V. Novyi Global'nyi podkhod ES k migratsii i mobil'nosti (GAMM) i sotsial'nye aspekty migratsionnoi politiki Italii // Trendy i upravlenie. 2013. № 3. C. 62-71. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2013.3.6592.
9. Tserunyan V.A. Protivodeistvie prestupnosti migrantov v Rossii // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'. 2016. № 1. C. 26 - 32. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2016.1.17846.
10. Ledeneva V.Yu. «Pravovye i organizatsionnye osnovy protivodeistviya nezakonnoi migratsii» // Pravo i politika. 2015. № 7. C. 945 - 953. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2015.7.10781.
11. Drugov Ya.A. Kodeks Irkutskoi oblasti ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: kak vozmozhnyi rezul'tat sistematizatsii zakonodatel'stva ob administrativnoi otvetstvennosti // Pravo i politika. 2016. № 2. C. 204 - 208. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2016.2.17951.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.