MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Administrative and municipal law
Reference:
Vinokurov A.Y.
On the issue of prosecution agencies’ participation in offences prevention in the Russian Federation
// Administrative and municipal law.
2016. ¹ 7.
P. 620-626.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0595.2016.7.19590 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=19590
Ê âîïðîñó îá ó÷àñòèè îðãàíîâ ïðîêóðàòóðû â ïðîôèëàêòèêå ïðàâîíàðóøåíèé â Ðîññèéñêîé Ôåäåðàöèè
Vinokurov Alexander Yurievich
Doctor of Law
Director of the Research and Development Centre at the Academy of the Office of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation
117463, Russia, Moscow, pr-d Karamzina, 1 -1, app. 355
|
vinalexur
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0595.2016.7.19590
Received:
28-06-2016
Published:
27-07-2016
Abstract:
Based on the analysis of the provisions of the Federal law “On the fundamentals of offences prevention system in the Russian Federation”, the author reveals the legal status of prosecution agencies in the system of offences prevention. In the author’s opinion, this statutory instrument, on the one hand, contains the provisions designed for establishing the prosecutors’ role in the preventive work; on the other hand, the related provisions can hardly be considered as concrete and correct ones, due to the referenced mechanism built in it by the legislator. The author applies the method of comparison of the provisions of the considered law with the provisions of the federal law “On the Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation”. The author concludes that, despite the existing set of provisions in the federal law “On the fundamentals of offences prevention in the Russian Federation”, devoted to prosecution agencies, their direct role is limited to the supervision over the observance of laws by the subject of preventive activities.
Keywords:
offences prevention, prevention system, subjects of preventive activities, Prosecutors office, prosecutor's supervision, legal education, types of preventive activities, prosecutor's response act, warning, preventive conversation
References
1. http://www.pravo.ru.23.06.2016.
2. Proekt Federal'nogo zakona «Ob osnovakh sistemy profilaktiki pravonarushe-nii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii» (podgotovlen MVD Rossii, redaktsiya do vneseniya v Gosu-darstvennuyu Dumu FS RF, tekst po sostoyaniyu na 14.05.2013) // SPS «Konsul'tantP-lyus».
3. Moskvin G.K. O neobkhodimosti Federal'nogo zakona «O federal'noi sisteme profilaktiki pravonarushenii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii» // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. – 2010. – ¹ 5. – S. 3–8.
4. Spasennikov B.A. K obsuzhdeniyu zakonoproekta «Ob osnovakh sistemy profilak-tiki v Rossiiskoi Federatsii» // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 2011. ¹ 11. S. 54–56.
5. Vasil'ev F.P., Dul'tsev M.V., Tarabrin S.V., Dugenets D.A. O proekte Federal'nogo zakona «Ob osnovakh gosudarstvennoi sistemy profilaktiki pravonarushenii v Rossii-skoi Federatsii» // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. – 2011. – ¹ 2. – S. 24–26.
6. Vasil'kov D.S. Zakonodatel'nye osnovy profilaktiki pravonarushenii // Zakon-nost'. – 2013. – ¹ 5. – S. 37–40.
7. Zaitsev S.P. Profilaktika prestuplenii i pravonarushenii: koordinatsiya i pro-kurorskii nadzora // Zakonnost'. – 2009. – ¹ 8. C. 45.
8. SZ RF. – 1995. – ¹ 47. – St. 4472 (s posl. izm.).
9. Vedomosti VS SSSR. – 1979. – ¹ 49. – St. 843 (s posl. izm.).
10. Shalumov M.S. Problemy funktsionirovaniya rossiiskoi prokuratury v uslovi-yakh formirovaniya demokraticheskogo pravovogo gosudarstva: diss. na soisk. uchen. step. doktora yurid. nauk (12.00.11). – Ekaterinburg, 2002. – S. 279–290.
11. Vinokurov A.Yu. Rabota prokurora po preduprezhdeniyu pravonarushenii. V kn. Prokurorskii nadzor: uchebnik dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata / pod obshch. red. O.S. Ka-pinus. 3-e izdanie. V 2-kh tomakh. – M.: Izd-vo Yurait, 2016. Tom 2. – S. 313–319.
12. http://asozd.duma.gov.ru po sostoyaniyu na 31.12.2013.
13. SZ RF. – 2002. – ¹ 1 (ch. 1). – St. 1 (s posl. izm.).
14. Vinokurov A.Yu. Administrativnoe presledovanie kak funktsiya prokuratury Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – ¹ 10. – S. 52–56.
15. SZ RF. – 2008. – ¹ 52 (ch. 1). – St. 6249 (s posl. izm.)
16. SZ RF. – 2006. – ¹ 31 (ch. 1). – St. 3448 (s posl. izm.).
17. SZ RF. – 1995. – ¹ 29. – St. 2759 (s posle. izm.).
18. Zakonnost'. – 2008. – ¹ 10 (s posl. izm.).
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
