Статья 'Развитие антимонопольного законодательства в США' - журнал 'Административное и муниципальное право' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

Развитие антимонопольного законодательства в США

Pogodina Irina Vladimirovna

PhD in Law

Head of the Department of Civil Law at Vladimir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay Stoletovs. 

600005, Russia, Vladimirskaya oblast', g. Vladimir, ul. Severnaya, 108, kv. 35

irinapogodina@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 
Markova Ekaterina Sergeevna

Student at the Department of Financial Law and Customs Activities of Vladimir State University

602102, Russia, Melenki, ul. Gertsena, 54

ekat.markova2014@yandex.ru
Averin Aleksandr Valentinovich

Doctor of Law

Professor at the Department of Financial Law and Customs Activities of Vladimir State University

600005, Russia, Vladimir, ul. Gor'kogo, 87, office YuI

gpp_vlgu@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0595.2016.9.18610

Received:

02-04-2016


Published:

29-09-2016


Abstract: The article analyzes the evolution of antitrust law of the USA. The authors consider the Sherman Act, the Clayton Act, the Robinson-Patman Act and other laws which form the basis of the modern antitrust legislation of the USA. The authors enumerate the bodies responsible for antitrust regulation. The article contains the conclusion that the successful experience of the USA in the sphere of antitrust regulation can be used in Russia, particularly, in relation to preventive measures. The authors carry out the comparative-legal study of antitrust legislation of the USA and Russia. The authors apply the historical method (to study the retrospective of antitrust legislation of the USA) and the comparative-legal analysis (when comparing American and Russian legislation). The scientific novelty of the study consists in the analysis of American experience in the sphere of antitrust regulation and the possibility to use it in Russia. The authors conclude that it would be reasonable to use American experience in the sphere of preventive institutions in Russian system of antitrust regulation, broadening of powers of antimonopoly service and globalization of antimonopoly legislation. 


Keywords:

antimonopoly law, Antitrust law, Federal Trade Commission, Antitrust division, Federal antimonopoly service, antimonopoly regulation, USA, International Competition Network, Sherman act, Clayton antitrust act

References
1. Zakon Shermana (Sherman Act). Rezhim dostupa: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/1. Data obrashcheniya: 17.02.2016.
2. Zakon Kleitona (Clayton Antitrust Act). Rezhim dostupa: http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/clayton-antitrust-act. Data obrashcheniya: 24.02.2016.
3. Ofitsial'nyi sait Federal'noi torgovoi komissii (Federal Trade Commission). Rezhim dostupa: https://www.ftc.gov/. Data obrashcheniya: 01.03.2016.
4. Ofitsial'nyi sait Antitrestovskogo otdela Ministerstva yustitsii SShA (The United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division). Rezhim dostupa: https://www.justice.gov/atr. Data obrashcheniya: 10.03.2016.
5. Bakhaeva A.V. Osobennosti vozmeshcheniya antimonopol'nykh ubytkov v SShA // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2015. № 8. S. 74.
6. Ofitsial'nyi sait Global Competition Review. Rezhim dostupa: http://globalcompetitionreview.com/. Data obrashcheniya: 13.03.2016.
7. Zakon RSFSR ot 22.03.1991 № 948-1 (red. ot 26.07.2006) «O konkurentsii i ogranichenii monopolisticheskoi deyatel'nosti na tovarnykh rynkakh» // SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
8. Ofitsial'nyi sait Federal'noi Antimonopol'noi Sluzhby Rossii. Rezhim dostupa: http://fas.gov.ru. Data obrashcheniya: 18.03.2016.
9. Borzova M., Podguzova K. Osobennosti antimonopol'nogo kontrolya v ES i SShA // SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus». 2013.
10. Bakhaeva A.V. Osobennosti vozmeshcheniya antimonopol'nykh ubytkov v SShA // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2015. № 8. S. 76.
11. Arbitrazhnyi protsessual'nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 24.07.2002 № 95-FZ (red. ot 30.12.2015) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 01.01.2016). // SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
12. Ofitsial'nyi sait Mezhdunarodnoi konkurentnoi seti. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/. Data obrashcheniya: 19.03.2016.
13. Bashlakov-Nikolaev I.V. Mery prinuzhdeniya v sfere zashchity konkurentsii // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2015. - 3. - C. 306 - 318. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2015.3.15080.
14. Bashlakov-Nikolaev I.V. Mery prinuzhdeniya v sfere zashchity konkurentsii // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2015. - 2. - C. 183 - 194. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2015.2.15741.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.