Vinokurov A.Y.
On some issues of legal regulation of public prosecutor’s office bodies of the CIS member-states in the sphere of administrative prosecution
// Administrative and municipal law.
2015. № 6.
P. 609-616.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0595.2015.6.15066 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=15066
О некоторых вопросах правового регулирования деятельности органов прокуратуры государств - участников СНГ по осуществлению административного преследования
Vinokurov Alexander Yurievich
Doctor of Law
Director of the Research and Development Centre at the Academy of the Office of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation
Abstract: The subject of the research covers the peculiarities of legal regulation of the activities of public prosecutor’s office bodies of the CIS member-states in the sphere of administrative prosecution. This paper is the first stage of a comparative-legal study and is devoted to the analysis of the provisions of status legislative acts of the countries of the post-Soviet space (except for the Baltic states), regulating the issues of organization and activity of the public prosecutor’s office bodies and the model law on the public prosecutor’s office. The author emphasizes the provisions which are similar for the public prosecutor’s offices of different countries and outlines the distinct features of a public prosecutor’s office of each country. The methodology of the research is based on the comparative-legal and partially on the historical method which allow the author to reveal the similarities and differences in realization of administrative prosecution functions by the public prosecutor’s offices of different countries of the CIS. The author carries out the comparative-legal analysis of the provisions of laws on public prosecutor’s office of the CIS countries in the area of consolidatioin of the prosecutors’ responsibilities in the sphere of administrative offences revelation. The author concludes that the prosecutors in the CIS member-states have similar and unique responsibilities in the sphere of administrative prosecution depending on a model of public prosecutor’s office development of each country.
Keywords:
function of the procecutor's office, prosecutor's status, involvement in the process, decision, administrative prosecution, administrative offence, administrative proceeding, administrative and jurisdictional process, public prosecutor's office bodies, prosecutor's responsibilities
References
1. Razorenov K.I. Funktsiya administrativnogo presledovaniya v administrativno-yurisdiktsionnom protsesse: diss. na soisk. uchen. step. kand. yurid. nauk.12.00.14. – M., 2011; Tyurina A.A. Funktsiya zashchity v administrativno-yurisdiktsionnom protsesse: diss. na soisk. uchen. step. kand. yurid. nauk.12.00.14. – M., 2007.
2. Vinokurov A.Yu. Administrativnoe presledovanie kak funktsiya prokuratury Ros-siiskoi Federatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – № 10. – S. 52-56.
3. Subanova N.V. K voprosu ob osushchestvlenii prokuraturoi funktsii administra-tivnogo presledovaniya // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. – 2015. – №
4. – S. 67-73. 4. Prokurorskii nadzor: uchebnik dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata / pod red. Yu.E. Vinokurova. – 12-e izdanie. – M.: Yurait. 2015. – S. 286-303.
5. Shcherba S.P., Reshetnikova T.A., Zaitsev O.A. Prokuratura v stranakh SNG (pravovoi status, funktsii, polnomochiya): nauchnoe i uchebnoe posobie / pod obshch. i nauch. red. S.P. Shcherby. – M.: Ekzamen, 2007; Shcherba S.P., Reshetnikova T.A., Frolova M.A. Polnomochiya organov prokuratury gosudarstva – uchastnikov SNG: monografiya / pod obshch. i nauch. red. S.P. Shcherby. – M.: Yurlitinform, 2013.
6. Kolotilo A.O. Status prokurora v proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v Rossii i Ukraine // Zakonnost'. – 2013. – № 12. Podcherknem, chto samo po sebe uchastie prokurora v rassmotrenii sudami takikh del ne yavlyaetsya chast'yu realiza-tsii funktsii administrativnogo presledovaniya, sostavlyaya soderzhanie takoi traditsion-no izvestnoi funktsii kak uchastie prokurora v rassmotrenii del sudami (sm.: Vinokurov A.Yu. Ukaz. rab. – S. 55).
7. SZ RF. – 1995. – № 47. – St. 4472 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
8. Model'nyi zakon o prokurature: prinyat postanovleniem Mezhparlamentskoi Assamblei gosudarstv – uchastnikov SNG ot 16.11.2006 № 27-6 // Informatsionnyi byul-leten'. Mezhparlamentskaya Assambleya gosudarstv – uchastnikov Sodruzhestva Nezavisi-mykh Gosudarstv. – 2007. – № 39 (ch. 1). – S. 317-362.
9. Stat'i 1, 22, 25 i 26 Zakona o prokurature.
10. Golos Ukrainy ot 25.10.2014 № 206.
11. Bidomosti Verkhovnoi Radi. – 1991. – № 53. – St. 793 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
12. Akhbori Madzhlisi Oli Respubliki Tadzhikistan. – 2005. – № 7. – St. 398 (s po-sled. izmeneniyami).
13. Online.zakon.kz. Data obrashcheniya – 20.04.2015.
14. Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta Respubliki Uzbekistan. – 1993. – № 1. – St. 29 (s posled. izmeneniyami). Utverzhden v novoi redaktsii Zakonom Respubliki Uzbekistan ot 29.08.2001 № 257-II «O vnesenii izmenenii i dopolnenii v Zakon Respubliki Uzbeki-stan ″O prokurature″» // lex.uz. Data obrashcheniya – 20.04.2015.
15. Base.spinform.ru. Zakonodatel'stvo stran SNG. Data obrashcheniya – 20.04.2015.
16. www.pravo.by. Natsional'nyi internet-portal Respubliki Belarus'. Data obra-shcheniya – 20.04.2015.
17. www.prokuror.kg. Ofitsial'nyi sait General'noi prokuratury Kyrgyzskoi Res-publiki. Data obrashcheniya – 20.04.2015.
18. Base.spinform.ru. Zakonodatel'stvo stran SNG. Data obrashcheniya – 20.04.2015.
19. Law.vl.ru. Data obrashcheniya – 20.04.2015.
20. Eto sozvuchno podkhodu, ranee imevshemu zakreplenie v st. 230 «Prokurorskii nadzor za ispolneniem zakonov pri proizvodstve po delam ob administrativnykh pravo-narusheniyakh» KoAP RSFSR. A v deistvuyushchei st. 25.1 KoAP RF takie polnomochiya kha-rakterizuyut prokurora kak uchastnika proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pra-vonarusheniyakh.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
