Состояние правового регулирования административного судопроизводства: пути решения.

Приженникова Алёна Николаевна

doi:10.7256/2306-9945.2013.5.8739


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice

Reference:

Prizhennikova A.N. — Current situation in the legal regulation of administrative judicial procedure: possible solutions. // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2013. – № 5. – P. 70 - 85. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2013.5.8739 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=8739

Current situation in the legal regulation of administrative judicial procedure: possible solutions.

Prizhennikova Alena Nikolaevna

PhD in Law

Associate Professor of the Department of Civil and Arbitration Process of the Financial University under the auspices of the Government of the Russian Federation

Russia, 109456, Moskva, 4 Veshnyakovskii pr-d, d.1.

alenaprizhen@mail.ru

Другие публикации этого автора

DOI:

10.7256/2306-9945.2013.5.8739

Review date:

Publish date:

1-5-2013

Abstract.

Topicality of the issue is due to the current reform of the judiciary in Russia, which is aimed at the formation of independent and fair judiciary. The judicial legal reform facilitates the further advancement of the normative legal basis, and the legislative basis is constantly being amended. The number of claims of natural persons and legal entities in courts becomes greater, and there is a practical discussion of the possibility to divide the judicial system according to the spheres of their competence. Currently within the framework of judicial reform the Draft Federal Law N. 246960 6 "The Administrative Judicial Procedural Code of the Russian Federation" was moved to the State Duma of the Russian Federation on March 28, 2013. It is aimed at the legal regulation of administrative judicial procedure in courts of general jurisdiction, while not encompassing the entire range of administrative judicial procedures, since the proceedings on the administrative offences cases is outside its scope. That is why, there are contradictions, and they shall not be abolished with adoption of the Code. The situation appears again, when the administrative judicial procedure shall be regulated by three Codes, which does not promote unified and efficient administrative justice.
Keywords: judical reform, judicial power, administrative legal relations, public proceedings, administrative case, administrative dispute, administrative justice, adminstrative judicial procedure, administrative procedures, economic dispute
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Absalyamov A.V. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty sootvetstviya pravovykh institutov administrativnogo i arbitrazhnogo protsessov // Rossiiskii ezhegodnik predprinimatel'skogo (kommercheskogo) prava.-2008.-№ 2 / Pod red. V.F. Popondopulo. SPb., 2009.
2.	Gonzus I.P. Problemy primeneniya novogo APK RF i KoAP RF // Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess.-2003.-№ 7.-S. 2 – 5.
3.	Gros' L.A. KoAP RF: Ignorirovanie norm grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo prava // Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess.-2002.-№ 12.-S. 14-17.
4.	Morozova N.A. Sootnoshenie norm KoAP RF i APK RF, reguliruyushchikh proizvodstvo po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Arbitrazhnaya praktika.-2003.-№ 3.-S. 33.
5.	Partsii Ya.E. Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo v arbitrazhnykh sudakh po novomu APK RF // Grazhdanin i pravo.-2003.-№ 1.-S. 5.
6.	Popova Yu.A. Protsessual'naya forma razresheniya sporov, voznikayushchikh iz publichnykh i administrativnykh pravootnoshenii // Rossiiskii sud'ya.-2011.-№ 4 // SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
7.	Popondopulo V.F. Sistema tret'ei vlasti: ot gorizontal'noi organizatsii k vertikal'noi // Zakon.-2004.-№ 10.-S. 115.
8.	Radchenko V. Administrativnye sudy prizvany zashchitit' cheloveka ot proizvola nedobrosovestnykh chinovnikov // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya.-2004.-№ 3.-S. 2-45.
9.	Tsygankova V. Novye kodeksy-edinstvo protsessa? // EZh-Yurist.-2003.-№ 14.
10.	Shelyutto M.L. Obzor VI Ezhegodnykh nauchnykh chtenii, posvyashchennykh pamyati professora S.N. Bratusya // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava.-2012.-№ 1 // SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
11.	Vasil'eva E.S., Nekhaichik V.K. Kontseptsiya administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva v mekhanizme administrativno-pravovogo vozdeistviya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 10. - C. 38 - 43.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.