Изменения в системе управления развитием космического сектора США: результаты тематического исследования (case study)

Яник Андрей Александрович

doi:10.7256/2306-9945.2019.2.29344


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice

Reference:

Yanik A.A. — Changes in the System of Managing the Development of the USA's Space Sector: the Case Study Results // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. – 2019. – № 2. – P. 5 - 21. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2019.2.29344 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=29344

Changes in the System of Managing the Development of the USA's Space Sector: the Case Study Results

Yanik Andrey Aleksandrovich

PhD in Technical Science

Leading Scientific Associate, Institute for Demographic Research of the Federal Research Sociological Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences

119333, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Fotievoi, 6, korp.1, of. 1

cpi_2002_1@yahoo.co.uk

Другие публикации этого автора

DOI:

10.7256/2306-9945.2019.2.29344

Review date:

21-03-2019

Publish date:

28-03-2019

Abstract.

The object of the research is the system of state management of developing the space sector in the USA. The subject of the case study is the changes that have been happening in the system of management of American space development under the conditions of instability, uncertainty, complexity and contradictions of the modern world. The author of the article focuses on such phenomena as the growth of interest towards the evaluation of societal effects of space projects and programs, improvement of the mechanism that records numerous interfaces of stakeholders, transformation of the role of different elements in the system of state management of space development in order to preserve the leading position of the USA disregarding the external conditions. To achieve the aforesaid research objectives, the author has used general research methods (generalisation, analysis and synthesis), empirical and comparative (comparative history, comparative law) research methods. The author demonstrates that analysis of mechanisms that allow national management systems to make efficient changes and successfully perform their tasks (including space development) is an important area for further research. The author notes that excessive regulation of executive authorities' activity reduces their adaptability. Based on the analysis of the USA, the author demonstrates that under current conditions the role of auditing chambers is growing because this is the institution that offers a unique 'feedback' mechanism and may act not only legally and legitimately but also fast and efficiently.
Keywords: Performance Audit, Government Accountability Office, NASA, USA, Russia, Space Activity, Space Economy, Space Policy, Project Assessment, Project Management
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 7 maya 2018 g. № 204 (red. ot 19.07.2018) «O natsional'nykh tselyakh i strategicheskikh zadachakh razvitiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii na period do 2024 goda» // SZ RF.-2018.-№ 20.-St. 2817.
2.	Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 1 dekabrya 2016 g. № 642 «O Strategii nauchno-tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii» // SZ RF.-2016.-№ 49.-St. 6887.
3.	Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 24 iyulya 2017 g. № 1325-r (red. ot 26.09.2017) (vmeste s «Planom meropriyatii po realizatsii Strategii nauchno-tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii na 2017-2019 gody (pervyi etap)») // SZ RF.-2017.-№ 28.-St. 4174.
4.	Pasport natsional'nogo proekta «Nauka» (utv. prezidiumom Soveta pri Prezidente Rossiiskoi Federatsii po strategicheskomu razvitiyu i natsional'nym proektam, protokol ot 3 sentyabrya 2018 g. № 10).
5.	«Dogma, chudesa i tainstva»: Rogozin nazval kosmos rossiiskoi religiei // RIA Novosti.-2018. 28 iyunya.
6.	Space2030: Space as a Driver for Peace-World Leaders Proclaim Innovative Space Diplomacy as the New Frontier for Peace on Earth // Space.com.-2018.-September 26.
7.	Harwood W. Pence rallies Johnson Space Center workers with promise of moon missions // Spaceflight Now.-2018.-August 23.
8.	Tronin V.G., Yukhno I.V. Analiz kachestva upravleniya kosmicheskimi proektami // Vestnik UlGTU.-2017.-№ 2 (78).-S. 71-77.
9.	Makarova D.Yu. Podderzhanie konkurentosposobnosti raketno-kosmicheskoi otrasli v sovremennykh usloviyakh usilivayushcheisya globalizatsii i poyavleniya novykh biznes-modelei na mirovom kosmicheskom rynke // Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost'.-2016.-№ 11 (344).-S. 39-49.
10.	Makarova D.Yu. Razvitie chastnogo biznesa v raketno-kosmicheskoi otrasli: tendentsii i perspektivy // Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika.-2015.-№ 25 (424).-S. 57-71.
11.	Karpova K. V. Sistemy upravleniya raketno-kosmicheskoi promyshlennost'yu v zarubezhnykh stranakh // Transportnoe delo Rossii.-2013.-№ 5.-S. 249-253.
12.	Paison D.B. Konkurentsiya v raketno-kosmicheskoi promyshlennosti: vremya strategicheskikh reshenii // Vestnik GLONASS.-2013.-№ 4.-S. 13.-19.
13.	Paison D.B. Kosmicheskaya deyatel'nost': Evolyutsiya, organizatsiya, instituty.-M.: Librokom, 2010.-312 s.
14.	Afonasova M.A., Arkhipova T.V. Innovatsionnaya sostavlyayushchaya ekonomicheskoi ustoichivosti goskorporatsii «Roskosmos» // Reshetnevskie chteniya.-2017.-№ 21.-S. 459-461.
15.	Slavyanov A.S., Khrustalev E.Yu., Khrustalev O.E. Riskovye situatsii pri formirovanii i realizatsii innovatsionnykh proektov sozdaniya naukoemkoi raketno-kosmicheskoi tekhniki // Audit i finansovyi analiz.-2016.-№ 2.-S. 367-373.
16.	Fal'ko S.G., Tsisarskii A.D., Baev G.O. Upravlenie sebestoimost'yu i prognozirovanie tsen po etapam zhiznennogo tsikla sozdaniya raketno-kosmicheskoi tekhniki (RKT) // Kontrolling.-2013.-№ 1.-S. 70-74.
17.	Khrustalev E.Yu., Slavyanov A.S., Sakharov I.E. Metody i instrumentarii vybora mekhanizmov ekonomicheskoi zashchity naukoemkikh proizvodstv na primere raketno-kosmicheskoi promyshlennosti // Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika.-2013.-№ 30.-S. 2-11.
18.	Shvab K., Devis N. Tekhnologii Chetvertoi promyshlennoi revolyutsii.-M.: Eksmo. 2018. – 320 s.
19.	Yanik A.A. Kosmicheskie programmy i problemy otsenki sotsietal'nogo vozdeistviya proektov Big Science // Issledovaniya kosmosa.-2017.-№ 3.-S. 216-227.
20.	World Value Survey. URL: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2018).
21.	OECD Better Life Index. URL: http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/ (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2018); The Social Progress Imperative: Social Progress Index. URL: http://www.socialprogressimperative.org/ (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2018).
22.	Rafols I. There’s no silver bullet for measuring societal impact // Research Europe.-2017.-12 October.
23.	Hertzfeld H.R. Measuring the economic returns from successful NASA life sciences technology transfers // The Journal of Technology Transfer.-2002.-Vol. 27.-№ 4.-P. 311-320.
24.	Big Science and Innovation / P. Simmonds, E. Kraemer-Mbula, A. Horvath, J. Stroyan, F. Zuijdam.-Brighton: Technopolis group, 2013. – 141 p.
25.	NASA Spinoff: NASA Technology Transfer Program. URL: https://spinoff.nasa.gov (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2018).
26.	NASA Spinoff 2012. URL: https://spinoff.nasa.gov/Spinoff2012/toc_2012.html (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2018).
27.	Popova S.M. Zakon SShA o kommercheskom kosmose 2015 g. i voprosy modernizatsii mezhdunarodnogo kosmicheskogo prava // Issledovaniya kosmosa. – 2016.-№ 1.-S. 51-65.
28.	Popova S.M. Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya mezhdunarodnogo kosmicheskogo prava // Pravo i gosudarstvo.-2016.-№ 4 (73).-S. 66-71.
29.	Popova S.M. Novyi trend kosmicheskogo prava: sozdanie «blagopriyatnykh yurisdiktsii» dlya kosmicheskoi deyatel'nosti// Issledovaniya kosmosa . – 2017. – № 1. – S. 46 – 57.
30.	Popova S.M. Initsiativa Lyuksemburga SpaceResources.lu i vozmozhnye posledstviya dlya regulirovaniya mirovogo rynka kosmicheskoi deyatel'nosti // Issledovaniya kosmosa.-2017.-№ 4.-S.273-285.
31.	Communications Satellite Act of 1962 (Pub. L. 87-624). URL: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-76/pdf/STATUTE-76-Pg419.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2018).
32.	Socol S.K. Comsat’s first decade: difficulties in interpreting the Communications Satellite Act of 1962.-Repository School of Law University of Georgia, 1977. URL: https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=2324&context=gjicl (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2018).
33.	Comsat Corporation History. URL: http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/comsat-corporation-history/ (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2018).
34.	The U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act of 2015. Public Law 114-90. Nov. 25, 2015. URL: https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/2262/text (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2018).
35.	Loi du 20 Juillet 2017 sur l’exploration et l’utilisation des ressources de l’espace // Journal officiel du Grand Duché de Luxembourg. 28.07.2017. URL: http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2017/07/20/a674/jo (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2018)
36.	The space industry is now 2% of Luxembourg’s GDP, deputy prime minister Etienne Schneider says // CNBS. – 2017.-11 Nov.. URL: https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/11/etienne-schneider-the-space-industry-is-now-2-percent-of-luxembourgs-gdp.html (data obrashcheniya: 01.11.2018).
37.	Dutov A.V., Polovinkin V.N. Mirovoi opyt upravleniya nauchno-tekhnicheskim progressom v aviastroenii. Opyt NASA, ACARE (DLR, ONERA, NLR). Strategii nauchno-tekhnicheskogo razvitiya i poryadok vypolneniya NIOKR.-Tsentr komp'yuternogo inzhiniringa SPbPU.-2013.-20 fevralya. URL: http://fea.ru/news/5427 (data obrashcheniya: 13.11.2018).
38.	National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (Pub. L. 85-568). URL: https://history.nasa.gov/spaceact.html (data obrashcheniya: 13.11.2018).
39.	Dreier C. NASA's 2019 Budget Takes Shape // Planetary Society.-2018.-June 15.
40.	Foust J. NASA receives $20.7 billion in omnibus appropriations bill // StaceNews.-2018.-March 22. URL: https://spacenews.com/nasa-receives-20-7-billion-in-omnibus-appropriations-bill/ (data obrashcheniya: 13.11.2018).
41.	Budget and Accounting Act, 1921 (Pub. L. 67-13); GAO Human Capital Reform Act of 2004, (Pub. L. 108-271).
42.	Jordana J., Levi-Faur D., Fernandez i Marin X. The global diffusion of regulatory agencies: institutional emulation and the restructuring of modern bureaucracy. 2009. URL: http://xavier-fim.net/doc/xfim_jj_dlf-global_diffusion_regulatory_agencies-cps-2011.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 11.11.2018).
43.	Braithwaite J. Regulatory Capitalism: How it Works, Ideas for Making it Work Better.-Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2008. – 260 p.
44.	Minogue M., Cariño L. Regulatory Governance in Developing Countries.-Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2008. – 252 p.
45.	Levi-Faur D. The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism // Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.-2005.-Vol. 598.-P. 12-32.
46.	Minogue M. Governance-Based Analysis of Regulation // Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics.-2002.-Vol. 73.-P. 649-666.
47.	Clyde Wayne Crews «Nobody Knows How Many Federal Agencies Exist» // Competitive Enterprise Institute.-August 26, 2015. URL: https://cei.org/blog/nobody-knows-how-many-federal-agencies-exist (data obrashcheniya: 11.11.2018).
48.	Golodnikova A.E., Efremov A.A., Sobol' D. V., Tsygankov D. B., Shklyaruk M. S. Regulyatornaya politika v Rossii: Osnovnye tendentsii i arkhitektura budushchego / pod red.: Komina M.O.-M.: Tsentr strategicheskikh razrabotok, 2018. – 192 s.
49.	Vogel S. K. Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries.-Cornell University Press, 1996.
50.	Alekseev A.S. Proiskhozhdenie chrezvychaino ukaznogo prava i ego politicheskoe znachenie. — M.: tip. G. Lissnera i D. Sobko, 1913.
51.	Luchin V.O. Ukaznoe pravo v Rossii. – M.: KhGTs Veles, 1996. – 52 s.
52.	Okun'kov L.A. Ukazy Prezidenta RF i problemy ikh sovershenstvovaniya // Zakonodatel'stvo.-2000.-№ 12. – S. 59-67.
53.	Corn G.S. Legitimacy and the Rule of Law Under Donald Trump // Lawfare. – 2016, 14 November. URL: https://www.lawfareblog.com/legitimacy-and-rule-law-under-donald-trump (data obrashcheniya: 11.11.2018).
54.	Mellman M. Trump’s crisis of legitimacy // The Hill. – 2017, 23 May.-URL: https://thehill.com/opinion/mark-mellman/334856-trumps-crisis-of-legitimacy (data obrashcheniya: 11.11.2018)/
55.	Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 (Pub. L. 110–161). URL: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-110publ161/pdf/PLAW-110publ161.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 13.11.2018).
56.	The Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 (Pub. L. 111–8). URL: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ8/content-detail.html (data obrashcheniya: 13.11.2018).
57.	Explanatory Statement, 155 Cong. Rec. H1653, 1824-25 (daily ed., Feb. 23, 2009), on H.R. 1105. URL: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/CREC-2009-10-28/CREC-2009-10-28-pt1-PgS10852 (data obrashcheniya: 13.11.2018).
58.	Peters B.G., Erkkilä T., von Maravić P. Public Administration. Research Strategies, Concepts, and Methods.-Routledge, 2015.-204 p.
59.	Johnson G. Research Methods foe Public Administrators 3rd edition.-Routledge, 2014. – 350 p.
60.	NASA Space Flight Program and Project Management Handbook. NASA/SP-2014-3705.-Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Headquarters. Office of the Chief Engineer, 2014. – 562 p.
61.	Progress on Many High-Risk Areas, While Substantial Efforts Needed on Others. High-Risk Series GAO-17-317.-Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office, 2017. – 676 p.
62.	Determining Performance and Accountability Challenges and High Risks. GAO-01-159SP.-Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office, 2000. – 15 p.
63.	NASA Assessments of Major Projects. GAO-18-280SP.-Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office, 2018. – 118 p.
64.	HIGH-RISK SERIES: Substantial Efforts Needed to Achieve Greater Progress on High-Risk Areas. Report to Congressional Committees. GAO-19-157SP, March 2019. – US Government Accountability Office, 2019.-286 p.
65.	NASA: Assessments of Major Projects, GAO-16-309SP.-Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office, 2016. – 90 p.
66.	NASA Commercial Crew Program: Continued Delays Pose Risks for Uninterrupted Access to the International Space Station. GAO-18-317T.-Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office, 2018. – 19 p.
67.	NASA Commercial Crew Program: Schedule Pressure Increases as Contractors Delay Key Events. GAO-17-137.-Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office, 2017. – 32 p.
68.	Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle: Action Needed to Improve Visibility into Cost, Schedule, and Capacity to Resolve Technical Challenges GAO-16-620.-Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office, 2016. – 51 p.
69.	James Webb Space Telescope: Integration and Test Challenges Have Delayed Launch and Threated to Push Costs Over Cap. GAO-18-273.-Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office, 2018. – 26 p.
70.	Space Policy Directive-2, Streamlining Regulations on Commercial Use of Space. 2018. May 24. URL: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/space-policy-directive-2-streamlining-regulations-commercial-use-space/ (data obrashcheniya: 13.11.2018).
71.	Opinion: Commercial crew – It was never about saving money // SpaceFight Insider.-2016.-November 1.
72.	NASA Commercial Crew Program Plan Needed to Ensure Uninterrupted Access to the International Space Station. GAO-18-476.-Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office, 2018. – 42 p.
73.	Houser K. NASA Certifies SpaceX’s Falcon 9 to Launch Its Top Missions // Futurism.com.-2018.-9 November. URL: https://futurism.com/falcon-9-spacex-nasa-category-3?fbclid=IwAR0f1UGiFBPtd1rbvIUuSKrMhWU6AaXc5l5_kFs5nBAMxaOJ9Aw0BXZm2Ys (data obrashcheniya: 11.11.2018).
74.	Kokoshin A.A. O strategicheskom planirovanii v politike.-M.: KomKniga, 2007.-224 s.
75.	Mintsberg G., Al'strend B., Lempel Dzh. Shkoly strategii.-SPb: Izdatel'stvo «Piter», 2000.-336 s;.
76.	Freeman R. E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach.-Boston, MA: Pitman Publishing, 1984,-275 p.
77.	Freeman R. E. The stakeholder approach revisited // Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Unternehmensethik.-2004.-Jg. 5.-Heft 3.-P. 242-254.
78.	Federal'nyi zakon ot 5 aprelya 2013 g. № 41-FZ (red. ot 07.02.2017) «O Schetnoi palate Rossiiskoi Federatsii» // SZ RF. – 2013.-№ 14.-St. 1649.
79.	Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 31oktyabrya 2018 g. № 1288 «Ob organizatsii proektnoi deyatel'nosti v Pravitel'stve Rossiiskoi Federatsii» (vmeste s «Polozheniem ob organizatsii proektnoi deyatel'nosti v Pravitel'stve Rossiiskoi Federatsii») // SZ RF.-2018.-№ 45.-St. 6947

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.